Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform want to cut PIP

1000 replies

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 09:15

Reform want to cut benefits for disabled people. They want businesses to pay more towards sickness etc. I find it repulsive that they want to do this. When will people understand that they are a bunch of self interested sharks who want to make a stack of dosh for themselves while in govt and that they font give a damn about anyone in need. Why cant the most vulnerable ppl who vote for them see thus. It's astonishing. It's ac joke. I eish ppl who get what Reform.iscreally about and how it manipulates would make sn extra effort to tslk to.ppl who dont seem to get it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 15:47

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 15:44

Bumbling through isn’t setting the bar very high for the most vulnerable in society is it ?

Why didn"t they give care workers a £20 per hour minimum wage instead of bailing out the housing bubble in that case? You don"t actually believe that importing economic migrants to do care work on the cheap is "setting the bar high" do you?

Dontcallmescarface · 16/08/2026 15:48

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 15:40

It will be funded in the same way, a person who needs mental health support (really needs it) will get it, weed smoking chancers who play video games and talk shite all day will be cut loose, they can do field work it will be very very good for them in the long run.

We're not just talking mental health support but support for all those deemed as not being disabled enough. So I ask again where will the help come from?

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 15:48

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 15:40

It will be funded in the same way, a person who needs mental health support (really needs it) will get it, weed smoking chancers who play video games and talk shite all day will be cut loose, they can do field work it will be very very good for them in the long run.

How? Those who really need mental health support aren’t getting anything. Children and adults are left until they’re attempting suicide and even then they’re just patched up and sent off with nothing and left to get worse. Really serious conditions are not getting the treatment needed which means the treatable is left to get untreatable with people who could have been saved ending up in inpatient wards costing the tax payer thousands.

So where is it coming from?

Samysungy · 16/08/2026 15:48

So Reform saying "Lets help our own" and then saying "lets fuck our own over"....

Didn't see that one coming eh?

Morethanadecade · 16/08/2026 15:49

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 15:20

If you are able to work and get a wage why do you need PIP? I understand if you are physically disabled but not if you're anxious or depressed

You can’t get pip for anxiety and depression. The bar for mental health disabilities is very high.

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 15:49

x2boys · 16/08/2026 15:45

I agree but i thnk the reasons people think that people get pip for smxiety and depression easily is becuase as soon as PIP for mental health is mentioned its often assumed its anxiety and depression aa severe and enduring mental illness is rarely talked about
Also most of us have had mild anxiety and depression so some posters assume its always mild and easily treated with exercise and getting out and about

Yep. Wouldn’t disagree with this. I’ve taken part in many a thread on the subject, as I think have you, and there are so many assumptions made about mental health and posters always seem to know someone who’s made a successful claim despite just taking a few pills from their GP. Which those of us who have actually engaged in the PIP process know is nonsense.

TheOliveWriter · 16/08/2026 15:50

Coconutter24 · 16/08/2026 09:22

You haven’t put any information about what they would replace it with, so you’ve given half a story. They would instead have a Health security allowance but only the ‘severe, enduring and high-risk cases’ would receive cash support. So those that absolutely need it will get financial support. Which is how it should be.

There is no detail because Reform has indicated they will provide further information on how this will work on Monday. Attention grabbing headline from Robert Jenrick.

Ireallycantthinkofagoodone · 16/08/2026 15:50

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 09:59

It’s such a stupid ill thought out plan. They want businesses to take responsibility for sick pay so businesses will simply not employ people who have any history of MH or physical illness. So menopausal women, women of childbearing age, the disabled, the ND etc are all going to find it very hard to get jobs. The very people who need support into work. Not only that companies will surely demand to see medical records before employment and try to wriggle out of sick pay when it’s needed. Are we all going to hand them over?

Then there is the CBT they want to be given for all MH problems and physiotheraphy for physical disabilities instead of PIP😂😂😂. CBT often doesn’t work for those with ND and is useless for many conditions like trauma, EDs etc. You also can’t physio your way out of disability.

It’s so stupid you couldn’t make it up. One might think they want this announcement to deflect from something.🤔 Somebody needs to tell them the investigation into Farage isn’t going to go away. 😂

Surely it’s more sensible to provide physio for someone with back pain, for example, than have them sitting at home on benefits?

And ‘menopausal women’?? Has that suddenly become some sort of disability? It’s just a normal part of female aging. Why on earth would they need PIP?

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 15:51

Samysungy · 16/08/2026 15:48

So Reform saying "Lets help our own" and then saying "lets fuck our own over"....

Didn't see that one coming eh?

I haven’t worked out what the purpose of the announcement is yet. I would have thought it’s a vote loser among disabled people and their families, not to mention HCP’s and carers.

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 15:51

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 15:25

I think that’s quite likely. Motability makes a significant contribution to the UK car industry, both in new car sales and in the used car market. To be honest, I broadly supported removing luxury models - I can understand the criticisms. The goal is to keep disabled people mobile, not to enhance their experience above that of non disabled people.

I support restricting high end specs for most, too - they’ve mainly done this by pricing, but those who can demonstrate they need them for disability related reasons, such as wheelchair access, auto transmission, or easier access will be exempt. I think the removal of tax breaks and other concessions is a bit of a step too far and I wonder if it was designed to appease the critics more than anything else. Even those who are exempted from VAT on disability related products will be expected to pay VAT on the vehicle/insurance where necessary and this has already led to higher advance payments, higher insurance premiums and excesses and an increase in the provision of aids and adaptations enabling many disabled people to drive.

As you say, for many, it will no longer be viable and it kind of undermines what the scheme was intended for - to improve independence for disabled people by providing easier and cheaper access to a vehicle and carefree motoring.

Edited

I disagree about taking away so called luxury cars. Apart from anything, those that were removed were what people would typically view as "luxury" - a symbolic gesture. I believe you can still get a Polestar! Their removal was about how we construct disability within narrow parameters and how people are meant to perform disability. This involves being humble and grateful for whatever is bestowed upon you, living within society's ideals of disability - using your car for shopping and medical appointments rather than social and leisure, and always knowing that you are not quite on par with the average non-disabled citizen. People pay for their motability leases including, quite often, large upfront payments so there is no reason not to allow them free choice on the basis that they're disabled.

HPFA · 16/08/2026 15:51

Ireallycantthinkofagoodone · 16/08/2026 15:50

Surely it’s more sensible to provide physio for someone with back pain, for example, than have them sitting at home on benefits?

And ‘menopausal women’?? Has that suddenly become some sort of disability? It’s just a normal part of female aging. Why on earth would they need PIP?

Abd when the physio doesn't work?

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 15:53

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 15:48

How? Those who really need mental health support aren’t getting anything. Children and adults are left until they’re attempting suicide and even then they’re just patched up and sent off with nothing and left to get worse. Really serious conditions are not getting the treatment needed which means the treatable is left to get untreatable with people who could have been saved ending up in inpatient wards costing the tax payer thousands.

So where is it coming from?

Edited

From cuts to overseas aid and support for economic migrants and asylum seekers as a starting point, then it is coming from educating people that feeling mildly anxious doesn"t mean you can"t participate in the world of work, and also getting kids off social media/phones and educating them about the dangers of weed and other drugs for mental health, also less people in the country means less strain on NHS and other support services,and remember that the fuck up you describe is happening under a Labour government off the back of 14 years of Tory nonsense, nothing at all to do with Reform.

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 15:53

Ireallycantthinkofagoodone · 16/08/2026 15:50

Surely it’s more sensible to provide physio for someone with back pain, for example, than have them sitting at home on benefits?

And ‘menopausal women’?? Has that suddenly become some sort of disability? It’s just a normal part of female aging. Why on earth would they need PIP?

They don’t however if companies are going to be taking on sickness payment for the first two years they will look at demographics that could cause them to have to pay out and avoid employing them. It’s such a stupid idea.

Notasbigasithink · 16/08/2026 15:54

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 14:10

And once again, benefit claimants and working people aren't two distinct groups.

Actually just put that on my gravestone, I've said it that many times.

Its not about defining groups, its about affordability to the country and guess what?! We can't afford to keep paying out!!!!

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 15:55

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 15:53

From cuts to overseas aid and support for economic migrants and asylum seekers as a starting point, then it is coming from educating people that feeling mildly anxious doesn"t mean you can"t participate in the world of work, and also getting kids off social media/phones and educating them about the dangers of weed and other drugs for mental health, also less people in the country means less strain on NHS and other support services,and remember that the fuck up you describe is happening under a Labour government off the back of 14 years of Tory nonsense, nothing at all to do with Reform.

😂You're talking nonsense.

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 15:55

Notasbigasithink · 16/08/2026 15:54

Its not about defining groups, its about affordability to the country and guess what?! We can't afford to keep paying out!!!!

Do you want disabled people
in work paying taxes or not?

Notasbigasithink · 16/08/2026 15:55

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 14:19

So? Do additional costs of disability disappear when your bank statement reaches a certain number?

No but having having a very large sum of money available makes those additional costs a hell of a lot easier to manage than someone who doesn't! Very simple really isnt it?!

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 15:56

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 15:51

I haven’t worked out what the purpose of the announcement is yet. I would have thought it’s a vote loser among disabled people and their families, not to mention HCP’s and carers.

That assumes that they are all thick and don"t understand that the country is bankrupt? Reform know that the people who vote for them are way smarter than the diddies who keep voting for the virtue signaling parties that think they have a free money tree in the back garden.

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 15:56

TheOliveWriter · 16/08/2026 15:50

There is no detail because Reform has indicated they will provide further information on how this will work on Monday. Attention grabbing headline from Robert Jenrick.

They'll provide it on Monday the 12th of never because, like all their policies, it's red meat, attention grabbing unworkable crap.

Tedsnan1 · 16/08/2026 15:57

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 15:10

Absolutely. PIP isn't mean tested so you could be on £200,000 plus a year and still get it. It's mainly an on-line form so much easier to lie than in person. You should not get PIP for mild anxiety and depression - only for severe mental health conditions. This government is totally naive to think a small number of people are abusing the system. Everyone I know knows at least one person scamming the system. I work in mental health so see it first hand.

This makes my blood boil. You do NOT get PIP simply by completing an online form. Shame on you for telling such a whopping, dangerous lie.

Notasbigasithink · 16/08/2026 15:58

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 15:55

Do you want disabled people
in work paying taxes or not?

You're missing the point 🙄🙄

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 15:58

Ireallycantthinkofagoodone · 16/08/2026 15:50

Surely it’s more sensible to provide physio for someone with back pain, for example, than have them sitting at home on benefits?

And ‘menopausal women’?? Has that suddenly become some sort of disability? It’s just a normal part of female aging. Why on earth would they need PIP?

The vast majority of those claimants I supported with a ‘bad back’ had a substantial health condition as the underlying cause, and absolutely met the criteria for PIP. And menopause is not a disability. You can’t claim PIP for it unless, again, it meets the eligibility criteria. For some women menopause brings on significant symptoms which are long term and debilitating, so if they meet the bar for PIP it’s not unreasonable to claim.

I think there’s a misconception about PIP here. It isn’t awarded because you are disabled. The disability itself doesn’t matter - it’s the impact of that disability on day to day life that counts, as a way of assessing the likely extra costs.

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 15:59

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 15:53

From cuts to overseas aid and support for economic migrants and asylum seekers as a starting point, then it is coming from educating people that feeling mildly anxious doesn"t mean you can"t participate in the world of work, and also getting kids off social media/phones and educating them about the dangers of weed and other drugs for mental health, also less people in the country means less strain on NHS and other support services,and remember that the fuck up you describe is happening under a Labour government off the back of 14 years of Tory nonsense, nothing at all to do with Reform.

Do you bother to read this post?

Rosscameasdoody · Today 15:38
I think there’s a lot of misunderstanding and even ‘well I know someone who……..’ around the question of mental health conditions and PIP. I was a disability outreach worker for over twenty years and heavily involved with PIP at all stages. The bar for a stand alone mental health claim for PIP is set very high. Generally, if you have anxiety or depression treated solely by a GP - standard anti depressants, talking therapy, CBT referrals etc, you won’t get PIP because simple anxiety and depression treated by primary care doesn’t meet that bar.
The vast majority of the stand alone MH PIP claimants I dealt with had very severe ND or MH conditions such as various psychoses, schizophrenia, BPD, bipolar disorder etc. There were also those with severe OCD, learning disability, or difficult eating disorders. They required specialist input from consultant led secondary care mental health teams, many had been hospitalised and were heavily medicated and monitored and a good proportion had ended up in the justice system before they could get the help they needed - such is the state of MH services in the UK.
The current criteria for MH PIP claims is available online and demonstrates the high degree of disability and evidence claimants need. The only claimants I was involved with who were awarded on simple GP treated anxiety and depression, also had physical disability.

Tedsnan1 · 16/08/2026 15:59

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 15:16

They will still get help.

Really? Under Reform?

Gooseling · 16/08/2026 16:00

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 15:20

If you are able to work and get a wage why do you need PIP? I understand if you are physically disabled but not if you're anxious or depressed

If a persons symptoms from their anxiety disorder or depression affect their daily life and stops them from doing tasks independently and safely then yes they are entitled to PIP.

PIP is not awarded on a diagnosis of “anxiety” or “depression”. It is awarded by how much your symptoms affect your daily life.

People seem to think you can apply for PIP and say “I’m anxious/depressed” and you get PIP. That is not the case at all.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread