Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AiBU to get fed up of people running our schools down.

196 replies

Washandblowdryplease · 20/10/2026 14:09

I get that not every school is perfect and people have specific and individual issues with this or that. However, every thread on education seems to take it for granted that our system is dreadful. In the 3 big global rankings we are currently placed 4th, 6th, and 16th. We are in the top 10 for all 3 subjects compared by PISA scores. To me that suggests that we actually have a pretty decent system.

We also have 4 of the top 10 universities and are ranked 2nd for research quality in higher education.

Links provided so that you can see the data yourself

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/education-rankings-by-country

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/best-countries-for-education

https://www.topuniversities.com/university-subject-rankings/education-training

Education Rankings by Country 2026

Denmark ranks #1 for education quality in 2026.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/education-rankings-by-country

OP posts:
Octavia64 · 20/10/2026 16:14

scoutzx · 20/10/2026 15:56

Okay, but what about the children coming to mainstream primary schools who aren’t toilet trained? This issue (along with many others) is increasing year on year.

Yes, this is an issue.

it’s surprisingly hard to get genuine data on it though, not least because many 4 year olds are really not entirely reliably toilet trained (either now or in the past).

i worked in a primary in the 2000s and every year the reception teacher asked for new parents to send in a spare set of clothes for the children because there were inevitable accidents.

she’d send the class to the toilets in pairs before morning break, before lunch and before afternoon break, and the class had it’s own loos integrated into the reception area (which is standard as many 4 year olds need the loo at short notice).

most of the children in reception had an accident at some point in the year to be honest and some had multiple accidents. But officially they were all toilet trained.

we didn’t have any children in nappies but we did have children with bowel issues - some with allergies, one with crohns - who sometimes needed a whole change.

most 4 year olds are somewhere on the toilet training journey but few are completely reliable. I’d guess that these days there are more who are less reliable as parents tend to start later these days, but most parents are aware that schools expect children to be toilet trained and I’d expect most of the ones that start in nappies to have significant other issues.

JoJoyful · 20/10/2026 16:17

From the School Threads here I read of a great deal of disruption to do with children with the inability to be quiet or generally behave. Much is explained by Autism or ADHD. Do we need to re assess the policy of keeping all children together in mainstream education.
One thread I read yesterday a woman was so upset and was feeling a failure because her child was just refusing to go to school. Another boy was getting many detentions and isolation. He said he did not understand the questions.
Is this really the best way of coping with all this? That little boy must be having a miserable time.
(My children are grown up and had a quiet time. So I have not seen much of this myself.)

scoutzx · 20/10/2026 16:19

Octavia64 · 20/10/2026 16:14

Yes, this is an issue.

it’s surprisingly hard to get genuine data on it though, not least because many 4 year olds are really not entirely reliably toilet trained (either now or in the past).

i worked in a primary in the 2000s and every year the reception teacher asked for new parents to send in a spare set of clothes for the children because there were inevitable accidents.

she’d send the class to the toilets in pairs before morning break, before lunch and before afternoon break, and the class had it’s own loos integrated into the reception area (which is standard as many 4 year olds need the loo at short notice).

most of the children in reception had an accident at some point in the year to be honest and some had multiple accidents. But officially they were all toilet trained.

we didn’t have any children in nappies but we did have children with bowel issues - some with allergies, one with crohns - who sometimes needed a whole change.

most 4 year olds are somewhere on the toilet training journey but few are completely reliable. I’d guess that these days there are more who are less reliable as parents tend to start later these days, but most parents are aware that schools expect children to be toilet trained and I’d expect most of the ones that start in nappies to have significant other issues.

“and I’d expect most of the ones that start in nappies to have significant other issues.”

A significant number of children without special educational needs or medical diagnoses are arriving at primary school in nappies or pull-ups.

clary · 20/10/2026 16:20

frozendaisy · 20/10/2026 15:54

@clary
as balance balance
our youngster prefers some of his teachers to us 😀(his drama teacher can do NO WRONG for example) there are others - even teachers of subjects he doesn’t take!

