I have been watching this thread, and was a bit apprehensive of posting. Sorry it?s a bit of a long one. Where I?m coming from is that I?m 37 weeks with my first, had no idea this was an issue for mums, and am familiar with the RADAR scheme because my SIL uses a wheelchair and has one of the keys.
Anyways?my understanding is that, using the social model of disability followed by the UK?s Disabled People?s Movement, the preferred term is ?accessible toilet?. So it would seem that the key point is who are these toilets intended to be accessible to? If a RADAR key is needed, then fairly apparent they were intended to be accessible to disabled people, so not really for others to use? If they have a baby changing station, then clearly intended to be accessible to people changing babies. For the others, it seems a bit of a grey area to me.
While there seems to be a broad consensus here from disabled parents and parents of disabled children that accessible toilets should only be for disabled people, when I received my disability equality training from two disabled people from a centre for independent living, their view was much more relaxed, and they made it clear that they had no problem with non-disabled people using an empty accessible loo when other loos were full. A lot of the thrust of the lobbying done by the Disabled People?s Movement has been to make the point that it is not just disabled people who face barriers from society, so, for example, mums with pushchairs benefit from ramps, accessible public transport and so on.
I just wanted to flag that there are other opinions out there. As others have said, the disabled vs non-disabled tone of some of the posts does sadden me. And if we think about our ageing population, with already more over 65s than under 16s, it?s pretty clear there are going to need to be a lot more accessible loos available if we are not going to see a lot more disabled people who have issues around urgency of access - rather than necessarily needing the extra space that the original post seems to be about ? being unable to confidently go out in public. It?s sounding as if the current system only just about works because there aren?t many disabled people out and about, which is a) a pretty sad reflection of the curtailed lives that some disabled people still lead and b) likely to be changing dramatically over the coming years, whatever mums with prams do. I think that?s something we should all be concerned about, no? And if as a fringe benefit mums with prams can have a bit more dignity and comfort, surely nobody would begrudge that?