Wow, you ladies have been busy on here. I've had a busy couple of days - gynae, then friend's 50th(!) on Friday, shooting and then packing for a work trip yesterday. I have a couple of hours to chill out now and then I am off for a while. Hopefully I will have some bored time in hotel rooms time for MNing while I am gone!
mrsm thanks for your reassurance. The odd thing is that I think I would probably be fine with the lletz as I usually heal well, but I just object to their readiness to chop and slice. I have only ever had two abnormal smears - taken two weeks apart in June and both within a month of finishing 6 months of steroids specifically to supress my immune system.
My appointment yesterday was fine. He fairly strongly recommended lletz there and then but accepted that I wasn't doing anything risky by seeing if it clears up by itself. I was quite surprised how strongly he pushed it given the statistics show that a mild abnormality has a teeny tiny chance of turning into cancer. Anyway, I suggested that he do the colposcopy (last time he couldn't see the area where abnormalities usually reside because the IVF drugs had made it disappear) and if he saw anything he felt the need to biopsy he could, and if he saw anything that concerned him and he felt went beyond a mild abnormality, we could revisit the question of lletz. So he repeated the colposcopy and... the area where abnormalities usually reside was still hiding! He said it could be an after effect of the drugs but that some women are just like that. But all of the area he could see looked perfectly healthy (again) so after that, he was quite happy for me to leave it for 3 months. So I am quite happy with how it went. I got the outcome I wanted. But I am a bit unsettled by how strongly he was pushing treatment. He is an oncologist, so I am wondering if he is a bit like my paediatrician friend who is massively anti homebirth because she only ever sees the results of ones that go wrong with the babies being bluelighted in, and he sees the people who have cervical cancer and all the effects that it has and so wants to be massively conservative about treatment. Anyway, I will now see him again in Feb, and have my work medical (with smear) next month and my NHS smear in December, so I can keep a close eye on it every 3 months.
One good thing was that I had a positive OPK before I went so I knew I was about to ov. Since August last year, I havent' had any obvious EWCM. I used to get loads of it. On the screen, it was quite obvious that there was loads of EWCM right in my cervix. So it looks like I am still producing it (although perhaps not in the quantities that i used to) but it is hiding.
mrsm I've stuck to paracetemol in the 2ww. It's probably overcautious (it certainly was with hindsight as I wasn't bloody pregnant!) but I think certain cold and flu drugs can have quite nasty effects if taken during pregnancy.
gin HAPPY BIRTHDAY!
Nelly your "pissed ramblings" echoed my thoughts. I wish we could have started earlier. Maybe things would have been different. Meh. But as others on here have said, plenty of people with low AMH readings go on to have natural or IVF pregnancies. There are loads of success stories out there. What timing for the birth of your niece! At least any tears can be easily disguised as tears of joy on such occasions. I'm glad you survived the visit.