e14mum,
[rant]I know what you mean about the way the media report any healthy or science stories. They often twist findings to make things seem like a big breakthrough when it's just part of ongoing research and nobody really knows for sure yet. There are far too many reporters working in science journalism who don't appear to even have a rudimentary understanding of science and its methods. I took 2 science subjects to leaving-school level (so not even a degree) and I can't believe the shit I'm expected to swallow. Of course the way research gets funding means that press releases send out encourage this way of looking at science stories, so unless a reporter really knows their stuff it is easy for them to be fooled into reporting nonsense.
I actually disagree with you on the guidelines being published on the stricter/safer side. Adults should be treated as such and any official guidelines that need to be released should not be drawn up until there is solid evidence that what they are recommending is necessary. Having "experts" drawing up spurious guidelines that then become official government recommendations is pernicious in that it hectors (and often confuses) those that are trying their best, and has sod all effect on those that ignore any such guidelines anyway.
wrt to pregnancy this stuff gets into the realms of the truly psychotic, with us being essentially told that most food is poison.
The peanuts issue is a particular case in point. I was recommended by my midwife not to eat peanuts in pregnancy even though she couldn't even tell me why not, other than that there might possibly be some link to kids getting allergies. I know other women who've been advised by medical professionals not to eat any nuts at all!
Basically at this stage, other than only drinking the odd glass of wine I have now given up on all other food bans. [/rant]
Whew, nearly lost the run of myself there. Hope the scan went well Lauren