I think it is noticeable that the instinct of the IDF soldiers in this case was to set the dog on the 16 year old boy after they had him under control anyway, in other words, in a vindictive attack that was not a normal arrest.
That is why the Israeli Brigadier General said the use of the dog was an immoral act. So this was not what should constitute a routine use.
This was at an illegal settlement. Karmei Tzur settlement, not that the IDF would have recognised it as such.
Then there was the old woman dragged out of her bed an out the door of her home by an Israeli IDF dog.
There are dog houses with chained dogs set around illegal settlements to be intimidating to Palestinians.
Dogs in Israeli prisons are used to terrify and humiliate prisoners. They are held by a leash inches away from a prisoner while growling and snapping at them. Or allowed to maul them while muzzled.
Maybe someone Muslim here might be able to add what misuse of dogs on them would feel like, but I think it could be defiling and humiliating.
So I disagree that this is all normal routine dog army work even though that may have been the original intention.
And it seems possible to me that EasterIssland has a good idea of what the reality concerning dogs is turning out to be, in practice, in no few instances.