He doesn’t even want to study acting.

Yeh my DC loved some of their teachers. DS2 really rated his maths teachers (A level maths) and DD was a big fan of her teachers for Eng lit and geog A level and still speaks of them fondly, seven years later.

I had some teachers whom I liked as well tbh. But I don’t think they worked as hard at being teachers in the 1970s and 80s as I had to in the 2000s

Boomer55 · 20/10/2026 16:22

Tablesandchairs23 · 20/10/2026 14:29

Schools in the uk are a abysmal. They're failing our kids.

Yes. It’s like the NHS. Not the fault of individual teachers/nurses, but failing us all.

Tarttat1n · 20/10/2026 16:28

Boomer55 · 20/10/2026 16:22

Yes. It’s like the NHS. Not the fault of individual teachers/nurses, but failing us all.

Ofsted and PISA say otherwise.90% of schools are rated good or outstanding.

AgeingMillennial · 20/10/2026 16:29

Icedvanillacoffee · 20/10/2026 16:11

@AgeingMillennial
True about Send spending. I was a sendco, no one ever asked me what the problem was but its pretty simple really, the things that are in Ehcps and the accepted "support" techniques are not evidence based. They dont work.
Plus there are young people with extreme behaviour issues who would have been in prison when I started teaching in the 90s but because of different government policies are no longer given custodial sentences. We are talking about violent assaults with weapons, rape and armed robbery. Schools cant cope with these sorts of problems.
And there are more children with real disabilities who can not thrive in mainstream. Very very few people working in cahms or NHS or schools have any understanding of the depths of the problems. And schools are burdened with experts who dont work in them who have the power to insist on the failed techniques being used again and again. Vicious and very expensive circle. I made a huge number of enemies pointing out all these pretty obvious problems.
On the plus side I did see kids who had been through hideous trauma bravely deal with all sorts of things and try their best every day.
Secondary schools despite the problems are generally happy places where most inmates enjoy their time! I did.

That’s really interesting. Which techniques specifically would you say are ineffective?

Octavia64 · 20/10/2026 16:33

Tarttat1n · 20/10/2026 16:28

Ofsted and PISA say otherwise.90% of schools are rated good or outstanding.

As a teacher I would not consider ofsted ratings thd be all and rnd all.

they have boxes that need to be ticked. You can tick them without being a great school and equally some great schools choose not to tick certain boxes

RaggedRocks · 20/10/2026 16:38

Far-left agitators

C152 · 20/10/2026 17:10

Washandblowdryplease · 20/10/2026 14:37

The stats say they aren't.

Parental perception that anything other than perfection for every single child is an issue. Also parents think a school is failing if their child getting the grades that the parents think they deserve.

It's my understanding that the stats say that there hasn't actually been significant improvement; other countries have just got worse.

And as for some posters who think it's all the fault of "inclusion" - other high ranking countries have significantly stronger and more comprehensive inclusion policies than the UK, whilst maintaining high PISA rankings.

https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/celebrate-englands-school-rankings-but-estonia-teaches-a-better-lesson

Celebrate England’s school rankings, but Estonia teaches ...

Celebrate England’s school rankings, but Estonia teaches ...

While Michael Gove is cheering new Pisa figures as a win for traditionalists, Baltic creativity is putting the exam-factory approach in the shade

https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/celebrate-englands-school-rankings-but-estonia-teaches-a-better-lesson

Weeellokthen · 20/10/2026 17:44

MerryAquaKoala · 20/10/2026 14:59

Yes. Scotland And Wales didn't do as well as England on the Pisa rankings. They have different governments managing (or not) their education systems. And it shows.

