Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Who peeked?

298 replies

youalright · 12/08/2026 19:17

Admit it who peeked, can't of just been me 🤣🤣🤣

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
diddl · 13/08/2026 14:09

It was a lovely night last night & the sun stayed too bright to look at at any point.

If you didn't have glasses you wouldn't have known that anything was happening I don't think.

Perhaps that's why some people were underwhelmed?

I thought it was fabulous!

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:09

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 12:00

You're right you can, but it's unlikely, at least at a level which causes symptoms.

Of the approximately 40 million people who watched the 1999 eclipse, 28 had reported injuries from staring at the eclipse for less than a minute.

There was no recorded case of someone having damaged after an eclipse were they only glimpsed for a second or less.

BBC

"After the previous total eclipse of the sun that was visible in the UK in 1999, around 70 people were left with damaged sight.

"Many of them had spent less than a minute looking at the spectacle, without realising they were harming their eyes."

Two happy-looking women are outdoors under a clear blue sky, wearing cardboard eclipse-viewing glasses. The person in the foreground is holding the glasses up with both hands and wearing a green-and-white striped top, several necklaces, bracelets and a...

Eclipse warning: All the key signs you may have damaged your eyes

Symptoms after looking at the sun without eclipse glasses can include blurred vision

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gk0dq81j2o

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:19

iloveanearlynight · 13/08/2026 13:47

*Can't HAVE! Not 'of', OP!

She started a thread about looking at the eclipse punctuated with many laughing emojis. I don't think she's all there.

nomas · 13/08/2026 14:21

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:19

She started a thread about looking at the eclipse punctuated with many laughing emojis. I don't think she's all there.

It’s not that deep. Lots of people have said they looked.

Allseeingallknowing · 13/08/2026 14:21

Considering all the information and publicity about this, I can only conclude the idiots who peeked belonged to the “ it won’t happen to me club!”

Sahara123 · 13/08/2026 14:36

No, because I value my eyesight

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 14:45

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:09

BBC

"After the previous total eclipse of the sun that was visible in the UK in 1999, around 70 people were left with damaged sight.

"Many of them had spent less than a minute looking at the spectacle, without realising they were harming their eyes."

Yes, this is what I mean. It was 70 people, 28 of which looked for less than a minute (which is quite a long time).

ManipulativeLiar · 13/08/2026 16:17

Allseeingallknowing · 13/08/2026 14:21

Considering all the information and publicity about this, I can only conclude the idiots who peeked belonged to the “ it won’t happen to me club!”

Exactly. They seem to think they are daring rebels rather than ignorant idiots

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:34

nomas · 13/08/2026 14:21

It’s not that deep. Lots of people have said they looked.

Good luck to you

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:36

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 14:45

Yes, this is what I mean. It was 70 people, 28 of which looked for less than a minute (which is quite a long time).

Less than a minute is inclusive of 1 second, 2 seconds, 3 seconds... It includes seconds 1 to 59

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:38

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:36

Less than a minute is inclusive of 1 second, 2 seconds, 3 seconds... It includes seconds 1 to 59

Edited

Actually less than that, milliseconds too, but I don't think some of you 'peekers' are quite ready for that level

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 17:32

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:38

Actually less than that, milliseconds too, but I don't think some of you 'peekers' are quite ready for that level

Of course it technically does.
But use a bit of logic here. Most of the cases involved more than a minute, and I don't think there's any doubt that risk is correlated to length of exposure.

So yes it is theoretically possible the all 28 people who viewed it for less than a minute, got damaged from one second of viewing or less, then nothing for the other 59 seconds, and then all the other injuries take place at more than the minute mark. But surely you realise that makes no sense

Out of curiosity, for those of us who peaked, should we have stared at it for a minute instead? Is the risk the same?

youalright · 13/08/2026 18:00

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:19

She started a thread about looking at the eclipse punctuated with many laughing emojis. I don't think she's all there.

Excuse me. I would rather be bad at English then be nasty. Mumsnet is for everyone people who english isn't their first language. People like me who missed a lot of education due to disability, people with dyslexia. Maybe be a little bit mindful that not everyone had the same life and upbringing as you and check your privelage.

OP posts:
BagsyTimBradford · 13/08/2026 18:02

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:09

BBC

"After the previous total eclipse of the sun that was visible in the UK in 1999, around 70 people were left with damaged sight.

"Many of them had spent less than a minute looking at the spectacle, without realising they were harming their eyes."

Presumably those 70 people had immediate issues for the numbers to be attributed to watching the eclipse. What won't be known is how it contributed in those that went on to develop sight loss due to macula degeneration,
of which sun damage is a big factor.

Protect your peepers peeps, wear decent sunglasses when in the sun going forward. 😎

Janecat23 · 13/08/2026 18:03

Yes. Kept wondering if I’d wake up blind. Then discovered DS no2 used to do dares with his friend to see who could stare at the sun the longest 🙄. Thankfully he isn’t blind either but honestly there are some things you don’t want to know 🤦🏽‍♀️.

youalright · 13/08/2026 18:03

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:34

Good luck to you

I'd respond but I can't read your comment as im blind from looking at the sun for 2 seconds 👩‍🦯

OP posts:
ManipulativeLiar · 13/08/2026 18:08

youalright · 13/08/2026 18:00

Excuse me. I would rather be bad at English then be nasty. Mumsnet is for everyone people who english isn't their first language. People like me who missed a lot of education due to disability, people with dyslexia. Maybe be a little bit mindful that not everyone had the same life and upbringing as you and check your privelage.

If you missed a lot of your education then surely it’s even more important to listen to official advice rather than think you know better? You’ve already experienced the issues of disability too

Booboobagins · 13/08/2026 18:16

I peeked through the trees.

Did anyone notice that the sun was glorious afterwards, real sunburst. Just like in the telly tubbys!

youalright · 13/08/2026 18:17

ManipulativeLiar · 13/08/2026 18:08

If you missed a lot of your education then surely it’s even more important to listen to official advice rather than think you know better? You’ve already experienced the issues of disability too

I did listen thats why I didn't stare at it

OP posts:
Bridesmaidorexfriend · 13/08/2026 18:41

My eyes are fine today! Someone will be along to tell me that doesn’t mean anything but I’m relieved lol

Blades2 · 13/08/2026 18:43

Never underestimate the predictability of stupid.

Thegirlwhowent · 13/08/2026 19:09

NotTheHRPolice · 13/08/2026 10:57

‘tis often a very strong indicator……..

Hmmm... An ellipsis is just three dots. Is incorrect punctuation also an indicator of something?

supersop60 · 13/08/2026 19:15

SweetBaklava · 12/08/2026 19:21

I did a few times… it was a bit underwhelming to be honest. Maybe it would have been better with the specs

The only time anyone coukd have looked was during totality, which we didn’t have and were never going to have in the uk.
its a reminder how strong the sun is, that it can be 90% covered and still be hot and bright. ( the moon is far away, not like clouds which are only hundreds of feet away)
And yes, with the specs you could see everything.

Dancingintherain09 · 13/08/2026 19:30

youalright · 12/08/2026 19:17

Admit it who peeked, can't of just been me 🤣🤣🤣

We put together 6 pairs of sunglasses. We peeked quickly through that. They were so dark we could see anything else through them 😆.

AlPaccacino · 13/08/2026 22:16

Photo through glasses and a meteor

Who peeked?
Who peeked?
Swipe left for the next trending thread