Evening all!
I think we'll def. get through this thread before Xmas...and no babies will arrive...and it WILL NOT SNOW until June...watch me be proved wrong...
I was thinking about life insurance the other day cakes. I don't have a will either, but am totally happy for everything (well, I basically have nothing) to go to DH, and he knows I DO NOT want a Christian funeral at all (the default in the the UK is a Christian funeral BTW)...as do all my family...so well, I figured that'll suffice for now. My household insurance is due in Jan, so I will be asking for quotes for life insurance this week.
Shit, that's another thing to do...and another expense. BAH! Who needs to be in the black eh!?
Missed my antenatal class last week thanks to the contractions and hospital stay, so was all nervous about today's class. Turned up, so did most others...except the Health Visitor didn't...bloody typical. THe HV team knew about the class, and just "forgot" to find a relacement, or contact the MW team, or the Children's Centre and thus us. They've re-booked for next week, but some can't make it and frankly, why should we...and why should all the Dads take another afternoon off unpaid/lieu (a whole day for mine as MW appt is AM) just to be spouted a lod of inaccurate stats and blatant bollocks at by some not always well-meaning loony?!* Bloody incompetent.
*I've sat in a meeting where HVs were discussing stats over something, a virus I think. These figures (it was about 5 years ago) aren't exact but it was something along the lines of: There was a 0.01% of the virus being caught in 0-2y/o populous, BUT for 40% of the 0.01% it was a serious thing (implying 60% of the 0.01% got it, but were fine)...that could lead to various complications if not picked up quickly, and (easily) treated, something like 10% of the populous not treated promptly had "serious" complications, but as most were treated promptly it was ok! Instead of taking the "reassuring Mums it was thus, comparatively rare, very treatable, but to look out for it" approach, they were going with the "40% of babies were at risk of getting this thing and thus dying or at best having serious complications". I actually interejected at this point and told them they'd seriously misunderstood the statistics and walked them through it...as a guest speaker on a different topic. Don't think they liked me, especially not the head HV lady who was just purely angry..and my collegue who was highly embarrased...but seriously?! THAT stupid, not one of them spotted their initial error, let alone the rest of what they were suggesting?!