I'm back - first of all sorry for the appauling typos and spellings above!!! Doing things in too much of a rush.
Freedom - woohoo for the follie - stick that Dr Misery!
Best of luck, very excited for you!!!
Buzz - please don't worry, there will be an answer, Rabbit has wise words, things don't fail that quickly. I really really hope you feel you can come to the meet up. I would love to meet you.
.
Ok - so appointment today. Another huge cock up - when we arrived we were seen by the registrar who I deliberatly moved away from. This cock up was despite my numerous phone calls to check who I would be seen by. 
But he had a slightly better manor and said he was sorry we found ourselves back at clinic. 3 of us were there again, me, Mr Sar and Mother Sar
.
He said the last transfer was awkward which I knew but apparantly so was the first one - Nobody told me this!
. He said that I have a tight cervix which I sort of knew and the tranfers were getting harder. The tightness may be due to fibrosis (again one of those things many people have but unless they have fetility isses whould never be aware of because this in itself doesn't prevent natural conception). But also a tilted womb doesn't help and does contribute to the bends and tightness of the cervix. He said the act of the transfer themselves can further narrow the cervix by irritating any scar / fibrosis etc and that the act of putting a cathetar in a cervix such as mine can cause trauma by interfering with the natural wave pattern of the womb. Then when the embryo gets in there it gets spun around like crazy and struggles to implant. (poor little embies). They think this may have happened with me considering I had good embryo's.
I asked about my rash and he said the implantation / transfer process can decrease immunity a little and this is why I may pick up bugs around this time. He wasn't overly convinced I had immune issues as my bloods have shown no immue issues and have had a previous pregnancy.
I mentioned the hydrosalpinx - boak. Don't think it would have been mentioned otherwise. Interestingly he seemed to have forgotten all about this issue. But I was in the mood for tacking this shit head on.
I said "I don't believe I have one but I do believe I have prei-tubal adhesions" (endo at the ends of the tubes blocking the entrance etc). He said this was quite possible. I said "why has everyone always focued on me having a hydro when I have never had a PID or chlamydia and even those people that do have those only have an 8% chance of getting a hydro tube?". He agreed that I didn't fit this criteria but couldn't say for sure, either way. He also said there was a little uncertainty on my scans during the stimming phase of IVF that "something was there"(ie hydro). To which I said, "yes could that have been bowel?" - to which he replied "maybe".
This is all so perculiar because during my first cycle he was adament that I did have big hydos and my tubes needed to come out.
. He also told me the top consultant would have refused me IVF treatment if she had been sure I had hydros in place and would have forced the surgery route without choice.
. This was news to us, we were under the impression, I DID have a hydro and they were only allowing me to do IVF just to see if it might work anyway and appease me. I had no idea that the scary consultant wasn't convinced about the hydro either - that is not what it says in the report. These things have not been explained properly.
I said that I had studied HSG images and read articles and my HSG images did not look like typcal of hydro (I had a good luck at them as soon as I got over the shock of the pain which was unique to my HSG). I also told him that the hydro business has been driving me "INSANE, INSANE, INSANE" and in some ways has been worse than not getting pregnant.
To conclude, they want me to have cervical dilation. With out one, there is some risk the cervix opening may narrow some more and I could be in a situation where they can't get a cathetar in but have a living embryo waiting for me. But again, this is not certain and they will let me proceed to FET straight away if I want. But they think my chances will increase with a dilation.
This involves a general anasthetic and a 12 week waiting list. So I got all ballsy and said, "ok, if I have to have a general - do a lap as well!". Lets look inside once and for all (gulp, gulp, gulp)
to blast away any adhesions and assess the tubes etc. I said that they aren't allowed to remove any of my organs, but tidy up only! Please please God they won't find swollen hydro tubes. [gulp and gulp again].
Well done if you followed this. In summary the focus of failed implantation has shifted slightly to poor transfers (hope I am not clutching at straws). I am having a lap and cervix dilation in 12 weeks and then FET (please God assuming no hydo) 6 weeks after that. Phew. I am not worried about the actual operation - I love being on the happy drugs
. But I am worried about what they might find
. If there is a hydro at that point - well I guess I will have no choice but to accept that. I will read Rabbit's tips on laps.
Thank you for the congrats and good wishes on the new job. I start in Januray - how this fits in with a lap and FET - I have NO idea
. But we all know life is never easy, ay? During my interview I had a real, "don't give a shit" attitude
. I wasn't openly like this but that is how I felt inside. As a result, I was grilling them at the end and even read out a list of what I prefer to do in a clinical setting at work
. I felt I had nothing to lose and they can't hurt me after everything I have gone through - well it seemed to work. 
But thank you ladies for the continuing support of Sar's crazy jouney.
Hello to Euro and anyone else I may have missed.
This may be the last time I get to update before the meet up. I am leaving straight after work tomorrow to travel daaarn saaaarth! xxxx