Meanwhile the zealots don't think our children are the main priority when it comes to spending our taxes. 🤔

AgeingMillennial · 20/10/2026 17:45

Weeellokthen · 20/10/2026 17:44

Meanwhile the zealots don't think our children are the main priority when it comes to spending our taxes. 🤔

But everyone wants to be the priority and are outraged when they’re not
Pensioners
The disabled
Refugees
Children
VAWG

Weeellokthen · 20/10/2026 17:47

JacknDiane · 20/10/2026 14:57

Well it must have changed. My kids went through the state system to masters degree level. Now they both have decent jobs.

In what way is your child being failed in school? Id appreciate experience, not links to statistics.

As a whole our schools are failing our kids. If we cannot go by statistics how do we measure success?
Well done to your kids btw 😁

cityliving99 · 20/10/2026 18:16

Boomer55 · 20/10/2026 16:22

Yes. It’s like the NHS. Not the fault of individual teachers/nurses, but failing us all.

But most schools are not failing the majority of pupils. Many parents are failing their children and then expect schools to solve all their problems.
It’s easy to blame schools.
i hear many complaints from teenagers about their parents. And many parents do not support schools.

dizzydizzydizzy · 20/10/2026 18:30

AgeingMillennial · 20/10/2026 14:44

YANBU. I don’t see any real difference in schools, I see a difference in the children attending them who are unable to cope with normal day to day life.

My daughter’s primary is a regular state one and has a vegetable patch, forest school, a range of interesting clubs, lovely teachers, they do interesting things. Very kind and supportive.

Problem is the kids need the moon on a stick and ever expanding and more time consuming adjustments to simply set foot over the threshold.

I wonder if the ‘difference in children’ you are seeing is actually a difference in schools. In the past, children were expected to fit in and get on - some suffered in silence, some got punished for being lazy or naughty, some became school refusers, came out of school not being able to read etc. They were struggling but their needs were not recognized or accommodated.

The recent Fonagy report on ADHD and autism commented that mental distress in children was genuine.

Your daughter’s school sounds lovely. And of course it is entirely possible that they are making accommodations that are unnecessary.

Hummingbird233 · 20/10/2026 18:36

scoutzx · 20/10/2026 14:35

Parents are failing their kids first.

Totally agree. From where I stand, it’s the parents who have no boundaries and expectations on children.

MagnoliaParks · 20/10/2026 18:43

Nottodaybob · 20/10/2026 15:45

I don't think results are a good measure how well a school treats it's children, prepares them for the future or nurtures them. I also think too much emphasis is placed on academic attainment and not enough on them being well rounded, resilient people.

Schools cutting things like domestic science, art programmes and anything that doesn't lead to an exam is not good for children

I'm far more concerned about them being independent, mentally robust and capable than I am about fantastic exam scores.

And so yes, I do believe our education system is failing our children. And no I don't believe my child is entitled to a particular grade - I do think they are entitled to be curious and inquisitive and explore subjects beyond what is needed for an exam.

Luckily children only spend 52% days of the year in school.

Schools are there to educate for exams. Almost half of their time is spent at home and that half of the time can be spent on domestic science, art, independence and many other things that don’t lead to exams.

frozendaisy · 20/10/2026 18:45

Hummingbird233 · 20/10/2026 18:36

Totally agree. From where I stand, it’s the parents who have no boundaries and expectations on children.

Totally agree

How we are not further down that list is testament to the work most teachers go above and beyond doing, not their failings.

AgeingMillennial · 20/10/2026 18:47

dizzydizzydizzy · 20/10/2026 18:30

I wonder if the ‘difference in children’ you are seeing is actually a difference in schools. In the past, children were expected to fit in and get on - some suffered in silence, some got punished for being lazy or naughty, some became school refusers, came out of school not being able to read etc. They were struggling but their needs were not recognized or accommodated.

The recent Fonagy report on ADHD and autism commented that mental distress in children was genuine.

Your daughter’s school sounds lovely. And of course it is entirely possible that they are making accommodations that are unnecessary.

I didn’t say it wasn’t genuine.

Of course they struggled in the past. But they developed a harder shell so even if they didn’t leave with great exam results they would just knuckle down and get a NMW job.

Now everyone is super sensitive and unable to do anything unless it’s exactly what they want.

