Ok, so I'll attempt a proper post.....
I'm so jealous of the meet up, I would really love to meet you all.
Cosmos so glad you are feeling better gluten free. Isn't it great when something actually works? I did gluten free years ago just for a couple of weeks when I got heart burn from nowhere. The heart burn disappeared and weirdly didn't return. Frannie based on my experience anyway, it might be worth a shot even if just short term. I found it a bit of a drag, my wheat eating is mainly grabbing a sandwich when running around, rice really helped me out that and being a bit more organised meal-wise.
critter lovely story about your friend's adoption. Even in the States where the systems and attitudes are more friendly to transracial adoption it's true that non-white children get placed less quickly than white children. In the UK many LA are against it so even when there is willingness on the part of adopters placements don't happen (this is changing slowly). It's a complex area but in my opinion this thinking needs to change much faster. Black children spend at least a year extra in care in the UK.
Gin are you feeling any better? I hope there are less snotty tissues.
mrsd on protocols ...so my understanding is that there is a general movement towards short protocols which are more pleasant for patients and may produce better pregnancy rates particularly for older patients, lower ovarian reserve (often related, of course) and (I read once) lower BMI. As I understand it this is due (in part at least) to sensitivity to the long deep suppression of the Long Protocol, meaning (I think) it's possible to go too far, if your ovaries are over-suppressed, the stimulating medications will not work as they should. Short Protocols are more tricky for the clinic to run, the more suppression, the easier to schedule treatments, arguably the more limited the ability to schedule the greater the chance to pregnancy rates being compromised overall. A couple of examples: less predictability can result in too many retrievals in one day or more likely have retrievals to occur on a weekend when many clinics would be less staffed and standards of care can, arguably, be affected. Some doctors still base their treatment around the LP where they continue to see the best pregnancy rates over all. It this related the fact they are the 'easiest' to run? I think the answer must be yes, at least in part.
My doctor uses LP and antagonist (which is a SP). He describes to his patients as follows - LP injections over longer period, slightly higher pregnancy rates, SP injections over a shorter period, slightly lower pregnancy rates. He does more than 70% on LP which is where he is most comfortable. Cases on the antagonist included for him, those who based on his description choose SP, those for whom LP hadn't worked in the past, those who came in when their period have already started and wanted to start on that cycle (yes, really). Mr Doll said afterwards he was starting to get confused about who was the actual doctor as I tried to engage him in discussions (again) regarding individual profiles and protocol choice. The bottom line is that my ovarian reserve is not known (this is rather annoying as he didn't want to do it last time I saw him and now cites as a reason for sticking with the LP) and I have no history of stimulated meds to use as a guide. He doesn't seem to see my age alone as a reason to avoid LP (BMI seems to mean nothing to him in this context).
I realise that this most not sound like the perfect circumstances to be doing IVF but I'm very used to doing a lot of things in less than ideal conditions as a consequence of mine and Mr Doll's professional life and I find I can deal with that. The doctor said I can 'just choose' which protocol I 'want'. I reiterated that everything I have read and understand leads my away from the LP, but at the same time I'm not sure protocol choice can be taking in isolation from the bigger picture. He is most confident that this is the best shot based on his experience, in this clinic, over a long period of time. The most likely outcome is this doesn't work which may or may not indicate changing the protocol. I'm more comfortable with a failure this way than after a 'my choice' version from Google.
Damn, sorry long.
nelly nice work on the illicit shag. When does the flare cycle start? I'm surprised it matters. But then again this is coming from the wild west of IVF where this was never mentioned along with lifestyle being never mentioned, possible side effects of drugs never mentioned, how to inject never mentioned.... I walked out with a piece of paper to take to "any pharmacy" for my down regging drugs. Bought them, still have the paper, which is not dated and can therefore be used to buy as many rounds as I like. It's a doping drug, apparently according to the International Olympic Committee, so I could start a business, right?
buzzyI remember you saying don't rush into anything last week. Yep, brilliant aren't I? princess I think my doctor is the middle eastern cousin of "chill out", this one is "rock up, buy some drugs, no biggy"
euro great news on your health check, I hope the 2 weeks go by quickly for you. Speaking for 2 weeks, you are 2ww cycle-wise, right?
rabbit self indulgent?? Get out. I'm so so sorry love, this was a mental one. Fucking hell, an internet free holiday prevented me from pages on here on my three fat folly cycle. Sorry too about the heavy bleeding. Just get though today the best you can.
artemis well done on the injecting, doing it yourself I take it? (Mr Doll is doing mine)
freedom silly doctor, slow indeed.
mrsd sorry things are still unclear. Thinking of you.
sar rum joy heart and all, sorry I've gone on and on..... x