Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

IDF fixation with looting Palestinian women’s underwear

113 replies

Prrambulate · 04/03/2024 19:48

Can someone explain this disturbing phenomenon?

OP posts:
LemonyTicket · 03/04/2024 20:27

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Auvergne63 · 04/04/2024 11:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Of course we are all antisemitic and hate Israel.
How dare we to express our anger at the actions of the Israeli government /IDF, How dare international organisations/ heads of state criticise them.
How dare we express compassion/empathy towards other human beings.
How dare we back up our opinions with facts from a wide range of sources.
How dare we!

littleburn · 04/04/2024 11:51

VAWG is a common trope of conflict, most often through rape. Humiliating the other side by violating their 'property'. Parading the underwear of Palestinian Muslim women fits within that trope. As does parading the naked body of a Jewish Israeli women in the back of a truck. Not making a pro/anti anyone post here. Just pointing out the commonality of females being sexually humiliated and violated in conflict.

maudelovesharold · 04/04/2024 13:25

So, no, there is no equivalence at all! 7 October was a shock event and everyone condemned it!

Nah, it wasn't a "shock event". It was planned for years. And no, not "everyone condemned it".

It was an abominable attack on innocent civilians which was rightfully condemned by the majority of people around the world. To likewise condemn Israel’s increasingly disproportionate response in killing thousands of innocent Gazan civilians is not, btw, anti-Semitic.

One thing has consistently puzzled me, and I might as well say it here. If, as you state, the 7/10 attack wasn’t a shock and was planned for years, it’s even harder to understand how one of the best funded, most sophisticated intelligence and security systems in the world was caught so catastrophically on the back foot. Stopping incursions across the border is surely a priority? Makes as much sense to me as bombing a clearly marked convoy of food aid trucks.

ScrollingLeaves · 04/04/2024 21:48

maudelovesharold · 04/04/2024 13:25

So, no, there is no equivalence at all! 7 October was a shock event and everyone condemned it!

Nah, it wasn't a "shock event". It was planned for years. And no, not "everyone condemned it".

It was an abominable attack on innocent civilians which was rightfully condemned by the majority of people around the world. To likewise condemn Israel’s increasingly disproportionate response in killing thousands of innocent Gazan civilians is not, btw, anti-Semitic.

One thing has consistently puzzled me, and I might as well say it here. If, as you state, the 7/10 attack wasn’t a shock and was planned for years, it’s even harder to understand how one of the best funded, most sophisticated intelligence and security systems in the world was caught so catastrophically on the back foot. Stopping incursions across the border is surely a priority? Makes as much sense to me as bombing a clearly marked convoy of food aid trucks.

If, as you state, the 7/10 attack wasn’t a shock and was planned for years, it’s even harder to understand how one of the best funded, most sophisticated intelligence and security systems in the world was caught so catastrophically on the back foot. Stopping incursions across the border is surely a priority? Makes as much sense to me as bombing a clearly marked convoy of food aid trucks

It is hard to understand. The IDF didn’t need to kill 32000, they just needed not to have left 15 young female soldiers all alone guarding the border, and to have at least listened to all their warnings in the first place.

How the female surveillance soldiers on the border there were treated by their own was shocking.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/oct-7-radio-transmission-by-slain-surveillance-soldier-roni-eshel-aired-for-first-time/

Scirocco · 06/04/2024 17:49

"Sniffing a 5 year old girl's sock"... that's not a hobby, that sounds borderline paedophilic.

ScrollingLeaves · 06/04/2024 18:26

That is very strange.

Could it be he is treating the little girl’s sock like a mascot relic of innocence and hope, expecting lots of good luck and protection from death, in inverse proportion to the great evil and harm he and his kind are causing little children?

Or is he really just an paedophile with an extra fetish for feet?

Either way that is not ok.

He says he writes. I wonder what?

CrawlOut · 06/04/2024 18:53

Littlebowiepeep · 05/03/2024 08:34

@Dulra "I am engaging in a debate"

I'm glad you have the time - I have to go to work because feeding my family is more important than a conflict 2,000 miles away that I can't influence. 🙂

This kind of ‘argument’ is so so pathetic and embarrassing. It’s the sound bite of someone who has lost the debate.

Scirocco · 06/04/2024 18:54

ScrollingLeaves · 06/04/2024 18:26

That is very strange.

Could it be he is treating the little girl’s sock like a mascot relic of innocence and hope, expecting lots of good luck and protection from death, in inverse proportion to the great evil and harm he and his kind are causing little children?

Or is he really just an paedophile with an extra fetish for feet?

Either way that is not ok.

He says he writes. I wonder what?

Probably questionable author-insert fan fiction.

Dulra · 06/04/2024 18:58

ScrollingLeaves · 06/04/2024 18:26

That is very strange.

Could it be he is treating the little girl’s sock like a mascot relic of innocence and hope, expecting lots of good luck and protection from death, in inverse proportion to the great evil and harm he and his kind are causing little children?

Or is he really just an paedophile with an extra fetish for feet?

Either way that is not ok.

He says he writes. I wonder what?

Whatever the reason I would not let any man that admits to sniffing children's socks daily anywhere near my children. Creep

Kendodd · 07/04/2024 10:16

Scirocco · 06/04/2024 17:49

"Sniffing a 5 year old girl's sock"... that's not a hobby, that sounds borderline paedophilic.

I wonder if that child is now dead as well. 💔

FOJN · 07/04/2024 13:57

ConnieCounter · 06/04/2024 17:12

What the fuck is wrong with them?

Stealing a little girls sock and sniffing it suggests significantly disturbed thinking.

Posting it, without shame, on the internet is a whole other level of dysfunction. He clearly doesn't realise most of the world is going to wonder what the hell is going on in his head.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page