Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Mumsnet gives better advice than ChatGPT?

151 replies

ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 10:06

Is Mumsnet better than CHAT GPT for advice?
AIBU- Mumsnet is full of genuine advice
AINBU- CHAT GPT is great and/or is on Mumsnet anyway

OP posts:
ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 11:26

OnlyUsername · 06/08/2026 11:24

Both sides are often incorrect. I am a trained financial adviser and the incorrect information stated so confidently on here and via AI crap gives me the willies.

Makes sense as chat gpt os collecting all the incorrect info!

OP posts:
SillyDoriswithaDangler · 06/08/2026 11:28

Chat GPT could never match the utter cuntery I’ve seen on here over the years.

SusanJJ · 06/08/2026 11:28

ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 10:23

Yes good point- maybe CHAT GPT is gentler and Mumsnet tough love?

Well no because the real people on Mumsnet express all kinds of opinions and attitudes. AI is waffle tending towards repeating whatever the poster has said or is looking for. Do you mind me asking if you are AI or real? I can't imagine that a real mumsnet user would think it generally offers 'tough love' , there is such variety of responses from pointless bullying through joking to good sense and kindness.

Backedoffhackedoff · 06/08/2026 11:30

cardibach · 06/08/2026 11:08

You would trust it for legal advice? Really? Even judges can’t spot it’s hallucinations readily apparently
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jun/06/high-court-tells-uk-lawyers-to-urgently-stop-misuse-of-ai-in-legal-work

people cite this so often and I actually think it’s hilarious. Lawyers and barristers can make up or misrepresent Case law. It’s up to the judge to know, or check if they don’t. How is that chat gpts fault?! Arguing different points of law is the point of the court.

cardibach · 06/08/2026 11:36

Backedoffhackedoff · 06/08/2026 11:30

people cite this so often and I actually think it’s hilarious. Lawyers and barristers can make up or misrepresent Case law. It’s up to the judge to know, or check if they don’t. How is that chat gpts fault?! Arguing different points of law is the point of the court.

Not with entirely invented cases it’s not.

ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 11:43

SusanJJ · 06/08/2026 11:28

Well no because the real people on Mumsnet express all kinds of opinions and attitudes. AI is waffle tending towards repeating whatever the poster has said or is looking for. Do you mind me asking if you are AI or real? I can't imagine that a real mumsnet user would think it generally offers 'tough love' , there is such variety of responses from pointless bullying through joking to good sense and kindness.

Yes maybe you expressed better what I meant that mumsnet will give the variety.

OP posts:
ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 11:44

cardibach · 06/08/2026 11:36

Not with entirely invented cases it’s not.

It's well known that chatgpt makes up facts in academics

OP posts:
clearlyy · 06/08/2026 11:47

chat GPT isn’t a human. We are. That’s the biggest reason for me, I’d rather ask people than a robot.

Backedoffhackedoff · 06/08/2026 11:50

cardibach · 06/08/2026 11:36

Not with entirely invented cases it’s not.

But you’ve extrapolated that because lawyers or barristers have gone in front of a judge with invented cases (without checking) a lay person can’t use it for legal advice?

I'm in a group full of people going through a legal process. So many people represent themslevs with chat gpt. What risk do you think the fact that a barrister used a made up case in court presents to their case?

isthisaplum · 06/08/2026 11:50

Problem with MN is that if you post on any of the ‘big’ boards - AIBU, Parenting, Relationships et al - there is always a ‘bait the OP’ tendency. It isn’t all posters but it’s enough people that the thread can take on a hectoring sort of tone and become unnecessarily adversarial in its nature. So instead of ‘three year olds are often driven to control their environment’ you get a lot of ‘he’s THREE’ replies. Or, you get ‘parent him’ or something equally helpful.

politickie · 06/08/2026 11:52

I would always rather ask real people than an LLM. If I think MN is going to be too harsh about anything, then I’d go to other forums over something like ChatGPT.

KamikazePigeon · 06/08/2026 11:53

The latest version of ChatGPT at least tries to find nuance in most situations and gently pushes back against extremes. MN just stokes the fire sometimes, confidently taking a single incident as evidence of an entire relationship.

Look at what often happens here when someone's dh has said something a little clumsy that hurt their feelings. Cue the 'he's negging you, he's vile, he doesn't even like you, much less love you,' brigade. Then if the OP doesn't agree, it's, 'Where is your self respect? OMG, the bar is in hell. I couldn't stay with a man like that.'

Disturbia81 · 06/08/2026 11:54

No I love my meta, gives really good advice and makes me see both sides, and instantly too.

beAsensible1 · 06/08/2026 11:56

Well yes MN is from people and GPT is just an aggregate of Reddit posts squished together by a word prediction programme.

it’s like asking the Microsoft paperclip for medical advice

friedaklein · 06/08/2026 11:58

I think AIBU is often a bear pit, but had great advice over the years on other boards.

OnlyUsername · 06/08/2026 11:59

isthisaplum · 06/08/2026 11:50

Problem with MN is that if you post on any of the ‘big’ boards - AIBU, Parenting, Relationships et al - there is always a ‘bait the OP’ tendency. It isn’t all posters but it’s enough people that the thread can take on a hectoring sort of tone and become unnecessarily adversarial in its nature. So instead of ‘three year olds are often driven to control their environment’ you get a lot of ‘he’s THREE’ replies. Or, you get ‘parent him’ or something equally helpful.

Some people just want an outlet to say the (awful) stuff they think about people they encounter in their daily lives out loud.

ParsleySageToiletDuckAndBinBags · 06/08/2026 12:18

Spoiler alert for anybody reading: this thread was actually started by ChatGPT, and every single subsequent post is just ChatGPT responding to itself Grin

ParsleySageToiletDuckAndBinBags · 06/08/2026 12:21

beAsensible1 · 06/08/2026 11:56

Well yes MN is from people and GPT is just an aggregate of Reddit posts squished together by a word prediction programme.

it’s like asking the Microsoft paperclip for medical advice

And we all know about Clippy's eventual catastrophic fall from grace, don't we?

AIBU to think Mumsnet gives better advice than ChatGPT?
ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 12:22

Backedoffhackedoff · 06/08/2026 11:50

But you’ve extrapolated that because lawyers or barristers have gone in front of a judge with invented cases (without checking) a lay person can’t use it for legal advice?

I'm in a group full of people going through a legal process. So many people represent themslevs with chat gpt. What risk do you think the fact that a barrister used a made up case in court presents to their case?

Wow! Well because then everything is made up? Where is the fact checking?

OP posts:
Gwenhwyfar · 06/08/2026 12:24

MN in general, but the relationship advice is very biased, lots of LTB and the belief that people will be happy single or will easily pick someone else up. Also, sometimes there's a misunderstanding and the whole thread goes the wrong way because of that.

On the other hand, Chat GPT is based only on what you tell it, not real-life experience.

ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 12:25

ParsleySageToiletDuckAndBinBags · 06/08/2026 12:18

Spoiler alert for anybody reading: this thread was actually started by ChatGPT, and every single subsequent post is just ChatGPT responding to itself Grin

Ahaha! I am in my real user anyone can search me- been here years

In case any one wants to fact check!
@ParsleySageToiletDuckAndBinBags like your sense of humour!

OP posts:
ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 12:27

Gwenhwyfar · 06/08/2026 12:24

MN in general, but the relationship advice is very biased, lots of LTB and the belief that people will be happy single or will easily pick someone else up. Also, sometimes there's a misunderstanding and the whole thread goes the wrong way because of that.

On the other hand, Chat GPT is based only on what you tell it, not real-life experience.

It's also based and an consolidation of Internet posts, which includes public posts like mumsnet

OP posts:
Backedoffhackedoff · 06/08/2026 12:28

ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 12:22

Wow! Well because then everything is made up? Where is the fact checking?

Not everything is made up is it? We’re talking about a judgement, used to prove the precedent of a point of law, by a barrister, in front of a judge, in a court room, being made up.

what evidence do you have that chat GPt can’t provide people with solid legal advice, with the responsibility being on that person to check it’s accuracy themselves?

Backedoffhackedoff · 06/08/2026 12:30

ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 12:27

It's also based and an consolidation of Internet posts, which includes public posts like mumsnet

It won’t include Mumsnet, Mumsnet is too tiny. I’ve only ever seen Reddit cited as information. And that’s not people’s thoughts, it’s where similar questions have been asked and answered

ponyprincess · 06/08/2026 12:31

I am wondering how chatgpt will pick up the threads recently of classic/typical mumsnet phrases

How long till chatgpt is telling us to ltb? Eat naice ham?

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread