You people follow the same pattern every time: demand evidence, and then when it's provided, either ignore it or shift the goalposts.
The Telegraph article I cited includes a clear reference to official Hamas figures. This wasn’t some obscure claim - it was a widely reported global story, covered by dozens of major outlets. You can verify it yourself with a 10-second Google search. Are you seriously suggesting that Hamas is manipulating its own casualty data to make it look like fewer women and children were killed? Can you offer a single reason as to why they would do that?
As for the UN Secretary-General’s statement on child soldiers, again: public record. The use of child fighters by Hamas and other Palestinian factions has been documented for years — by the UN, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty. It's not some fringe claim, it's standard knowledge in human rights reporting.
After days of running in circles with the same denialist tactics and bad-faith responses, I’ll make this simple:
If I take more time out of my day to dig up the original reports, primary source links, and direct quotes - not just summaries in articles - then here’s my ask in return:
You acknowledge that you were wrong to question my integrity, apologise for wasting my time, and admit two basic realities:
First, that the casualty figures clearly reflect a high proportion of fighting-age males, not primarily women and children which in turn is a pretty obvious indicator that Israel is targeting combatants.
Secondly, Zthat Hamas uses child soldiers, and any honest conversation should include a clear condemnation of that fact as well as its likely impact on the number of injured or dead children.
If you're willing to do that, fine - I’ll put in the time because educating someone on their bias snd getting to an honest picture is worth that investment.
If not, then I'm not indulging 5 seconds on you. Believe whatever you like. Uninformed rage is your perogative.