LlynTegid · 20/10/2026 18:50

Agree with those who highlight the failings of many parents.
Agree that many if not most teachers are dedicated and having to deal with the results of non-parenting.

Still think that for a variety of reasons, education is not as good as it was. Two things I think have been significant- the ending of O levels and a poor replacement (good idea, poor execution), and the drive for more people to be at university and making apprenticeships seem an outcome of failure.

Owninterpreter · 20/10/2026 18:51

MagnoliaParks · 20/10/2026 18:43

Luckily children only spend 52% days of the year in school.

Schools are there to educate for exams. Almost half of their time is spent at home and that half of the time can be spent on domestic science, art, independence and many other things that don’t lead to exams.

they arent just for exams. Exams are a way to evidence what you have learned but there is merit in learning without doing an exam at the end. Children stop a lot of subjects when they pick thier options but the stuff they learned to that point still has value. My ds has sen and hasn't done many exams. Just english and maths functional skills but he still did lots of other things that help him take an active role in society and hopefully employment. They couldnt all be done at home.

And you can do exams in art and food.

Nottodaybob · 20/10/2026 19:18

MagnoliaParks · 20/10/2026 18:43

Luckily children only spend 52% days of the year in school.

Schools are there to educate for exams. Almost half of their time is spent at home and that half of the time can be spent on domestic science, art, independence and many other things that don’t lead to exams.

And that is exactly what I think is wrong with education today and why I think schools are failing children.

And why I think society at large is falling children.

Parents have equally more AND less time with their kids due to the way society has developed. Few families have a main care giver at home and children spend longer in childcare than ever before. The time they do spend with parents/ at home is expected to be "quality time" and children are doing more activities and less functional tasks - because we are told activities help educational prospect and "good" parents do that for their kids. As a society we no longer consider good parenting to be allowing our 7,8,9 year olds out to the park by themselves. As a result children are less capable of resolving problems - in friendships and in doing tasks like crossing roads and putting on coats. For the sake of ease and speed (including in school) most shoes are velcro rather than laces. Few primary age children do any meaningful chores - lots can't cook because parents are afraid that a visit to a&e for a burn will mean a social services referral and expecting children to do laundry grow the lawn is practically neglect.

GladViewer · 20/10/2026 20:13

hopspot · 20/10/2026 15:40

Completely agree. A child currently operating at an 18mth age gets nothing from being in a y2 classroom for example. The other children can’t concentrate and the child themselves is being failed.

I’ve wondered about this too. There are 7 SEND kids in my dc’s class and in the (albeit limited) times I’ve observed the class the teacher seems overwhelmed. The school is well rated and and has high attainment rates but it became apparent very quickly that those attaining high grades are in the main getting outside tuition from very early on, and I think that’s masking how much the school is struggling. It’s my only experience of the current school system so I’m no position to comment on the uk as a whole, but in my area at least tutoring is big business, from all the primary schools in the area. Funding is also a huge issue, parents had to fundraiser a new boiler etc for the school as the old one kept being ‘fixed’ which only ever last two mins.

Goldenbear · 20/10/2026 21:05

AgeingMillennial · 20/10/2026 15:50

But there isn’t ’academic pressure’. They may feel like school is somehow stressful but there’s no evidence the actual pressure is worse. They don’t get Saturday detentions, or called thick, ‘all behaviour is communication’, there’s so much tailored support and chances to resit.

I think they’re less resilient and therefore school seems more stressful.

What is this 'tailored support' you talk of, not unless you are worth it as academically exceptional or have SEND. Equally, past papers are not given out at every school, just more encouragement to go on a screen and find them in your own time and actually revision lessons are useless if that's not how you learn I.e. with the noise and disruption of the rest of the class but no choice to revise at home even though you are 16!

Performance targets,

Goldenbear · 20/10/2026 21:09

Performance targets, data analytics, a neglect of the Arts, AI lessons and marking. No more support for pupils than in my 90s comp just lip service to this.