Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform want to cut PIP

1000 replies

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 09:15

Reform want to cut benefits for disabled people. They want businesses to pay more towards sickness etc. I find it repulsive that they want to do this. When will people understand that they are a bunch of self interested sharks who want to make a stack of dosh for themselves while in govt and that they font give a damn about anyone in need. Why cant the most vulnerable ppl who vote for them see thus. It's astonishing. It's ac joke. I eish ppl who get what Reform.iscreally about and how it manipulates would make sn extra effort to tslk to.ppl who dont seem to get it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Livelovebehappy · 16/08/2026 13:06

SodOffbacktoaibu · 16/08/2026 11:57

I'm not saying they should. It's the logic of your argument not mine.

I'd be amazed if any high earners claim PIP. Why would they bother?

You know that it's around 1.4% of PIP claims are fraudulent? And the majority of those are where claimants didn't report improvement in their condition which was partially error rather than intent. It's gone up from 0.4% last year.

Why PIP is being singled out I just don't know.

Why don't we look at the billions fraudulently claimed on contracts awarded to dodgy millionaires during the pandemic. £10.9 billion.

Look over here at these poor people....don't look over there at our dodgy mates...say the right wing. FFS.

1.4% found to be fraudulent. But many more go undetected. Thats my point. Pretty obvious. Not enough people employed to investigate.

Tiggy2000 · 16/08/2026 13:08

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 10:46

😂

Not sure what’s funny? I have a cousin like this, owns their own home so no rent or mortgage (inherited, not through hard work). Spends all day in bed and all night partying with their mates. I don’t know how much they get in benefits, but they do get Pip and seem to manage pretty well on it.

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 13:08

Gooseling · 16/08/2026 12:35

Oh my God.

This is so exhausting.

No. PIP shouldn’t be means tested, because it is intended on the extra costs and difficulties caused by disability/ill health.

Right firstly, disability and chronic ill health cost money regardless of a persons income. A disabled person earning 80K could still have substantial additional costs than a non disabled person on 80K doesn’t have.

If PIP stopped once you earned over a certain amount someone earning £10 more could potentially lose hundreds of pounds despite having exactly the same disability/condition and costs.

It could also discourage work. Someone might think “If I increase my hours or get promoted I’ll lose my PIP so what’s the point?” That’s incredibly problematic when PIP can help someone stay in work.

Two people with identical incomes could have completely different needs.

Means testing would add another layer of bureaucracy. PIP already assesses whether someones condition causes qualifying difficulties. Adding detailed financial assessments would make the system more complicated and more strain on the tax payer.

I repeat: if you have no idea about PIP or what it’s like to have a disability or chronic health condition then please shut up.

Well said. And as for the eugenics proposed by the pp, how shameful. To openly state that disabled people shouldn't be born really does betray something very nasty lurking in that person's psyche.

Binnyforthewin · 16/08/2026 13:08

Gooseling · 16/08/2026 12:35

Oh my God.

This is so exhausting.

No. PIP shouldn’t be means tested, because it is intended on the extra costs and difficulties caused by disability/ill health.

Right firstly, disability and chronic ill health cost money regardless of a persons income. A disabled person earning 80K could still have substantial additional costs than a non disabled person on 80K doesn’t have.

If PIP stopped once you earned over a certain amount someone earning £10 more could potentially lose hundreds of pounds despite having exactly the same disability/condition and costs.

It could also discourage work. Someone might think “If I increase my hours or get promoted I’ll lose my PIP so what’s the point?” That’s incredibly problematic when PIP can help someone stay in work.

Two people with identical incomes could have completely different needs.

Means testing would add another layer of bureaucracy. PIP already assesses whether someones condition causes qualifying difficulties. Adding detailed financial assessments would make the system more complicated and more strain on the tax payer.

I repeat: if you have no idea about PIP or what it’s like to have a disability or chronic health condition then please shut up.

Please don't tell people to shut up. You seem to do it repeatedly. It is a pretty poor look for you. If you don't like discussion maybe discussion forums aren't for you?

Cantloseyou · 16/08/2026 13:08

I hope people will be celebrating when people with schizophrenia and EUPD are working in care homes and nurseries. Not to vilify people with those conditions, but these are precisely the sort of ‘non physical illnesses’ Reform are going after.

Ponoka7 · 16/08/2026 13:09

Discodance1988 · 16/08/2026 12:37

Id like to think this would make my parents stop and pause (they are planning on voting reform, purely to stop the boats) since my father receives pip, but I'm sure if they (and everyone else) voted them in they would soon realise the monumental mistake they made, although that's unlikely because the generation who have fallen for reforms lies seem to struggle with accountability

They never think it applies to them. Like all the elderly people who had to come home from Spain, totally shocked because they're, white British, so why did Brexit rules, include them. Meanwhile kids like my DD, working in hospitality, had her dream of working on cruise ships, for the experience, taken away.
@EvieBB I should have been owed £ thousands. I also got refused. Luckily (ha) I hit rock bottom, hospital admissions etc within three months and got it awarded, no back pay of course.

1dayatatime · 16/08/2026 13:09

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 13:01

Public services are the welfare state.

Really? Is the Armed Forces part of the welfare state? Or the Police or Fire Brigade? What about roads are they part of the Welfare State?

SodOffbacktoaibu · 16/08/2026 13:09

Livelovebehappy · 16/08/2026 13:06

1.4% found to be fraudulent. But many more go undetected. Thats my point. Pretty obvious. Not enough people employed to investigate.

It's not obvious. It's an assumption based on your world view.

Lifeomars · 16/08/2026 13:09

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 12:52

Leave pensioners alone. Or should they go and work in the fields for their pensions until they drop down dead. I wonder if their next fantastically well worked out policy will be that everyone over the age of 65 should be pushed off a cliff.

i think some on MN would like to see a Dignitas centre in every town and anyone over retirement age being given an appointment on their 70th birthday 😀

Windsurf · 16/08/2026 13:10

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 10:10

So care to tell us how businesses being forced to pay the first 2 years of sickness is going to help? So none of us can go off sick.Ive never claimed sick pay and have been paying taxes my whole life. Why shouldn’t I have help from the state if I go off long term sick?How is this not going to mean companies are going to simply discriminate when employing and avoid anybody with a history of ill health or who fits a demographic that might mean more likelihood of ill health?

It’s hysterically stupid.

Insurance. About 3.5 to 3.7 million employees are already covered.

This specific type of corporate coverage is known as Group Income Protection (GIP) or Long-Term Disability Income insurance.

Monty36 · 16/08/2026 13:10

DiscoRice · 16/08/2026 13:01

I am also not sure what her having 3 properties had to do with anything either.

I think the point the poster might be making is that she is sufficiently well off to not need to claim anything from the taxpayer at all.

Jellycatspyjamas · 16/08/2026 13:10

Passaggressfedup · 16/08/2026 13:00

For all the sahp who can't work because they need to look after their children when there is no childcare support.

Sounds like they would be the best people to work with disabled children. Some could be trained to become child care worker and access for free childcare for their own kids whilst others could go and worked knowing they will be looked by people with direct experience.

Free training to become qualify.

So rather than pay each parent £500/per month (most common DLA award plus carers allowance), you’d pay parents £1,800 (35 hours minimum wage), plus employer on costs, plus training and insurances, safeguarding provision, plus whatever profit the care company makes to look after their own and other disabled kids?

Ratios would be tight, many disabled kids need 1:1 care, maybe at best 3:1 so it would still cost much more in flat monetary terms.

x2boys · 16/08/2026 13:10

Howlerhog · 16/08/2026 13:04

If she has 3 properties she doesn’t need the money. Why should she be claiming?

She isnt claiming she just could if she wanred to according to the poster that made that post 💁

Gooseling · 16/08/2026 13:11

Binnyforthewin · 16/08/2026 13:08

Please don't tell people to shut up. You seem to do it repeatedly. It is a pretty poor look for you. If you don't like discussion maybe discussion forums aren't for you?

I don’t care if it’s a poor look.

It’s utterly exhausting reading complete and utter privileged ignorant bollocks from people who don’t even understand what PIP is, never mind their lousy and stupid ideas without doing any credible research.

These people SHOULD shut up. Because perhaps a discussion forum isn’t for them if they can’t understand facts or use critical thinking.

TemperanceWest · 16/08/2026 13:11

Tiggy2000 · 16/08/2026 13:08

Not sure what’s funny? I have a cousin like this, owns their own home so no rent or mortgage (inherited, not through hard work). Spends all day in bed and all night partying with their mates. I don’t know how much they get in benefits, but they do get Pip and seem to manage pretty well on it.

I bet they drive their tax payer funded BMW to said parties 🤬

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 13:11

Digerydont · 16/08/2026 12:44

I don't know why the Govt doesn't get claimants to do something in return for their benefits. All the anti claimant sentiment would go, the claimants would gain some feelings of self-worth. Maybe give them 6 months grace to find a job. After that, you do 22 hours a week socially useful work. Employers would be more inclined to employ someone who has actually been doing something constructive. Younger OAPs could act as overseers to ensure that they actually work.

I can't work out whether you're aware of the connotations of the term "overseer" or entirely ignorant of its historical meaning. Judging by your proposals, I'm going to say yes, you are aware and it's something you'd firmly approve of.

Livelovebehappy · 16/08/2026 13:12

malefields · 16/08/2026 11:56

Third world countries (not even “third world” really) don’t have half of the social welfare support in the UK has. There’s no gravy train to climb on.

Not sure what your point is? The gravy train will cease to exist here in a few decades if a welfare review doesnt happen. Because the money pot will be empty. The rate the money is being handed out there will soon be more people taking out than putting in. The rich will have gone, so no more squeezing cash out of them. And then we will all be screwed.

emuloc · 16/08/2026 13:12

Howlerhog · 16/08/2026 13:04

If she has 3 properties she doesn’t need the money. Why should she be claiming?

Well she is not claiming, is she? But apparently she can, with 'self-diagnosed mild anxiety'. That is what that poster claimed. I await an answer to how she 'proved' that she would have been accepted on PIP.

Ponoka7 · 16/08/2026 13:13

EasternStandard · 16/08/2026 13:00

As said for some benefits. The systems are different. Perhaps that time limit works well for them where we have higher dependency.

We are discussing disability benefits, so other benefits are irrelevant. Also Scandinavia and Denmark have really lowered asylum seeker numbers and implemented stricter rules. Not looked at benefits. They instead know that there needs to be work available, before they restrict out of work welfare.

Marroon · 16/08/2026 13:13

Jellycatspyjamas · 16/08/2026 13:10

So rather than pay each parent £500/per month (most common DLA award plus carers allowance), you’d pay parents £1,800 (35 hours minimum wage), plus employer on costs, plus training and insurances, safeguarding provision, plus whatever profit the care company makes to look after their own and other disabled kids?

Ratios would be tight, many disabled kids need 1:1 care, maybe at best 3:1 so it would still cost much more in flat monetary terms.

It’s honestly the most farcical suggestion yet!!

TemperanceWest · 16/08/2026 13:13

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 13:11

I can't work out whether you're aware of the connotations of the term "overseer" or entirely ignorant of its historical meaning. Judging by your proposals, I'm going to say yes, you are aware and it's something you'd firmly approve of.

I had the same thought. Perhaps pp is hoping the OAPs will be provided with a whip and a couple of Alsations each?

EasternStandard · 16/08/2026 13:13

Simonjt · 16/08/2026 13:02

Where we are it ends at 64 and is replaced by an equivalent benefit, thats just the bit that recognises reduced capacity to work, the bits about care etc continue for as long as that person requires care.

Support in work is also much better as its both simple and quick for work places to receive funding for equipment etc.

Disability related aside it seems the benefit system is geared to different outcomes -

The actual length of time people spend on Universal Credit-equivalent safety nets in Scandinavia differs dramatically from the U.K. because the entire system is aggressively structured to prevent long-term dependency.

Twogreenbottles · 16/08/2026 13:14

@TemperanceWest Some pensioners in receipt of the State Pension haven't paid into the pot or have paid very little yet still get the full SP.
Can you clarify why that is?
A woman used to be able to pay a "Married Woman's Stamp" up to 1997 so she could get a pension based on her husband's contributions.
This was for women who hadn't got the full amount of contributions paid in.This was later bolstered by a Government concession.
The government concession allows women reaching state pension under the new rules and who paid the married woman’s stamp to make a claim based on their husband’s NI record.
The rate payable would be a full basic state pension of £129.20 if they are now divorced or widowed, or 60% of the basic state pension - £77.45 per week - if they are married.
Is that what you are talking about?

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 13:16

Marroon · 16/08/2026 13:00

Addressed how and by who? If you have an issue with parents receiving £75 a week for the child’s disability needs and £86 a week for being a full time carer, then who would actually be advocating paying third party providers to provide this care? Do you understand the cost of training and paying someone to manage complex medical needs for a child outside the home?

You'd need to pay for care throughout the night too, so that the parent could be rested for work.

It's almost as if people have knee jerk reactions rather than using their brains for their intended purpose...

Livelovebehappy · 16/08/2026 13:16

KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 11:29

Ok fair enough.

Do you have a toilet? Running water? 999 to call? A light bulb you can switch on? A local school? A library? A fully stocked grocery shop nearby? Roads?

In what ways is "The UK is slowing sinking to the level of a third world country"?

Of course we currently have all those things. But cant you see how everything is falling apart? Entire infrastructure is falling apart in plain sight. Its inevitable how all this is going to end.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread