Morning! Two good nights so I feel human again. Thanks for all congrats!
Apologies in advance for the essay... The appointment on Monday was very odd
I saw the registrar not our consultant and asked for skin prick allergy testing. Then we went to see the dietician. In the meantime the reg spoke to the con who said no to testing. Dietician opened the file (where the 'no' was recorded) raised her eyebrows and retook all his history (again). At the end she said 'why on earth has she said no? He's having type 1 allergic reactions'. So the upshot is, the reg came back, admitted she'd probably not told the consultant about his reactions in quite the same terms I had used and he's being referred for skin prick testing.
The saga continues though as we had to go back to the gp to get the referral for that. When I said what I wanted (again having gone through his history again again again!) He said 'so what are you hoping to achieve by this?' 
Erm... what?! To see if he's allergic to anything, or at least the most common allergens, says I, with a face like this
. He said 'but he's already weaning, he must have a range of things you know he can safely eat?' Yes, seven things says I
He said it was an awful lot to put a baby through. Less than an anaphylactic reaction says I
. To be fair, it's unlikely, but not outside the bounds of possibility as he's already having type 1 reactions.
So we're onto a new regime (suggested by the consultant who didn't think there was a need for testing initially
) where we try new foods only within office hours (for better ambulance times) and with a bottle of piriton to hand. But she didn't want to panic me
. I spent so much time with my eyebrows raised on Monday that they hurt by the end of the day!
Anyway, we tried fish yesterday under the new regime and that was fine - another one down! 