Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform want to cut PIP

1000 replies

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 09:15

Reform want to cut benefits for disabled people. They want businesses to pay more towards sickness etc. I find it repulsive that they want to do this. When will people understand that they are a bunch of self interested sharks who want to make a stack of dosh for themselves while in govt and that they font give a damn about anyone in need. Why cant the most vulnerable ppl who vote for them see thus. It's astonishing. It's ac joke. I eish ppl who get what Reform.iscreally about and how it manipulates would make sn extra effort to tslk to.ppl who dont seem to get it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Pickledonion1999 · 16/08/2026 14:46

DiscoRice · 16/08/2026 14:38

Reform have said they would scrap PIP. That is going to affect everyone on it, "genuine" or otherwise.

they can't just scrap it without replacing it with an alternative. many use PIP to pay towards care. I guess if they sort social care out and make the care free, then that could allow them to reduce payments for some.
As someone upthread said it's odd how PIP is meant to be for the extra costs of a disability yet many can have zero extra cost and still claim significant amounts.

CrowForSale · 16/08/2026 14:47

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 14:31

I'm not sure what about my comments infers that I'm a criminal. Would you like to expand?

I have to say that I'm pleased MNHQ are on the ball today on this thread with deletions. That comment to you was really pathetic and nasty and deserved to be deleted. Meanwhile, Nigel's £5m problem isn't going away ...

JenniferBooth · 16/08/2026 14:48

"you have a car so you can access the community"

This is what a disabled pensioner friend of mine was told when he was visited by Adult Social Care He was asking about the possibility of storage for a mobility scooter and to have his shower turned into a walk in one. "we havent got the money" he was told
He did point out that Dunelm Tesco etc might take a dim view of him driving his car through their windows and down the aisles.

Essex County Council now run by Reform "we need to look after our own"

Olive123456 · 16/08/2026 14:49

KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 10:13

"the dwindling bunch of taxpayers who fund them all"

The total number of income tax payers in the UK has increased significantly over the last 10 years, rising from roughly 31 million mid-decade to approximately 36.7 million by the 2023/24 tax year

Because the tax threshold hasn't increased for years but minimum wage increases mean more people end up paying tax.

inthequietofdawn · 16/08/2026 14:49

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 14:43

Clearly the DC needs PIP but not an example for a person JUST claiming for anxiety if they need support with money, cooking and bathing.

Wrong. As I said, the only diagnosis they have is anxiety. They have difficulties with money, cooking and bathing because of their anxiety. Cooking - they are anxious about things such as using the hob, using a knife, touching food, knowing when food is off, knowing when food is cooked… Money - they are anxious about spending money, about knowing how much to spend and what needs to be earmarked for other things, about being scammed, about getting the right change, about using a card or ATM… Bathing - they need prompting their anxiety means they need prompting to move along with the task rather than get stuck.

Onbdy · 16/08/2026 14:50

placemats · 16/08/2026 10:58

And PIP carries on above pension age if given indefinitely. Above pension age a person cannot make a new application for PIP. That defers to Attendance Allowance.

@placemats
Not strictly true. PIP continues after state pension age if a claimant has claimed before state pension age. If it isn't an indefinite award then they will have to complete a review just as those under SPA do. Attendance Allowance is only for people over SPA who haven’t previously claimed a health related benefit, or those who haven’t for a period of time.

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 14:53

Jellycatspyjamas · 16/08/2026 14:42

Absolutely. People have no idea how poor social care provision is - they might think about it in terms of care needed when they’re older but many, many people need social care to live day by day. The costs of formal care are astronomical, informal carers save the economy £184 billion, the current cost of disability benefits is around £40 billion. It makes no sense to cut disability benefits paid to informal carers to add £184 billion to the social care spend.

But yes, let’s keep moaning about someone getting a motability car…

I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. Most people think of social care as elderly care, but unless they’ve engaged with it themselves or on behalf of a disabled friend or relative they generally don’t think about the disability support it covers. Or about how much the combination of PIP and carers allowance saves the tax payer - in my experience of MN most of the discussion around CA revolves around tightening up of eligibility and regular (and expensive) checks to ensure carers are doing their full hours - 35 hours a week for the princely sum of £86 a week. That’s less than £3 a week folks, but let’s make sure the tax payer gets their money’s worth from people who are very often horribly overworked and under supported.

And these threads always end up slagging off Motability. Strangely, it always seems to be those who demonstrably know the least about the scheme who have the most to say !!

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 14:53

Pickledonion1999 · 16/08/2026 14:46

they can't just scrap it without replacing it with an alternative. many use PIP to pay towards care. I guess if they sort social care out and make the care free, then that could allow them to reduce payments for some.
As someone upthread said it's odd how PIP is meant to be for the extra costs of a disability yet many can have zero extra cost and still claim significant amounts.

We know that a government can't scrap disability support benefits without giving an alternative. Reform would like us to think that such a thing is eminently possible and they achieve that by telling their voters that there are a lot of fraudulent claimants, that disabled people are almost always capable of and always better off in work because that is how you demonstrate your authenticity as a disabled person - by striving to overcome your disability. I have little patience for those who are willing too believe all that.

As for the last part of your post, well, it's not really for you to say is it?

ToWhitToWhoo · 16/08/2026 14:54

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 12:54

Clearly you have never read "On being Sane in Insane Places" Rosenhan (1973). Psychiatrists have nothing to go on but their instinct. There is no objective test for depression or anxiety. Just a few questionnaires people fill in.

This study was done over 50 years ago, and a LOT has changed since then Much more is known aabout psychiatric illnesses now. For example, the physiological aspects of schizophrenia were only just beginning to be discovered at that time. Moreover, the study was about people being placed in mental hospitals, and the criteria for such placements have changed TOTALLY since then. Then, it was rather too easy to assign people to mental hospitals, and too often some social nonconformity was sufficient. Nowadays, there are often insufficient places even for acutely ill people who may pose a danger to themselves and/or to others.

And people are not diagnosed with depression or anxiety disorders just on the basis of filling in questionnaires, though such questionnaires may play a part. But they need a comprehensive medical examination to be diagnosed. Diagnostic manuals include a list of criteria that must be met. Yes, some people could fake them, but people can also put a thermometer in hot water to fake a fever.

Jellycatspyjamas · 16/08/2026 14:54

Pickledonion1999 · 16/08/2026 14:46

they can't just scrap it without replacing it with an alternative. many use PIP to pay towards care. I guess if they sort social care out and make the care free, then that could allow them to reduce payments for some.
As someone upthread said it's odd how PIP is meant to be for the extra costs of a disability yet many can have zero extra cost and still claim significant amounts.

Free care isn’t free though, in fact it’s considerably more expensive to pay carers than it is to support family members through the benefits system. Swapping a benefits bill of £40 billion for a social care bill of £184 billion is absolute lunacy.

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 14:58

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 14:53

I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. Most people think of social care as elderly care, but unless they’ve engaged with it themselves or on behalf of a disabled friend or relative they generally don’t think about the disability support it covers. Or about how much the combination of PIP and carers allowance saves the tax payer - in my experience of MN most of the discussion around CA revolves around tightening up of eligibility and regular (and expensive) checks to ensure carers are doing their full hours - 35 hours a week for the princely sum of £86 a week. That’s less than £3 a week folks, but let’s make sure the tax payer gets their money’s worth from people who are very often horribly overworked and under supported.

And these threads always end up slagging off Motability. Strangely, it always seems to be those who demonstrably know the least about the scheme who have the most to say !!

I wonder if we're likely to see a problem arising in the new and used car markets in the next few years? Myths and false beliefs around motability have led to such stringent restrictions within the scheme that it's no longer viable for many, which will have a knock on effect on both demand for brand new cars and the supply of decent three year old used cars.

CrowForSale · 16/08/2026 14:59

Onbdy · 16/08/2026 14:50

@placemats
Not strictly true. PIP continues after state pension age if a claimant has claimed before state pension age. If it isn't an indefinite award then they will have to complete a review just as those under SPA do. Attendance Allowance is only for people over SPA who haven’t previously claimed a health related benefit, or those who haven’t for a period of time.

I'm not splitting hairs here, honest, @Onbdy, just trying to fully understand the rules. By 'indefinite award' do you mean 'ongoing award', which I've seen in a recent PIP letter?

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 15:00

Onbdy · 16/08/2026 14:50

@placemats
Not strictly true. PIP continues after state pension age if a claimant has claimed before state pension age. If it isn't an indefinite award then they will have to complete a review just as those under SPA do. Attendance Allowance is only for people over SPA who haven’t previously claimed a health related benefit, or those who haven’t for a period of time.

Spot on. And in addition, those PIP claimants who continue to claim after SPA can’t be awarded an element of the benefit for the first time after reaching SPA. So for example, if you weren’t getting mobility component before reaching SPA you can’t be awarded it after that point.

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 15:01

CrowForSale · 16/08/2026 14:59

I'm not splitting hairs here, honest, @Onbdy, just trying to fully understand the rules. By 'indefinite award' do you mean 'ongoing award', which I've seen in a recent PIP letter?

Yes, indefinite, open ended and ongoing all mean the same thing. In practice it usually means ten years, after which there is a light touch review with minimal paperwork for the claimant. These awards are generally only made when it’s clear that the claimant’s condition is permanent and unlikely to change for the better, but there are still checks.

itsgettingweird · 16/08/2026 15:08

happybug1234 · 16/08/2026 11:21

If it genuinely is for the extra costs associated with being disabled why can’t we have an ‘expense reclaim’ type system, where you would pay for the help you need and reclaim the expense.

I don’t think 2 week all inclusives are what PIP is designed for

Because not all PIP is extensible and claimable in the effect.

Many of us are still supporting disabled children who have become adults.

We’ve taken a hit with our careers which has saved linemen H and S care. We continue to work less hours or poorly paid jobs due to that and saving the tax payer. We continue to save the tax payer through that work pattern.

Therefore one of the extra costs of PIP is income. So where you have someone who needs someone to support with cooking or support with bathing and therefore works 6 instead of 8 hours a day. How’s that claimable and extensible?

Unless the person doing that caring because it’s been agreed through a PIP assessment that need exists claims the care at NMW. The government pay their tax and NI and also a pension contribution towards a private pension?

I would would go for that. I’d have much more money coming in being able to claim for the hours to provide that care and also claim back the costs of equipment that can cost between £100-300 a time. Considering the rate of enhanced PIP is £778 every 4 weeks. In fact just the expenses for my time for agreed need would be £22k a year before tax (£1886 a month)

Dontcallmescarface · 16/08/2026 15:09

Olive123456 · 16/08/2026 14:35

Great. From what i've read, the genuine claimants will be fine, the fakers have something to worry about.

Bless your sweet innocent heart.

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 15:10

Coconutter24 · 16/08/2026 09:22

You haven’t put any information about what they would replace it with, so you’ve given half a story. They would instead have a Health security allowance but only the ‘severe, enduring and high-risk cases’ would receive cash support. So those that absolutely need it will get financial support. Which is how it should be.

Absolutely. PIP isn't mean tested so you could be on £200,000 plus a year and still get it. It's mainly an on-line form so much easier to lie than in person. You should not get PIP for mild anxiety and depression - only for severe mental health conditions. This government is totally naive to think a small number of people are abusing the system. Everyone I know knows at least one person scamming the system. I work in mental health so see it first hand.

plasticplate · 16/08/2026 15:12

Chenecinquantecinq · 16/08/2026 14:00

Well Motability cars should be restricted in use to ONLY those who care for the person however they aren't they often have open insurance policies at a HUGE COST to the tax payer!!!!!

Open policies are only available to those who need multiple rotating paid carers. Most people are restricted to named driver policies.

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 15:14

VividZebra · 16/08/2026 14:41

Reform are a bunch of cruel bastards. Luckily they will never get anywhere near power.

Don't be so sure!

CrowForSale · 16/08/2026 15:15

Rosscameasdoody · 16/08/2026 15:01

Yes, indefinite, open ended and ongoing all mean the same thing. In practice it usually means ten years, after which there is a light touch review with minimal paperwork for the claimant. These awards are generally only made when it’s clear that the claimant’s condition is permanent and unlikely to change for the better, but there are still checks.

Edited

Thank you.

So perhaps Reform plan to use the 'Ongoing' category to sift claimants, and decide who gets put in their new 'very disabled indeed, by jove' benefit category? And everyone else gets to take their chances with a near-bankrupt council? Triffic.

Meanwhile Reform have to set up a new assessment, review and appeal system that costs more than PIP? It'll keep the courts & tribunals even more overwhelmed on their toes, I suppose.

DestituteDesperate · 16/08/2026 15:15

This is disgustingly short sighted, what will happen to the vast majority of people that rely upon medical equipment, carers and other resources which the PIP helps cover?

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 15:15

Saw a guy getting on the bus not long ago, dropped his walking stick and bent down to get it quicker than I could, then trotted up the bus waving it and saying to me and anyone else within earshot, "Can"t lose my Pip Stick! "He seemed proud to be attached to the free money teat as if he had achieved something, the sooner loads of weed smoking chancers are ripped off this teat and made to work the better.

KeepPumping · 16/08/2026 15:16

DestituteDesperate · 16/08/2026 15:15

This is disgustingly short sighted, what will happen to the vast majority of people that rely upon medical equipment, carers and other resources which the PIP helps cover?

They will still get help.

CrowForSale · 16/08/2026 15:17

itsgettingweird · 16/08/2026 15:08

Because not all PIP is extensible and claimable in the effect.

Many of us are still supporting disabled children who have become adults.

We’ve taken a hit with our careers which has saved linemen H and S care. We continue to work less hours or poorly paid jobs due to that and saving the tax payer. We continue to save the tax payer through that work pattern.

Therefore one of the extra costs of PIP is income. So where you have someone who needs someone to support with cooking or support with bathing and therefore works 6 instead of 8 hours a day. How’s that claimable and extensible?

Unless the person doing that caring because it’s been agreed through a PIP assessment that need exists claims the care at NMW. The government pay their tax and NI and also a pension contribution towards a private pension?

I would would go for that. I’d have much more money coming in being able to claim for the hours to provide that care and also claim back the costs of equipment that can cost between £100-300 a time. Considering the rate of enhanced PIP is £778 every 4 weeks. In fact just the expenses for my time for agreed need would be £22k a year before tax (£1886 a month)

Absolutely spot on, @itsgettingweird

CrowForSale · 16/08/2026 15:17

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 15:10

Absolutely. PIP isn't mean tested so you could be on £200,000 plus a year and still get it. It's mainly an on-line form so much easier to lie than in person. You should not get PIP for mild anxiety and depression - only for severe mental health conditions. This government is totally naive to think a small number of people are abusing the system. Everyone I know knows at least one person scamming the system. I work in mental health so see it first hand.

Well that's wrong.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread