Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform want to cut PIP

1000 replies

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 09:15

Reform want to cut benefits for disabled people. They want businesses to pay more towards sickness etc. I find it repulsive that they want to do this. When will people understand that they are a bunch of self interested sharks who want to make a stack of dosh for themselves while in govt and that they font give a damn about anyone in need. Why cant the most vulnerable ppl who vote for them see thus. It's astonishing. It's ac joke. I eish ppl who get what Reform.iscreally about and how it manipulates would make sn extra effort to tslk to.ppl who dont seem to get it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
PensionPTake · 16/08/2026 17:54

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 17:16

Not a lie - I know people who work for the DWP and they confirm this. You may have to enclose a doctors or counsellors note but they are easy to obtain.

No ones getting pip from a doctors or counsellors note.

CrowForSale · 16/08/2026 17:55

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 17:16

Not a lie - I know people who work for the DWP and they confirm this. You may have to enclose a doctors or counsellors note but they are easy to obtain.

Mate, it’s still not true.

KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 17:55

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 17:46

Are you comparing the Restore leader, "Rupert" as some call him now, a bit like clowns in the pub in the 90"s talking about "Liam and Noel" as if they were mates, are you comparing him to some of these global "horrific people", not sure that stands up to scrutiny TBH?

He's no Hitler isn't really much of a compliment.

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 17:57

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 17:38

Restore have the fastest growing membership in living memory, the polls I was reacting to were saying Farage will not be PM, so not really sure what your point is? You say he doesn"t want to be PM, what are his 35 years in politics about then, just a hobby?

A grift rather than a hobby I'd say. He's got to the point where he claims he'd need a million pounds a year to be an MP so he's obviously benefited financially from it. He's not awfully keen to do a deal with Mr Lowe, I suppose he might if the price was right, but nothing to suggest that presently.

The thing is, I understand that the PM has to turn up for work more than three times in two years. It's frowned upon for them to have public temper tantrums or break parliamentary codes or tell overt, provable lies. Mr Farage would have to make some tough choices if he was serious about the top job.

Let's have some facts to back up your Restore claim. Fastest growing where? Are these officially verified or just Restore's own figures? How does rise in membership correlate to electoral success (see Corbyn)?

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 17:58

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 17:16

Not a lie - I know people who work for the DWP and they confirm this. You may have to enclose a doctors or counsellors note but they are easy to obtain.

It is a lie. How does a GP note saying you are taking anti depressants earn you enough points for any of the sections in the 14 page form?

EasternStandard · 16/08/2026 17:59

itsgettingweird · 16/08/2026 17:52

I agree.

But it’s the reform voters all predicting reform will be in power.

Based on opinion rather than historical voting figures which would indicate that despite their rise in popularity it isn’t anywhere close to indicating that will happen.

@TemperanceWestsaid it best above.

I don’t think historical figures can be relied upon, but I couldn’t call who will win atm.

Hopefully there won’t be a GE for a while and we can just be left alone on that issue.

Times radio just brought having a GE up again, it’s not necessary and I just thought ah let us be for a bit. See how it goes.

ETA on figures Reform have fluctuated from majority polls to not, so it depends how that pans out.

Jaimelefromage · 16/08/2026 17:59

pimplebum · 16/08/2026 10:10

And stop funing to SEN kids

Is there a reason you begrudge my non verbal, doubly incontinent autistic 7 year old son, who cannot be left alone for even one second as he’s a danger to himself and will never live an independent life, his DLA? I mean, I had to quit my £90k a year job to care for him (I now work school hours, term time only, minimum wage as there is no available wrap around or holiday childcare for him) so it’s a struggle to provide him with everything he needs due to his disability.

itsgettingweird · 16/08/2026 18:02

EasternStandard · 16/08/2026 17:59

I don’t think historical figures can be relied upon, but I couldn’t call who will win atm.

Hopefully there won’t be a GE for a while and we can just be left alone on that issue.

Times radio just brought having a GE up again, it’s not necessary and I just thought ah let us be for a bit. See how it goes.

ETA on figures Reform have fluctuated from majority polls to not, so it depends how that pans out.

Edited

I agree.

I think we need some stability for a few years and a chance for change to be implemented and felt.

CrowForSale · 16/08/2026 18:03

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 17:21

In actual fact, in some areas you can apply for PIP online. It’s being trialled in various areas, but is by no means the norm. Whatever evidence you have can be uploaded or sent separately and generally GP evidence mostly consists of the record of consultations - they don’t provide specific reports.

Quite, it’s an experiment that is yet to be properly evaluated by results and outcomes.

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 18:05

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 17:50

Make what more clear ? PIP wasn’t a benefit in the 1980’s. It was introduced in 2013. The criteria for benefit along with the demographics in the UK and diagnostic/medical advances have changed a lot in that time so even if such figures existed they wouldn’t prove anything that’s being discussed here.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/welfare-numbers-facts-behind-britain-175034417.html

Welfare in numbers: The facts behind Britain’s soaring benefits bill

As Labour attempts to tighten Britain’s burgeoning welfare belt, Alicja Hagopian and David Maddox investigate the true cost of the welfare state

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/welfare-numbers-facts-behind-britain-175034417.html

ladylioness · 16/08/2026 18:05

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 09:15

Reform want to cut benefits for disabled people. They want businesses to pay more towards sickness etc. I find it repulsive that they want to do this. When will people understand that they are a bunch of self interested sharks who want to make a stack of dosh for themselves while in govt and that they font give a damn about anyone in need. Why cant the most vulnerable ppl who vote for them see thus. It's astonishing. It's ac joke. I eish ppl who get what Reform.iscreally about and how it manipulates would make sn extra effort to tslk to.ppl who dont seem to get it.

Labour are also looking at PIP a review is due in November, it’s the TIMMS review. They already have stated that too many people receive this for what they stated were “mild” issues.

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 18:06

itsgettingweird · 16/08/2026 18:02

I agree.

I think we need some stability for a few years and a chance for change to be implemented and felt.

That is what KS used to say?

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 18:06

ladylioness · 16/08/2026 18:05

Labour are also looking at PIP a review is due in November, it’s the TIMMS review. They already have stated that too many people receive this for what they stated were “mild” issues.

Yes, like the Tories they just parrot Reform now, because they have to.

Vanillaicelatte · 16/08/2026 18:07

Onbdy · 16/08/2026 17:18

@Freud2 Utter bollocks!
You cannot claim PIP or DLA online so either you’re lying or your friends are. 🙄

Depends on where you live
there are a few test areas that allow you to claim pip online
but initially you have to call up

itsgettingweird · 16/08/2026 18:07

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 18:06

That is what KS used to say?

And?

KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 18:11

Robert Jenrick is the guy who took a £12k personal donation from a billionaire after he'd rushed through his planning application. Jenrick overruled the llocal council and planning inspectors and saved the billionaire loads of hassle and money.

Now he wants employers to pay a 'return to work cover' insurance to fund the sickness payments for employees.

Who will decide the companies who provide that insurance?
How can we be sure the people chosing the companies and regulating them are impartial?

inthequietofdawn · 16/08/2026 18:11

Even in the trial areas where the application can be made online, it isn’t available to appointee’s completing the form on behalf of someone else.

KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 18:13

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 18:06

Yes, like the Tories they just parrot Reform now, because they have to.

Yet so many people on here have said the main parties aren't listening.
Which is it?

BlueRedCat · 16/08/2026 18:18

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 13:06

Well that would be quite a job! Social security and the welfare state go back centuries. So much of what we have today is inextricably linked with circumstances and political trends of the past. Starting from scratch would be unworkable.

I'm not sure what you mean by your last sentence, could you elaborate?

You can only force the general working population to work themselves to the bone to pay the taxes to provide for everyone else before those people start to break themselves. The more the tax the government take of them the harder/longer they have to work to maintain the same standard of living. They will get exhausted and drop out the workforce.

my question about starting from benefits from scratch was hypothetical. No need to look at what came before. Just what would we do if we could start again. I’m genuinely curious- how would it be structured? We definitely could say as of tomorrow anyone on the old system gets what they have but anyone who hadn’t claimed yet goes onto a new system.

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 18:19

It is reported in the Express newspaper that Reform UK wants to do a major review of PIP and health benefits if they are elected. There are currently 6.9 million receiving disability benefits and it is reported that 2.16 million claimants will keep there PIP in full and a further 2.89 million claimants will have there benefit claim modified or reduced but still get some benefits. Some of the savings will go to councils to administer help to disabled people in the form of home modifications eg walk in shower instead of bath. Councils already have some funding but it's very limited ATM. As usual Mumsnet immediately sees a headline and declares all PIP will be abolished.

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 18:21

BlueRedCat · 16/08/2026 18:18

You can only force the general working population to work themselves to the bone to pay the taxes to provide for everyone else before those people start to break themselves. The more the tax the government take of them the harder/longer they have to work to maintain the same standard of living. They will get exhausted and drop out the workforce.

my question about starting from benefits from scratch was hypothetical. No need to look at what came before. Just what would we do if we could start again. I’m genuinely curious- how would it be structured? We definitely could say as of tomorrow anyone on the old system gets what they have but anyone who hadn’t claimed yet goes onto a new system.

That's your opinion, ok. Where's your evidence? Otherwise it's just hot air.

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 18:23

ladylioness · 16/08/2026 18:05

Labour are also looking at PIP a review is due in November, it’s the TIMMS review. They already have stated that too many people receive this for what they stated were “mild” issues.

Labour are looking to stop UC claimants under 22 claiming lower capacity to work. It's a blanket policy but what about those with very severe learning disabilities who are unlikely to ever be able to work. I.Q lower than 60. What will happen to those people?

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 18:24

What do you think this proves? Tell us the reasoning behind it.

Dontcallmescarface · 16/08/2026 18:25

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 17:33

Wow, it's like bingo.

Yep the only thing missing was the "5 holidays a year" that poster missed a trick there, it was almost a perfect score.

HPFA · 16/08/2026 18:25

BlueRedCat · 16/08/2026 18:18

You can only force the general working population to work themselves to the bone to pay the taxes to provide for everyone else before those people start to break themselves. The more the tax the government take of them the harder/longer they have to work to maintain the same standard of living. They will get exhausted and drop out the workforce.

my question about starting from benefits from scratch was hypothetical. No need to look at what came before. Just what would we do if we could start again. I’m genuinely curious- how would it be structured? We definitely could say as of tomorrow anyone on the old system gets what they have but anyone who hadn’t claimed yet goes onto a new system.

All these taxpayers will expect benefits and help for themselves and their families when they need it.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread