Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform want to cut PIP

1000 replies

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 09:15

Reform want to cut benefits for disabled people. They want businesses to pay more towards sickness etc. I find it repulsive that they want to do this. When will people understand that they are a bunch of self interested sharks who want to make a stack of dosh for themselves while in govt and that they font give a damn about anyone in need. Why cant the most vulnerable ppl who vote for them see thus. It's astonishing. It's ac joke. I eish ppl who get what Reform.iscreally about and how it manipulates would make sn extra effort to tslk to.ppl who dont seem to get it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Startrekkeruniverse · 16/08/2026 11:30

It needs to be majorly reformed so it can only be claimed by those who truly need it: it’s very easy to make a false claim if you’re prepared to lie. Got a couple of relatives who do just that - an easy £400 extra in their pocket each month.

People who don’t think PIP is being abused are delusional.

Marroon · 16/08/2026 11:31

happybug1234 · 16/08/2026 11:21

If it genuinely is for the extra costs associated with being disabled why can’t we have an ‘expense reclaim’ type system, where you would pay for the help you need and reclaim the expense.

I don’t think 2 week all inclusives are what PIP is designed for

Reclaim what exactly? Do you realise the biggest cost of caring for a disabled child is lost parental income?
Hence the DLA payment to begin with.

LakieLady · 16/08/2026 11:31

FoundAUserNameDownTheSofa · 16/08/2026 09:30

Clacton has one of the highest rates of PIP claimants in the country, at 18% of working adults.

I wonder if the people who vote for Farage realise it’s them that will suffer financially? Maybe they all think their health is bad enough that they’ll qualify for the new scheme but the whole point of it is to reduce the number of people being supported so the likelihood is a good proportion of them would lose out.

My brother lives in Clacton constituency, gets PIP and voted for Farage.

I hope he's aware of this.

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 11:32

BlackRowan · 16/08/2026 11:17

Yes that’s right, so Labour had a chance to do it and Starmer tried. As a party who cares about people they could have done it without throwing all disabled people under the bus. His backbenchers rebelled and got rid of him, because they are idiots. If they don’t fix it, then Reform will come in and it will be much worse

like it or not, a lot of people support bringing PIP under control including those who voted Labour in the last election

Whete did i say Starmer did a good job

OP posts:
KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 11:32

happybug1234 · 16/08/2026 11:29

Yes I made a mistake as I was juggling multiple things whilst typing.

It is obvious to anyone the nearly £800 per claimant a month is a huge amount of money and totally unsustainable. It’s not far off what someone working full time on minimum wage would be taking home after tax.

working and middle income people like myself have had enough now. It’s all got totally out of hand and this is why parties like reform are getting so popular. I look around and think, well what have I got to lose, the country is in the decline and everyone is on the take. If people like you spent more time listening to the concerns of the working people rather than attacking them things might be a bit better.

Not every working person thinks like you.

Not everyone is on the take. That suggests you are.

Not everyone thinks Reform is the answer to all ills - especially based on Farage's track record of doing nothing for for his constituents in any role he has ever held.

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 11:32

DiscoRice · 16/08/2026 11:28

1 amendment might be if a person gets PIP then don't give them disability element under UC as this gives double credit for having the disability

UC is a means tested, and out of work benefit. PIP is not.
They are totally different benefits awarded for different things with different criteria.
No one is getting a "double credit" for the same thing at all. Seeing how PIP can be as low as £30pw, how could someone live on that?

There were plans to make the health element of UC only go to people who also claim PIP. Which makes no sense.

It's not confusing at all. If a person claims PIP and UC stop paying them health element of UC because they have received PIP for that.

LoremIpsumCici · 16/08/2026 11:33

KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 10:13

"the dwindling bunch of taxpayers who fund them all"

The total number of income tax payers in the UK has increased significantly over the last 10 years, rising from roughly 31 million mid-decade to approximately 36.7 million by the 2023/24 tax year

Don’t forget many disabled people on PIP also pay income taxes. I certainly do.

Startrekkeruniverse · 16/08/2026 11:33

PillsBox · 16/08/2026 11:21

He is a liar.

He has lied to them repeatedly.

And no, of I'm not making it up.

What's wrong with you that you cannot accept this?

I agree with you it’s very easy to cheat the system if you’re prepared to fabricate your symptoms. Two of my relatives do it 🤷‍♀️ They say they’re suffering debilitating symptoms to claim but admit to us that they’re lying.

BatchCookBabe · 16/08/2026 11:34

@happybug1234 · Today 10:51

In fact I just checked DLA for 3 children would bring in £9,336 every 4 weeks

Link to this please...

x2boys · 16/08/2026 11:34

Startrekkeruniverse · 16/08/2026 11:30

It needs to be majorly reformed so it can only be claimed by those who truly need it: it’s very easy to make a false claim if you’re prepared to lie. Got a couple of relatives who do just that - an easy £400 extra in their pocket each month.

People who don’t think PIP is being abused are delusional.

You need evidence
And i dont just mean a quick trip to the GP tellung thrn you feel anxouis type of evidence either

BlackRowan · 16/08/2026 11:34

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 11:32

Whete did i say Starmer did a good job

You didn’t, I did

GiaGia16 · 16/08/2026 11:34

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 11:32

It's not confusing at all. If a person claims PIP and UC stop paying them health element of UC because they have received PIP for that.

Seems fair enough.

KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 11:35

happybug1234 · 16/08/2026 11:21

If it genuinely is for the extra costs associated with being disabled why can’t we have an ‘expense reclaim’ type system, where you would pay for the help you need and reclaim the expense.

I don’t think 2 week all inclusives are what PIP is designed for

We've already established that you imaginary holiday friends were not claiming PIP and so not paying for their holiday with PIP.

Gooseling · 16/08/2026 11:35

happybug1234 · 16/08/2026 11:21

If it genuinely is for the extra costs associated with being disabled why can’t we have an ‘expense reclaim’ type system, where you would pay for the help you need and reclaim the expense.

I don’t think 2 week all inclusives are what PIP is designed for

What do you mean if? There is no “if”.

PIP IS GENUINELY to help with daily living and/or mobility costs due to your health condition/disability.

An “expense reclaim” system wouldn’t work. That it is ludicrous idea.

Under an “expense reclaim” system, people on PIP would have to keep receipts, prove every purchase was disability related, submit claims and then wait for someone to decide whether each expense qualifies.

It would be incredibly difficult to decide what actually counts as a disability related expense. For example: if someone bought a £1,000 washing machine because their disability meant they needed to wash clothes more often, would the government reimburse the whole cost, part of it, or nothing? What about supermarket deliveries, takeaways when someone is too unwell to cook, cleaners, or taxis when public transport would cause significant pain? Every individual expense would need to be assessed and justified, creating a huge amount of bureaucracy. And that bureaucracy would itself cost taxpayers money!!!

I do wish people who have no idea about PIP, or what it’s like being disabled/chronically ill would just shut up. It’s exhausting and embarrassing.

BySunnyJadeEagle · 16/08/2026 11:35

Jellycatspyjamas · 16/08/2026 11:17

That “income top up” paid for travel to multiple health appointments, specialist tutoring, replacing things that were damaged and lost directly due to disability, to feed and clothe my kids when my earning capacity was decimated due to the needs created purely by disability.

Additional costs of disability come in many forms, not just the money paid to a private therapist or for specialist aids. The cost of not being able to work is a very real one sustained by many families when caring for a disabled child. Topping up household income is a legitimate use of DLA, evidenced by the eligibility criteria which is that your child needs significantly more care due to disability than a child of the same age not so affected.

So you had some additional costs.

And you also used it as an income top up.

In Reforms proposal you'd still receive help for the additional costs, just not cash to go to other things.

I think that's fair.

That's what the benefit is supposed to be for, additional costs. Not just extra income.

Badbadbunny · 16/08/2026 11:35

SodOffbacktoaibu · 16/08/2026 09:39

Pip is a benefit that allows disabled people to keep working.

So much misinformation about this.

There are thousands of people who can work part time but not full time with chronic illness/disability. PIP helps them get to work with taxis or helps with mobility schemes to get them a car. Otherwise people would be stuck at home.

Reform are also the ones wanting everyone at the office and not working remotely.... So I don't know how this will solve any sort of benefits bill issue. They'll just remove all the ways disabled people currently earn a living!

But Mumsnet is awful about disabled people so I don't expect much uproar here.

Only around 15% of PIP claimants are in work though. The vast majority aren't.

Jellycatspyjamas · 16/08/2026 11:35

happybug1234 · 16/08/2026 11:17

£194.60 a week that is a huge amount of money can’t you recognise that ??

That’s £778 every 4 weeks! That’s a huge amount of money, and many families have multiple children on this plus all the other UC. They will be taking home more than a lot of high income families working full time in a lot of cases.

Can you recognise that a parent caring for their disabled child is considerably cheaper than any kind of paid for care? Parents earning capacity is completely compromised when their child has a disability that qualifies for maximum DLA, you’re talking about children who need very high levels of support for daily living, not a touch of anxiety and dyslexia.

For high rate care you’re looking at extensive care through the night, do you have any idea how much that costs in carers if the parent doesn’t do it? For high rate mobility you’re talking about kids who have significant mobility difficulties again, a parent providing that support is considerably cheaper than having carers come in.

If we don’t support parents to care for their kids with significant disabilities, they will need to return to full time work, and that care will fall to paid service providers, because the child needs care regardless of who does it. Believe me, the £850 or so every 4 weeks wouldn’t pay for a week of provided care for a child with disabilities so significant as to meet high care and mobility DLA.

Angela59 · 16/08/2026 11:35

Cutting benefits of all kinds is inevitable I’m afraid, if we don’t then the system will collapse and people will then realise reform of the system is better than no system at all. We are currently borrowing to pay interests on loans. Anyone with an ounce of financial intelligence will realise it can’t carry on the way it is currently.

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 11:35

GiaGia16 · 16/08/2026 11:34

Seems fair enough.

I think it would save a lot of money.

Lifeomars · 16/08/2026 11:36

I think Farage will be gone sooner rather than later, it is all starting to unravel. Clacton was a hollow victory, the investigation into his undeclared £5 million began again immediately, and there seem to be new revelations about other irregularities on a weekly basis. There must be several moles in the Reform camp. Farage is tetchy, tired and the "man of the people" mask slips regularly. Jenrick is waiting in the wings, he wants to be leader but Reform is Farage, it will fade to the fringes once he has gone

StressedOutPeanut · 16/08/2026 11:36

Does not surprise me they'll also privatise the NHS.

LoremIpsumCici · 16/08/2026 11:36

happybug1234 · 16/08/2026 10:48

Ok PIP/DLA it’s the same thing my point still stands

So they couldn’t have worked overtime or saved up? Must be benefits because autism,

happybug1234 · 16/08/2026 11:37

KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 11:32

Not every working person thinks like you.

Not everyone is on the take. That suggests you are.

Not everyone thinks Reform is the answer to all ills - especially based on Farage's track record of doing nothing for for his constituents in any role he has ever held.

Not everyone but a significant amount are getting fed up. I speak with a lot of people/families we all feel the same.

I’m not saying reform are the answer, but they come up with a lot of things that working people agree with. If the mainstream parties just woke up and actually listened to our concerns Reform wouldn’t even exist.

LoremIpsumCici · 16/08/2026 11:38

Badbadbunny · 16/08/2026 11:35

Only around 15% of PIP claimants are in work though. The vast majority aren't.

That’s because of austerity which tightened the requirements so only the most severe cases are eligible when they replaced adult DLA with PIP. So many disabled people have already lost out on financial support. It’s why we are the #1 demographic mostly likely to be living in absolute poverty.

DiscoRice · 16/08/2026 11:38

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 11:32

It's not confusing at all. If a person claims PIP and UC stop paying them health element of UC because they have received PIP for that.

They are different benefits, with different criteria.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.