I think the option of children is implicit in marriage, unless otherwise agreed. Before a friend of mine married her boyfriend they discussed having children and he said he didn't want them very soon. She has just turned 40 and he is still the condom king. I wouldn't call her morally deficient in any way at all if she got on with it (although actually he seems to have that department pretty well covered - funny that).
The posters on here seem to be talking about discussions over baby no. 2 or 3 or more. What if you are facing a childless future like I was? Everyone seems to be defending the poor menfolk who would be so unfairly 'lumbered' with these kids.
Personally I was willing to walk away from my relationship if he hadn't agreed to a baby (he's now almost surgically attached to my swelling belly like nothing else existed).
This must be the only mnet thread where the man's right is so sacred. Or is the 'leave him he sounds like a loser' group elsewhere?
I know, for sure, that 2 of my friends did this, not because they are mean, manipulative women but because they despaired with the procrastination and, knowing their (very long-standing) partners well, knew it would be ok.
Men are not designed to want babies the way women are. Why would they be? They are designed to fall in love with it when they see it.
I would only think badly of women who did it on purpose where there was no proper, stable relationship and the man never has a chance to bring up the child.