toddlerwrangle, sorry i didn't mean to make it sound like a dead cert, oops.
However i do feel the risks are under played, especially by the "well mine are alright" brigade. Because, to be completely brutal about it, you don't know they are alright.
It isn't imo fairer to say that issues may effect some children, as some associated problems don't show up till adulthood.
And you don't know how many nights of minor but helish toddler illness might have been avoided by bf.
i have no doubt that we are still uncovering the risks of ff. New studies are done all the time.
Yes ff is the right choice for some mothers. But this choice needs to be made will full information.
No one should be told (as i have heard on here) that ff is just as good as bm. Your kids may seen alright but who knows what might happen to the lo's of the person being misled at that nonsense. I could not live with giving that sort of "advice"
If i ffed and my child developed am associated condition i would want to know that i had decided to ff after propely weighing the evidence. And by evidence i don't mean the laughinglil kind.
I agree with mollycuddles. Full info about making up formula should be on the formula.
Why this is so difficult for formula manufacturers is beyond me. Well, i have my suspicions.
To give bf mothers unsolicited info re ff is to reinforce the society wide impression that bf is "not enough", that they will "want" or "need" to ff at some point, and that ff is the norm. 