So why did he lie for? Since he was so against lying and there was always one rule for him and one rule for everyone else
FFS, who cares at this point. As explained ad nauseam by every poster so far, this has nothing to do with getting more time with your DD, getting your DD back or any other way of moving forward. The kicker is you still live with him 10 years later, seemingly unable to house yourself, work, or independently provide for the child you do have.
I think people can now see what a court saw at the time. Everyone familiar with the Australian family court system knows it would have been an extremely high bar to completely remove a child from, not one, but both parents. Your posts have provided a likely insight into why they made the decisions they did.
Also, in no Australian State is there no equivalent of CPS, of course there is. Your claim that there is not, is false. Every State has had this for as long as I have been alive and I’m probably old enough to be your mum. Ditto, your claim there is no website or internet for this sort of thing 🤯. Again, yes, yes there is. A quick Google would sort that out for you. Just because your parents went away on holidays and didn’t do this for you (Googling, and contacting CPS equivalent in your State/Territory, or contacting Legal Aid) does not mean these services did not/do not exist. Again, I think this plays into understanding why the courts made the decision they did. Honestly, I wouldn’t go back to court now. I imagine that blathering on about your father and a car (especially as you still seem to need to live with your father for some reason), would likely be the cherry on top for them advising you never seeing your child again. And again, you won’t see or understand why.