Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Who peeked?

298 replies

youalright · 12/08/2026 19:17

Admit it who peeked, can't of just been me 🤣🤣🤣

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 09:26

youalright · 13/08/2026 05:54

So you've never looked at the sun?

Not during an eclipse, no.

AzureCats · 13/08/2026 09:27

NotTheHRPolice · 12/08/2026 23:29

Everyone posting on this site has pretty much the entire history of human learning in their pocket and powerful search engines (no, not AI!) with which to find any information they need. About the basics of languages (including English) and how to safely watch a solar eclipse. They were likely on social media or news apps which publicised this event weeks ago. There isn’t really any excuse for anyone not knowing anything nowadays. It’s general laziness that people aren’t interested in anything more intellectual than Love Island.

e.g. the attached geniuses, who haven’t realised that solar eclipses happen in other places than the UK, or that there are other ways we can understand the impact of using eyes or phone cameras to look directly at the sun. One got as far as googling but didn’t bother to delve any deeper. It’s utterly depressing.

This is peak comedy. Glad I came back to this thread. 😂

Shatteredallthetimelately · 13/08/2026 09:40

Pieceofpurplesky · 13/08/2026 00:17

I did. I swear it was darker in '99 (I think that was the date)

I agree here, I was out in the garden then, lovely day weather wise again not to bothered about seeing the eclipse but I remember it also went pretty cold and the birds went totally silent.

youalright · 13/08/2026 10:53

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 09:26

Not during an eclipse, no.

The sun is the sun, eclipse or not the danger comes from when its covered you can look at it for longer without realising but nobody on this thread did that people looked at it for a second and looked away just like when you catch the sun with your eyes normally. If people where staring directly at it for minutes you would have a point

OP posts:
NotTheHRPolice · 13/08/2026 10:57

Thegirlwhowent · 13/08/2026 08:09

@NotTheHRPolice I agree that people's apparent ignorance can be depressing. I just thought it was harsh that you judged her for using 'of' instead of 'have' and assuming she therefore didn't know much. Yes, we all have instant access to a world of information but we can't possibly know or understand all of it. We all have our own weaknesses and strengths and different interests.

‘tis often a very strong indicator……..

NotTheHRPolice · 13/08/2026 10:58

youalright · 13/08/2026 10:53

The sun is the sun, eclipse or not the danger comes from when its covered you can look at it for longer without realising but nobody on this thread did that people looked at it for a second and looked away just like when you catch the sun with your eyes normally. If people where staring directly at it for minutes you would have a point

Did your ophthalmology degree come from Temu?

arethereanyleftatall · 13/08/2026 11:09

Off the back of this thread I had a complete panic and booked dd in for an optician’s appointment this morning. Cos we watched the whole thing for an hour intermittently staring at sun. Her eyes are fine. They said if there was a problem we would have known in first few hours afterwards which is not what Google said. My appointment is tomorrow!

aniloD · 13/08/2026 11:41

In 1966 when I was 11 we were all given some coloured cellophane and went into the school yard to watch. I don't think we'll ever know if it caused any damage but certainly not everyone who watched it then is blind now

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 11:55

youalright · 13/08/2026 10:53

The sun is the sun, eclipse or not the danger comes from when its covered you can look at it for longer without realising but nobody on this thread did that people looked at it for a second and looked away just like when you catch the sun with your eyes normally. If people where staring directly at it for minutes you would have a point

That's what you aren't understanding. It doesn't need minutes it's seconds. You can damage your eyes permanently in seconds.

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 12:00

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 11:55

That's what you aren't understanding. It doesn't need minutes it's seconds. You can damage your eyes permanently in seconds.

You're right you can, but it's unlikely, at least at a level which causes symptoms.

Of the approximately 40 million people who watched the 1999 eclipse, 28 had reported injuries from staring at the eclipse for less than a minute.

There was no recorded case of someone having damaged after an eclipse were they only glimpsed for a second or less.

ApolloandDaphne · 13/08/2026 12:02

I squinted at it briefly when I was on the bus but there was a bit of cloud cover. I saw a glimpse of the crescent shape.

Cheesestringsasatreat · 13/08/2026 12:03

arethereanyleftatall · 13/08/2026 11:09

Off the back of this thread I had a complete panic and booked dd in for an optician’s appointment this morning. Cos we watched the whole thing for an hour intermittently staring at sun. Her eyes are fine. They said if there was a problem we would have known in first few hours afterwards which is not what Google said. My appointment is tomorrow!

You watched without the glasses etc?
What did he say would have been the problem in the first few hours afterwards-the symptoms?

arethereanyleftatall · 13/08/2026 12:06

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 11:55

That's what you aren't understanding. It doesn't need minutes it's seconds. You can damage your eyes permanently in seconds.

But if you can damage your eyes permanent in seconds, doesn’t that mean we’re all very often at risk? I think look at it by accident fairly frequently, for example when driving and it’s right in your eyes or when I try and wash my roof lantern. Or kids playing at the beach looking for their patents.

arethereanyleftatall · 13/08/2026 12:32

Cheesestringsasatreat · 13/08/2026 12:03

You watched without the glasses etc?
What did he say would have been the problem in the first few hours afterwards-the symptoms?

Well we had normal cheap sunglasses on. So our vision would have started to go blurry etc in the first few hours according to the 3 opticians I spoke to this morning. Yes, looked at it - on and off from 6.30pm to 7.30pm

diddl · 13/08/2026 12:47

I can't look at the sun even sunglasses on.

I didn't know people could😊

arethereanyleftatall · 13/08/2026 12:53

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 12:00

You're right you can, but it's unlikely, at least at a level which causes symptoms.

Of the approximately 40 million people who watched the 1999 eclipse, 28 had reported injuries from staring at the eclipse for less than a minute.

There was no recorded case of someone having damaged after an eclipse were they only glimpsed for a second or less.

Thank you for this. Very reassuring.
does it count cumulatively or only in a row? Eg look at it for 10 seconds, away for a couple of minutes on and on for an hour.

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 13:03

arethereanyleftatall · 13/08/2026 12:53

Thank you for this. Very reassuring.
does it count cumulatively or only in a row? Eg look at it for 10 seconds, away for a couple of minutes on and on for an hour.

I'm not sure. Sorry. But if you find out please let me know.

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 13:19

arethereanyleftatall · 13/08/2026 12:06

But if you can damage your eyes permanent in seconds, doesn’t that mean we’re all very often at risk? I think look at it by accident fairly frequently, for example when driving and it’s right in your eyes or when I try and wash my roof lantern. Or kids playing at the beach looking for their patents.

The normal brightness of the sun means that you naturally can't look directly at the sun long for a sustained period. In an eclipse, that instinct to look away is absent, even though the magnitude of the rays is still present, and people therefore can look directly for a longer period (though still seconds) and unknowingly cause damage. The damage isn't immediately obvious. It can develop over time.

nomas · 13/08/2026 13:21

I peeked a couple of times. I did see blobs in my eyes for quite a while after.

I am prescribed glasses but never wear them, maybe the sun beams will act like laser beams and fix my eyes.

APurpleSquirrel · 13/08/2026 13:41

We watched it from Sidmouth seafront using my digital telescope - got some great photos, could even see some sun spots. I peeked a couple of times, mainly when repositioning the telescope.

Who peeked?
Who peeked?
Who peeked?
namechange62 · 13/08/2026 13:41

Even with glasses I accidentally peeked! Twice.. whilst adjusting them.(I'm a spectacle wearer anyway and was trying to get a tighter fit and they slipped... I had spots for a few minutes..
I watched it from a beach in North Cornwall and it was amazing! It was a lovely atmosphere. Of course it wasn't as dark as 1999 but it was only a partial eclipse. It went noticeably cooler and darker and the seagulls started heading home..

Who peeked?
iloveanearlynight · 13/08/2026 13:47

youalright · 12/08/2026 19:17

Admit it who peeked, can't of just been me 🤣🤣🤣

*Can't HAVE! Not 'of', OP!

fivepenny · 13/08/2026 13:49

Well checking back in to say I can still see normally this morning!

LBFseBrom · 13/08/2026 13:58

iloveanearlynight · 13/08/2026 13:47

*Can't HAVE! Not 'of', OP!

Very well said!

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 14:03

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 13:19

The normal brightness of the sun means that you naturally can't look directly at the sun long for a sustained period. In an eclipse, that instinct to look away is absent, even though the magnitude of the rays is still present, and people therefore can look directly for a longer period (though still seconds) and unknowingly cause damage. The damage isn't immediately obvious. It can develop over time.

As someone who peaked, the instinct to look away was still there, just as strong. No one could look for long even if they wanted to. It might be more of an issue with a higher % covered. Without the glasses (or stacked sunglasses or something that reduces the light) if just looked like the normal sub anyway, just slightly odd shaped.