Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be glad triple lock going and hope they means test it too

1000 replies

Randomamsi · 29/09/2026 19:50

I have a multi millionaire senior relative who receives £1,400 from the state pension each month, in addition to 6k private pension.

He's not means tested and he's received that for 30 years. Yes, he paid into the system but he does not need it!!! He also had free uni, dirt cheap first house back in the 60s and retired aged 59.

Meanwhile the younger generation:

  • thousands in student loan debt
  • asset poor as can't get on the housing ladder
  • means tested for child benefit, tax free childcare etc
  • working until late 60s/ 70s

Why do pensioners have it easy while younger ones pay the price?

For vulnerable pensioners at risk of poverty, there should obviously be provision to help them, I'm not suggesting we let people starve. But multimillionaire pensioners or very asset rich pensioners do NOT need the state pension. It's about time things changed.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Differentforgirls · 30/09/2026 12:16

SerendipityJane · 30/09/2026 11:56

Since it can pay out far more than was ever paid in, it's a benefit.

Which other benefits do you pay into?

Constantrunner · 30/09/2026 12:18

SerendipityJane · 30/09/2026 12:15

A lot of pensioners will receive more than they paid in.

Scroungers.

And a lot will receive less

BIossomtoes · 30/09/2026 12:21

PigletJohn · 30/09/2026 12:13

It's not as simple as you think, either.

My understanding is that whether you get the old or new state pension is determined by date of birth.

PigletJohn · 30/09/2026 12:23

BIossomtoes · 30/09/2026 12:21

My understanding is that whether you get the old or new state pension is determined by date of birth.

But the amount of money you get is not as simple as you think.

That reminds me. Ask for a pension forecast.

ExpectMore · 30/09/2026 12:24

OneFastPinkTraybake · 30/09/2026 11:48

Some people with disabilities. People with caring responsibilities.

Disabled are excluded as they should be covered by disability benefits. Perhaps caring should be treated similarly eg akin to NI credits

Differentforgirls · 30/09/2026 12:24

SerendipityJane · 30/09/2026 12:15

A lot of pensioners will receive more than they paid in.

Scroungers.

Well aren't you lovely.

ExpectMore · 30/09/2026 12:25

BIossomtoes · 30/09/2026 11:41

People of low intelligence who will only ever be able to do low paid jobs. They don’t choose that - who would?

I don’t think it’s fair to destine those with low intelligence to low pay. I’m seen some particularly low IQ folk in senior roles. Similarly high IQ not needed in many roles eg recruitment

BIossomtoes · 30/09/2026 12:27

ExpectMore · 30/09/2026 12:25

I don’t think it’s fair to destine those with low intelligence to low pay. I’m seen some particularly low IQ folk in senior roles. Similarly high IQ not needed in many roles eg recruitment

I’m not talking about people who are a bit dim. I’m talking about people who can barely function. There are a lot of them.

nearlylovemyusername · 30/09/2026 12:29

BIossomtoes · 30/09/2026 12:27

I’m not talking about people who are a bit dim. I’m talking about people who can barely function. There are a lot of them.

They would classify for learning disability.

The rest can and should do physical work which doesn't require high IQ. And yes, some are likely to be poor. Poor in UK relative terms.

strawberrybubblegum · 30/09/2026 12:29

Blinkett · 30/09/2026 11:33

Do you seriously think housing in the future will gain in value like it has in the last 30 years? I think real house prices will drop and keep dropping due to the falling population. House price falls are always a good thing if you ask me.

It doesn't really matter what the nominal price tag on the house is when you need to live in it.

As I showed in the table above, young people need to commit a very similar percentage of their income - for the same amount of time - to build up the asset. The return on that asset after 25-40 years is a paid-up house they can continue to live in.

The higher nominal price tag doesn't even help the generation who inherit the house! They still inherit eg 'half a paid off house', regardless of what the £number is.

So the 2026 person - having inherited half a house - only needs to dedicate 22% of their average earnings to buy an average house, rather than 44% for someone who doesn't inherit.

Not very different to a 1995 person - having inherited half a house - who needed to dedicate 19% of their average earnings to buy an average house, rather than 36% for someone who doesn't inherit.

cattussuperior · 30/09/2026 12:30

It’s damn stupid to think the state pension will ever be means tested because that would be a perverse incentive for people to stop paying (often hundred of £££ every month) into occupational or private pensions. Enjoy the money in their pockets in the here and now and get the full state pension.
Total opposite of what the govt wants and has encouraged people to do through auto enrolment

SerendipityJane · 30/09/2026 12:30

Differentforgirls · 30/09/2026 12:24

Well aren't you lovely.

Just trying to fit in

OneFastPinkTraybake · 30/09/2026 12:32

ExpectMore · 30/09/2026 12:24

Disabled are excluded as they should be covered by disability benefits. Perhaps caring should be treated similarly eg akin to NI credits

Not everyone who is disabled gets disability benefits

OneFastPinkTraybake · 30/09/2026 12:34

nearlylovemyusername · 30/09/2026 12:29

They would classify for learning disability.

The rest can and should do physical work which doesn't require high IQ. And yes, some are likely to be poor. Poor in UK relative terms.

What do you mean classify for learning disability. Not everyone can do physical work. Seriously. You clearly don't have a clue of the challenges some people face in their day to day lives.

OneFastPinkTraybake · 30/09/2026 12:35

strawberrybubblegum · 30/09/2026 12:29

It doesn't really matter what the nominal price tag on the house is when you need to live in it.

As I showed in the table above, young people need to commit a very similar percentage of their income - for the same amount of time - to build up the asset. The return on that asset after 25-40 years is a paid-up house they can continue to live in.

The higher nominal price tag doesn't even help the generation who inherit the house! They still inherit eg 'half a paid off house', regardless of what the £number is.

So the 2026 person - having inherited half a house - only needs to dedicate 22% of their average earnings to buy an average house, rather than 44% for someone who doesn't inherit.

Not very different to a 1995 person - having inherited half a house - who needed to dedicate 19% of their average earnings to buy an average house, rather than 36% for someone who doesn't inherit.

Some people don't inherit anything. Its not something that people should assume is going to happen to them

AllIwantForChrismasIsAKitchenAidStandMixer · 30/09/2026 12:37

Blondiebeachbabe · 30/09/2026 12:12

They had everything handed to them and their lives are easy

Oh do behave!

Your parents have obviously worked very hard for what they have, and when they die, you will be "handed" everything they have. FFS

They have worked a bit hard but my mum worked very part time and while my dad did work hard I don’t think he worked harder necessarily than other people. They were lucky. They benefited from systems that were set up to make them money.

Differentforgirls · 30/09/2026 12:38

Blinkett · 30/09/2026 11:30

yes but those with a mortgage have to heat and maintain their properties AND pay a mortgage, hence housing costs are lower, as I said. And heating a property isn’t generally considered a ‘housing cost’.

And if you're retired and own your own home, you paid a mortgage when your children were young. We weren't born retired.

Shadymeadow · 30/09/2026 12:41

SerendipityJane · 30/09/2026 12:15

A lot of pensioners will receive more than they paid in.

Scroungers.

That depends on how long you live.

I know of several men who snuffed it before retirement age and therefore got nothing and neither did their wives.

SerendipityJane · 30/09/2026 12:43

OneFastPinkTraybake · 30/09/2026 12:32

Not everyone who is disabled gets disability benefits

You ,may quibble about the exact number, but £16 billion in unclaimed benefits should really be a national scandal.

To be glad triple lock going and hope they means test it too
Shadymeadow · 30/09/2026 12:50

OneFastPinkTraybake · 30/09/2026 11:27

And experience working with the public depending on what part of the UK you are applying in

You get training for that.

A female I know trained as a Prison Officer which requires no formal qualifications but needed -
Online Tests: Scenario-based judgments and basic number and reading skill tests.
Assessment Centre: An interview, a written test, and role-play exercises to check your personal values.
Health and Fitness: Medical screening, eyesight and hearing checks, and a physical fitness test.
Training Provided
Foundation Training: Once hired, you complete comprehensive training (such as the Prison Officer Entry Level Training) covering safety, de-escalation, and restraint.
Qualifications Gained on the Job: You earn professional credentials during your employment, including a Level 3 diploma.

OneFastPinkTraybake · 30/09/2026 12:51

SerendipityJane · 30/09/2026 12:43

You ,may quibble about the exact number, but £16 billion in unclaimed benefits should really be a national scandal.

I'm not quibbling. I'm trying to state that getting disability benefits isn't an easy process for a lot of people

Differentforgirls · 30/09/2026 12:52

Shadymeadow · 30/09/2026 12:41

That depends on how long you live.

I know of several men who snuffed it before retirement age and therefore got nothing and neither did their wives.

I've posted this on here before. My colleague, 40 years Local Govt service, single, retired at 60. He died age 61 and his year of retirement started in the January before lockdown. He spent most of it alone. Never got a state pension.

The young people on here can't seem to enjoy their lives for being jealous of people older people than them who have went through the exact same things!

What a way to live.

3wouldbegood · 30/09/2026 12:53

BIossomtoes · 30/09/2026 12:10

I think that’s debatable regardless of how DWP categorise it. Benefits aren’t generally taxable, the state pension is, it basically removes the personal allowance.

No, not really. It is categorised as a benefit in the National Insurance Act 1946 and in the Beveridge Report. The fact that it's a benefit is legally significant as it means that Parliament can change the rules (age, conditions, amount etc), whereas if it were a proprietary right they would not be able to do this.

I'm not sure why people argue about this. Categorising it as a benefit is a fact about how the state pension works- it's not a slur on people who receive it.

MrsJeanLuc · 30/09/2026 12:55

Differentforgirls · 30/09/2026 09:57

I'm technically Baby Boomer and not due my pension for 5 years.

Yes, well, there are always boundary cases 😁.
Doesn't invalidate my point though

Pepperlee · 30/09/2026 12:56

Blondiebeachbabe · 30/09/2026 12:12

They had everything handed to them and their lives are easy

Oh do behave!

Your parents have obviously worked very hard for what they have, and when they die, you will be "handed" everything they have. FFS

Sickening isn't it? Maybe their principles will stop them from accepting a huge inheritance. All this moaning because your relatives are extremely well off is incomprehensible to me. My inheritance when both parents died in the same year was a 9 year old sister.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.