Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To agree with Andy Burnham that it’s about time the middle classes took their fair share

1000 replies

Morningteacup2 · 11/08/2026 18:11

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/08/11/burnham-middle-class-areas-must-take-more-hotel-migrants/

Not a huge fan of Labour I must say, but this is well overdue!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
OonaStubbs · 11/08/2026 23:50

We need to stop accepting "asylum seekers" and drastically cut immigration so that there are jobs, houses and resources for our own people.

ThingsThatMakeYouGoHmmmmmmmmm · 11/08/2026 23:50

Cut all foreign aid. All monies to be spent on building internment centres ( razor wire and tents ) on Salisbury plain or Otterburn army training areas. Nobody allowed out unless and until deportation. Leave the ECHR, introduce a British Bill of Rights in it's place ( only applicable to citizens of British birth ). Immediate and effective crackdown on the black economy ( vape shops, barbers,car washes,nail bars, all food delivery services).

That would be a start.

RosesAndPeoniesAndIrises · 11/08/2026 23:54

bozzabollix · 11/08/2026 23:49

Yes I live in a very middle class, fairly wealthy area with over 90% white people.

Totally agree we should do our bit. I’ve lived in areas happily before with a large immigrant population and it just means you can get your hands on very nice food. Places like London and Brum are used to it.

Thing is people will kick off about asylum seekers having access to somewhere nice - it’ll be something seen as too good for them by the wider public.

Ah yes, the food. I’m particularly excited about the Somalian restaurants we’ll be getting soon.

EmeraldRoulette · 11/08/2026 23:56

@olivepicanto i’m glad you didn’t have any trouble

One of those hotels brought us Mohamed Mirzai though I think?

Speaking of which, that brings me to another point… I don’t understand why they have to serve their sentence here before they get deported. It just leads to more delays and problems.

LuckyHazelFox · 11/08/2026 23:56

olivepicanto · 11/08/2026 23:46

are you suggesting I'm lying?

look up Perth. Incredibly middle class. Look up the queens hotel. Then look up the Raddison.

how fucking dare you imply I'm lying

What would I find if I looked them up?

TidyPearlBee · 11/08/2026 23:56

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Somerford · 11/08/2026 23:57

olivepicanto · 11/08/2026 23:48

And another implying I'm lying

open your eyes and ears. Move outside your wee box.

The ONLY trouble we have had has been from low lives, punching down for a change.

I didn't merely imply it, I said it outright with no ambiguity. I'll say it again if you like, absolute horseshit 😂

Windsurf · Yesterday 00:01

olivepicanto · 11/08/2026 23:46

are you suggesting I'm lying?

look up Perth. Incredibly middle class. Look up the queens hotel. Then look up the Raddison.

how fucking dare you imply I'm lying

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/asylum-seeker-spied-naked-swimmer-36954581

I looked it up.

"Not really a big deal" as you said. "No issues"

Asylum seeker spied on naked swimmer months after touching two women on trains

Mohammed Mirzai, who attacked two women on separate trains several months before he was arrested at Perth Leisure Pool, has been jailed.

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/asylum-seeker-spied-naked-swimmer-36954581

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 00:04

Windsurf · Yesterday 00:01

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/asylum-seeker-spied-naked-swimmer-36954581

I looked it up.

"Not really a big deal" as you said. "No issues"

Ah, thought so.

RosesAndPeoniesAndIrises · Yesterday 00:04

BlaiseAnais94 · 11/08/2026 22:24

Because we colonised huge swathes of the world, destabilised large numbers of countries and plundered their wealth to financially elevate our small island country. Many of those countries indigenous people were decimated not only by violence but by the rampant disease we brought.

We then, in most cases, fucked off out leaving immature leadership and countries unable to effectively lead themselves and prosper.

We have also, in more recent times, used our power to interfere in the governance of other nations, start wars under the guise of humanitarian motives, destabilising entire geographical regions.

We are now reaping what we sowed and to do anything other than be humanitarian and accommodating to migrants would be political suicide on the, already unstable, world stage. And, pretty revolting.

What does this potential “political suicide” look like? How does it compare to social and civilisational suicide? Like importing what you seem to suggest could be infinite numbers of young men from cultures with completely different values to our own at huge speed. With unknown and unpredictable consequences in terms of clashes between different value systems/religions, lack of the civilising effect of women on these young men. Throw in a good dose of racial animus against white people (because of our ancestors “sins” - even though other races did similarly - it was Africans who sold other Africans to European slave traders for example). How’s this all going to look in a few decades time?

Windsurf · Yesterday 00:07

RosesAndPeoniesAndIrises · 11/08/2026 23:54

Ah yes, the food. I’m particularly excited about the Somalian restaurants we’ll be getting soon.

Obesity doesn't happen without essential skilled worker visa help from poor immigrants to cook and ferry food to the doors of the starving middle classes. Think of their stomachs won't you.

Xanhi · Yesterday 00:09

A lot are housed in London, including in my middle class area. I can't say it bothers me at all. It is the entire asylum system that is not fit for purpose. I don't hold it against the individuals.

I notice Andy isn't planning to move asylum seekers from London to Manchester as part of his levelling up plans. Maybe he doesn't think that would be so popular with the northern voters he is trying to get back from Reform.

BlaiseAnais94 · Yesterday 00:14

EmeraldRoulette · 11/08/2026 23:12

@BlaiseAnais94 ”Current data shows migrants mainly come from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Bangladesh and Syriah.
Pakistan and Bangladesh instability stems from dicing up British India and the other 3 have had direct British military interference”

can you please explain to me why you believe that impacts the decision of a young man coming here from India or Bangladesh in 2026? I am looking for something more direct than a decision that was made in the 1940s. I fully appreciate that decision might have impacted his grandparents. I’m a lot less clear how you think it affects things now.

I didnt mention modern day India

I mentioned Bangladesh and Pakistan. But the underlying reason is the same.

Decolonisation wasn’t a clean break. It left behind institutions, language and education systems shaped by Britain, alongside borders and political structures that affected the early development of these states.

Over subsequent decades, migration created large Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Indian communities in Britain. Those communities created family, social and employment networks that make Britain a more accessible destination for later generations. Shared language, historical connections and established communities are all recognised factors influencing where people choose to migrate.

History doesn’t dictate an individual's decision, but it helps explain why these migration routes and connections exist in the first place.

The majority of migrants from all three countries are students, with the next highest group for India and Pakistan being work visas. They are helping top up university budgets with their overseas fees and filling roles we can't fill with non-immigrant citizens.

namethisbird · Yesterday 00:17

BlaiseAnais94 · 11/08/2026 22:24

Because we colonised huge swathes of the world, destabilised large numbers of countries and plundered their wealth to financially elevate our small island country. Many of those countries indigenous people were decimated not only by violence but by the rampant disease we brought.

We then, in most cases, fucked off out leaving immature leadership and countries unable to effectively lead themselves and prosper.

We have also, in more recent times, used our power to interfere in the governance of other nations, start wars under the guise of humanitarian motives, destabilising entire geographical regions.

We are now reaping what we sowed and to do anything other than be humanitarian and accommodating to migrants would be political suicide on the, already unstable, world stage. And, pretty revolting.

oh give over will you.
That was 100s of years ago. The situation we are dealing with today is very different, with increasing numbers of people arriving through illegal routes and serious concerns about crimes committed by some individuals.
Why do you think there is so much concern from the government around the publication and transparency of crime statistics involving immigrants? If we are serious about tackling illegal migration, we need to be willing to consider bold measures, including offshore processing and a fundamental reassessment of our ECHR membership.

To answer the OP’s question — no, I don’t think the Government should be placing asylum seekers in areas where local communities have consistently expressed strong opposition to the current immigration policy. If the Government is going to pursue this approach, there should at least be greater consideration of where the policy has public support, rather than disproportionately placing the impact on communities that have voted against it. Conservative areas shouldn’t simply be expected to absorb the consequences of policies they didn’t support, IMO.

dudsville · Yesterday 00:17

I don't know if I'm MC or not, but my problem with the wording is that it's as if he's saying I've denied the migrants housing. I vote Labour, unless strategically required to vote otherwise to advoid right wing groups gaining power. We're socialists in my house. Never once have I been asked to vote on whether immigrants, asylum seekers, etc., can live in my area. I am not denying anyone. I'm voting for a party and then getting on with my day. If he's saying they need to build some housing in my area, crack on, this is not something within my power to sort out.

RosesAndPeoniesAndIrises · Yesterday 00:20

RosesAndPeoniesAndIrises · Yesterday 00:04

What does this potential “political suicide” look like? How does it compare to social and civilisational suicide? Like importing what you seem to suggest could be infinite numbers of young men from cultures with completely different values to our own at huge speed. With unknown and unpredictable consequences in terms of clashes between different value systems/religions, lack of the civilising effect of women on these young men. Throw in a good dose of racial animus against white people (because of our ancestors “sins” - even though other races did similarly - it was Africans who sold other Africans to European slave traders for example). How’s this all going to look in a few decades time?

Just to add @BlaiseAnais94 you seem to feel we have a responsibility to take any immigrant who wants to come here because of our past actions and meddling in other countries. So you don’t seem to believe the effect on our country and our citizens should be of any consideration. If they want to come, it is our duty to take them. By this logic, the number of immigrants we should take is only limited by how many wish to come. The population of Pakistan is 260 million. The current population of Africa is 1.59 billion, and growing fast. Can you see where I’m going with this?

EmeraldRoulette · Yesterday 00:20

@BlaiseAnais94 but you did mention the partition of India?

On this thread at least, I don’t think anyone is objecting to long established communities.

it sounds like you’re saying that’s a reason why Britain might be targeted by those who choose to come in by falsely trying to claim asylum? I’m not convinced but happy to agree to disagree.

i’m going to bed now, so I’m not ignoring you, but it looks like we’ve been discovered by a very alarming troll anyway….!

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 00:25

olivepicanto · 11/08/2026 23:48

And another implying I'm lying

open your eyes and ears. Move outside your wee box.

The ONLY trouble we have had has been from low lives, punching down for a change.

Low lives from a culture that treat women as chattels?

BlaiseAnais94 · Yesterday 00:54

RosesAndPeoniesAndIrises · Yesterday 00:20

Just to add @BlaiseAnais94 you seem to feel we have a responsibility to take any immigrant who wants to come here because of our past actions and meddling in other countries. So you don’t seem to believe the effect on our country and our citizens should be of any consideration. If they want to come, it is our duty to take them. By this logic, the number of immigrants we should take is only limited by how many wish to come. The population of Pakistan is 260 million. The current population of Africa is 1.59 billion, and growing fast. Can you see where I’m going with this?

I don't feel like we have a responsibility to take in every single immigrant who wants to be here and have not said that at all. But, we do have a responsibility as people to highlight where echo chambers are whipping up a frenzy and those with short memories fail to accept the countries responsibility for it's past.

People migrate here either here on work visas and are therefore required to do a job noone in the country can or will do, are on a family visa and supported by someone earning enough to do so, on a student visa paying higher fees that allow British citizens to pay less, one of the much smaller numbers on other visas including those tied to historical ties or seeking / given asylum.

Those are the ones that we do have a moral responsibility to accept when they meet the requirements for asylum. And the rest overwhelmingly have an economic benefit for us.

Only about half asylum claims are accepted. And they account for 10% of the total population growth in the past 10 years.

As for causing social and civil unrest due to clashes in culture and the like. Yes, there will be instances of immigrants, both legal and illegal commuting violent crimes. However, the overwhelming perpetrators of violent crimes in this country are white men and there are increasingly worrying Incel movements affecting young men and boys attitudes to women.

The violent clashes caused by Britain first style marches caused by certain media outlets whipping up a frenzy, funded by right wing lobbyists, has been far more concerning and damaging to this country in the past few years than asylum seekers. If you are concerned about civil unreast the call is coming from inside the house.

SeriousCandles · Yesterday 01:03

OT but it’s Somalis not Somalians.

researchers3 · Yesterday 01:19

Dappy777 · 11/08/2026 19:55

Deep down, the left hate middle-class English people. HATE them. So the thought of ruining their lives by dumping hundreds of young men on them is delightful.

Lots of 'left' voters are middle class - almost everyone i know in fact. What are you on about?

hcee19 · Yesterday 01:22

Persephonia1966 · 11/08/2026 18:37

You can't apply for asylum outside of the UK.
The way the law works is you first have to come to the UK then, once there, you can submit an asylum application. This either means coming to the UK by plane on a different sort of visa or entering it in an "irregular" fashion (the small boats). Usually people entering in this way will make themselves immediately known to the authorities, at which point they become asylum seekers and their claim is processed. If their claim is successful they then become refugees. While waiting for their claim to be processed they aren't living here illegally. The migrants in the migrant centres/hotels are living where they are told to live.

I don't like the current system, but we chose to make the laws the way they are. People following those laws/that system may be good people or may be awful people. But the term "illegal" isn't a helpful one.

The illegal isn't helpful to who, exactly? My friends daughter was in charge of a hotel where these illegal immigrants were housed. There was trouble from day one, assaulting the cleaners , taking furniture, trying to sell it, constant complaints about the food, lack of money, demanding better clothes than they were given,the list goes on & on. I was in shock, a country has taken them in, feeding them , putting a roof over their heads etc, absolutely disgusting behaviour. I am so sick of what it is costing the british taxpayer. Meanwhile homeless people don't even get a look in....

olivepicanto · Yesterday 01:27

Windsurf · Yesterday 00:01

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/asylum-seeker-spied-naked-swimmer-36954581

I looked it up.

"Not really a big deal" as you said. "No issues"

That's all you've got 🤣🤣

the trouble has come from the "protesters". And by "protesters" I mean those with the DA records who stalk and taunt women. The fine upstanding protectors.

you lot are really clutching at straws.

BlaiseAnais94 · Yesterday 01:45

EmeraldRoulette · Yesterday 00:20

@BlaiseAnais94 but you did mention the partition of India?

On this thread at least, I don’t think anyone is objecting to long established communities.

it sounds like you’re saying that’s a reason why Britain might be targeted by those who choose to come in by falsely trying to claim asylum? I’m not convinced but happy to agree to disagree.

i’m going to bed now, so I’m not ignoring you, but it looks like we’ve been discovered by a very alarming troll anyway….!

Why would you think I'm a troll? Because I'm not contributing to the echo chamber?

The post mentioned British India and it's partition which is not the same as modern day India.

Although, the underlying reasons for why someone would immigrate from India or Bangladesh to the UK are ultimately the same, the overall immigrant profiles are not.

Alot of posters are using migrant, asylum seeker and illegal (immigrant) interchangeably and it isnt clear if we are still just discussing asylum seekers or all types of immigrants.

I'm not saying anyone on this thread does have an objection to the longstanding communities, although I don't agree that is the case. This thread is alarmingly similar to the discussion and news of 2024 when we lost a large number of skilled and very much needed migrants due to the increase in rascist attacks caused by echo chambers like this one.

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · Yesterday 02:03

RosesAndPeoniesAndIrises · 11/08/2026 18:58

Are people still trotting out this line?

Yup yup they are.
I think the only ones who believe it mind are those trotting out the line, everyone else can see through it.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.