Not firing on all cylinders now.
Glad the thread has calmed down a bit!
Alexa yes I'm sure we are on same page so now it goes into a conversation hopefully!
I'm not a historian. In fact I hated history at school, because of my teachers probably. And because I have a poor memory.
Anyway this bit.
'That is self evident. However, I think the two are indivisible. We cannot properly understand what is going on in Syria or many other conflict zones right now without understanding the historical context, and we cannot respond appropriately if we do not understand. That is why history is important in my view.'
The respond appropriately thing bothers me. I really am shit at history and that but my understanding is that our interference in areas we didn't know about. Has either caused or exacerbated problems.
And when I say 'our' I suppose I mean the West generally including the USA.
Every time we step in we seem to cause more problems than were there before. I know it's way more complicated than that.
And the whole WW2 thing bothers me. Yes it was awful. Yes what the Nazis did was horrendous. I went to the Berlin museum 'topography of terror' last year on the place where the SS & Gestapo HQ were. It was just so affecting. Had to leave TBH.
But do we learn? No. Even in Europe. A poster here says it's more important to know about Hiroshima than Srebrenica or Syria. I just don't get that. Srebrenica was recent. Ethnic cleansing. Mass murder. Rape as a weapon of war. In Europe. In the 90s. So 'we' learnt nothing. Ethnic cleansing of the rohingya people. Mass murder. Torture. Villages burnt. Rape.
But apparently it's really important to know all about Ww2. More important than knowing about stuff happening now. Because only by understanding WW2 will we be able to stop it happening again...
Bothers me, this attitude. It really does.