I'm not a Catholic and it's true that the current news stories don't make me more likely to join that Church.
But this is something you need to work out with your dh. And tbh I do think it's a disproportionate reaction. Why was the Church looking after so many children? - because Jesus said that every child is important, whatever gender, however young, however unwanted, whatever they are like. That was a radical statement then, and it's a radical statement now.
Did you read an article a few weeks ago by a Chinese journalist who was staying with a rural family in China when a girl was born? The baby was thrown in a bucket to die.
I'll say it again, the baby was thrown in a bucket to die.
Because she was a girl (and possibly IIRC because she had a disability), and because the one-child policy is effectively enforced in rural areas; there was simply no way the family could afford to keep that baby if she couldn't contribute her full years of work, and if she needed a dowry.
Are you going to refuse to buy anything from China as a result?
The quickest way to make Catholic children unsafe is for people who are not abusers to leave the church and abandon it to those who do see any community organisation as a quick route to unsupervised children.
If your dh is willing to take your children to mass, and to do whatever you require of him to keep them safe, then I do think he has a case to pass on his own faith to them.
TBH it's a bit odd to have Christians saying they will 'tar and feather' convicted paedophiles/those who covered up. Justice, yes, but what about hating the sin and loving the sinner?