Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

DH stoping paying CMS

484 replies

donewiththistakemeaway · Today 10:25

My husband told his ex-partner — the mother of his two oldest children — a year ago that he planned to leave his job within the next 12 months. She has never worked, and for the last 9 years he has paid her £1,500 per month voluntarily, even though the Child Maintenance Service calculates the correct amount should only be around £300.

The kids stayed with us for 10 nights a month, matching my husband’s days off. Between us, we did all school runs, clubs, meals, and bedtime routines — returning them to their mother around 8pm each evening. They couldn’t stay more nights because my husband’s shift pattern meant leaving at 5pm, driving 2 hours, working until 7am, and getting home by 9am. This would have left me alone caring for all 5 children while also working, handling all household tasks, and managing their activities. Meanwhile, their mother only had to put them to bed around 9pm, yet received far more money than required. We also take all five children to their clubs and activities every weekend.

My husband has now left that job — he was exhausted, and after 12 years of hard work, my own business has become successful enough for me to be the main earner. He reminded his ex repeatedly over the year that this change was coming and that his income would no longer support those higher payments.

He explained that he is now available full-time: he can offer full custody, 50/50 shared care, or flexible arrangements — whatever works for the children. He will be there for school runs, sickness, doctors’ appointments, school events, and anything else they need. The only change is that he can no longer make those payments.

This has caused a huge reaction. She is angry, calling him names and saying she won’t be able to afford her home. He asked her to consider getting a job, or for her new partner to contribute financially ( he does not work either) but she has threatened to involve a solicitor — claiming that if my husband stops paying, I must cover the cost because I’m so flush.

I do not believe this is my responsibility. To keep things calm, I offered to pay the £500 per month which sis still more that what the CMS says is the correct amount, but this is still not enough for her. She won’t stop us seeing the children, as she only cares for them a few hours a day and enjoys having her evenings free with her partner.

My main worry is whether there is any legal loophole that would force my husband to keep paying that higher sum just to maintain her lifestyle?

OP posts:
LiquoriceAllsorts2 · Today 11:19

HermioneWeasley · Today 10:38

The kids haven’t stopped costing money just because he’s decided to give up his job - that’s not a luxury you have when you have kids. It’s not your responsibility it’s his (or 50% he shares with their mother). Depending on what happened before they split up, if they jointly agreed that she would give up work and reduce her earning potential to be the main parent then she simply isn’t as able to cover 50% of the costs due to joint decisions.

£300 a month for 2 kids when he’s only had them 10 nights a month is laughable - he’s not a prince for paying £1500 which is the bare minimum for 2 kids to have bedrooms, water, food etc.

10 nights is a third of the time and it sounds like they also have them for several hours on the other days aswell and provide them with their tea on those days. Sounds like he is contributing well.

Beamsss · Today 11:19

You're not responsible, but it's a shitty thing for a father to do. Just stop working with no plan to support his DC? Not a man I'd want to be married to.

Cannybeme · Today 11:19

CMS look at parental income. Not yours as a step-parent.

Sounds like ex has been sitting pretty on what your husband has been paying (taking into account how much the children are with you). Now that has been pulled from under her she’s pissed off!

Rosebud987 · Today 11:20

I’m a family solicitor. We don’t get involved in maintenance as a general rule. We advise you go to CMS so let her get a solicitor. The court can order maintenance but are loathed to and after 12 months CMS can override court orders for child maintenance. So let her crack on and she will be worse off as she will have to go to CMS and get her £300.

PurpleThistle7 · Today 11:21

MajorProcrastination · Today 11:18

Hang on, they're only with their mum for an hour then sleeping for 6 out of 7 days of the week? Does she do breakfast time with them?

Aside from where they're sleeping, the set up sounds like your household's doing the majority of childcare already anyway.

He's been paying £1,500 per month? I thought the recommended rates were closer to 15% of income with some amends depending on numbers of nights slept at the parent's home (which is wild in your case if you're doing EVERYTHING else). Unless he was earning £10k a month?!

And she's not worked even though she's not got children with her for the vast majority of the working day? That is WILD. Especially if I'm assuming the youngest is at least 9 years old.

My husband paid my step child's mum a set rate which was above the suggested 15% and he didn't change it when we had other children nor did he take off any deductions for the 2-3 nights a week she slept at ours and that was fine - he knew what was coming out each month, his child's mum knew what was coming in. All three of us worked, it's a very different situation to yours.

I do understand the shock from the other woman, she's got used to £18k a year coming in and she doesn't want to work (maybe she's not needed to with that level of income for just putting her own 2 kids to bed).

I'd recommend getting some proper legal advice as I get the impression that things could get very challenging.

The youngest is FOURTEEN!!

99bottlesofkombucha · Today 11:21

Stompythedinosaur · Today 11:01

It's not up to you to pay.

But I do think that a parent who optionally stops working without a care for the fact he is meant to be financially supporting his dc is a shitty dad.

And "tired from working for 12 years" is ridiculous. Most adults over the age of 30 have worked for 12 years, it's nothing to make a song and dance about.

Nah. I’m all for dad’s contributing, but why hasn’t she or her partner got a job? He gets to spend time with his dc, avoid burnout and she can work out how to manage life, it’s clear the op and her dh are not going to let his dc go without, they just won’t send money to the mum. She can get a job, the kids are not babies, and I don’t see why they should continue to be funded to not work.

Luckydog7 · Today 11:23

Again if DH is unemployed she wouldn't get spousal anyway even if they WERE married which they weren't.

Tbh OP. I think giving her anything is only going to delay the inevitable and make her more entitled. If you stop the handouts now they will be forced to sort their lives out and that best done sooner rather then later for everyone involved.

I would be concerned that by giving her money I would be setting a precedence. If you died and were paying her a monthly income she could claim on your estate as a dependent (laughable but people get stuck in litigation for years over less). Same is true of DH paying more then needed.

It sounds like she's a very uninvolved parent and the kids would be much more stable with you. Get that all sorted and the ex can get on with sorting her life out. She's had a lovely easy few years but it's time to crack on.

MajorProcrastination · Today 11:23

PurpleThistle7 · Today 11:21

The youngest is FOURTEEN!!

BLOOOODY HELLLS BELLS.

I have a 14 year old. You can defo work plenty with a 14 year old! She's not a SAHM at this point, she's just plain old unemployed. Jeeez.

Ubugly · Today 11:23

Whats her back up plan when the kids leave home? For your husband still to pay?
God forbid he died then what. She would have to get a job!

AnneLovesGilbert · Today 11:23

Beamsss · Today 11:19

You're not responsible, but it's a shitty thing for a father to do. Just stop working with no plan to support his DC? Not a man I'd want to be married to.

Shitty to have paid £1200 a month more than he was obliged to for 9 years? What must you think of the ex who’s never contributed a penny she’s earned to her children’s costs…

Dumbledora8 · Today 11:25

This woman is taking the piss!! She will be getting UC aswell. Your husband has afforded her not to work. Any posters who think is woman's behaviour is appropriate must be free loaders themselves

TealDoors · Today 11:25

Beamsss · Today 11:19

You're not responsible, but it's a shitty thing for a father to do. Just stop working with no plan to support his DC? Not a man I'd want to be married to.

The plan, which has been agreed with OP, is that her business supports them and pays for him to support her at home.

Why should the SC have to live somewhere they don’t want to, just to make their mum some money because she can’t be arsed to work?

TheJoyousHiker · Today 11:25

Beamsss · Today 11:19

You're not responsible, but it's a shitty thing for a father to do. Just stop working with no plan to support his DC? Not a man I'd want to be married to.

Have you actually read and understood what the OP has written?

donewiththistakemeaway · Today 11:25

MajorProcrastination · Today 11:18

Hang on, they're only with their mum for an hour then sleeping for 6 out of 7 days of the week? Does she do breakfast time with them?

Aside from where they're sleeping, the set up sounds like your household's doing the majority of childcare already anyway.

He's been paying £1,500 per month? I thought the recommended rates were closer to 15% of income with some amends depending on numbers of nights slept at the parent's home (which is wild in your case if you're doing EVERYTHING else). Unless he was earning £10k a month?!

And she's not worked even though she's not got children with her for the vast majority of the working day? That is WILD. Especially if I'm assuming the youngest is at least 9 years old.

My husband paid my step child's mum a set rate which was above the suggested 15% and he didn't change it when we had other children nor did he take off any deductions for the 2-3 nights a week she slept at ours and that was fine - he knew what was coming out each month, his child's mum knew what was coming in. All three of us worked, it's a very different situation to yours.

I do understand the shock from the other woman, she's got used to £18k a year coming in and she doesn't want to work (maybe she's not needed to with that level of income for just putting her own 2 kids to bed).

I'd recommend getting some proper legal advice as I get the impression that things could get very challenging.

Yeah so basically Monday - Sunday I have the kids until 8pm and then drop them back to their mums except for 10 nights a month when the kids stay over instead of being dropped back as my DH is home. But we do all clubs etc Monday-Sunday. She has the kids 8-9pm Monday - Sunday except on the 10 nights we have then she doesn’t see them at all and she does the school runs in the morning only except on the 10 nights a month where we do the school runs in the morning asleep as all school runs every day regardless if it’s our days or not

OP posts:
TealDoors · Today 11:26

MajorProcrastination · Today 11:23

BLOOOODY HELLLS BELLS.

I have a 14 year old. You can defo work plenty with a 14 year old! She's not a SAHM at this point, she's just plain old unemployed. Jeeez.

I wonder how much she and her unemployed partner have been raking in?

If she’s young enough, she’ll have another kid within a year.

thepariscrimefiles · Today 11:26

donewiththistakemeaway · Today 10:56

No reason other than she never had to. DH paid off the mortgage on the house she lives in when they were still together from inheritance from his family. It’s just the bills she needs to cover which I don’t know how much benefits she gets but that must help plus the CMS DH has paid over the years

So your DH gave his former family home, which is fully paid for due to his inheritance, to his ex-wife? That was extremely generous of him. His ex-wife is being ridiculous, lazy and greedy.

stargirl27 · Today 11:26

TealDoors · Today 11:18

It’s probably worth it to formalise the arrangement and ensure OP’s household gets any child benefit, etc, and also to stop the inevitable guilt tripping that the SC are about to get about how it’s their fault their mum is penniless…

I'm not sure since (a) I'd imagine ex will dispute those are the current arrangements and won't want them formalised given it will jeopardise her CM claim etc. and (b) any money received from child benefit will likely not be worth it given legal fees (if DH is represented) and also mental strain of court proceedings. I definitely wouldn't suggest DH issues proceedings at this stage.

I think the guilt tripping will likely take place regardless.

lemmein · Today 11:27

You obviously don’t have to pay & it seems she’s massively taken the piss until now but generally I think all family income should be included in cms assessments. Far too many men dodge paying maintenance by pretending the only household income is their wife’s. If his new step-children can be included as ‘relevant children’ to reduce his cms contributions then his new wife’s income should be included in the household income for assessment too.

I’m not saying that’s what your DH is doing and he sounds like a very hands on dad - but the system is very wrong.

gotmyselfintoapickle · Today 11:27

Beamsss · Today 11:19

You're not responsible, but it's a shitty thing for a father to do. Just stop working with no plan to support his DC? Not a man I'd want to be married to.

Regardless of what he's done until now (which is far more than he needed to). He is offering to have them 50% of the time or more, if the kids prefer. In which case he wouldn't owe anything even if he kept working.

BrownBookshelf · Today 11:27

Not sure some people have noticed that she got a year's warning of this. That's actually rather a lot, certainly enough to have sorted herself out with an NMW role unless there's something OPs not telling us.

He could've fallen under a bus at any point during the last 12 years, as we all could. There has never been any guarantee this income would continue.

Luckydog7 · Today 11:28

thepariscrimefiles · Today 11:26

So your DH gave his former family home, which is fully paid for due to his inheritance, to his ex-wife? That was extremely generous of him. His ex-wife is being ridiculous, lazy and greedy.

They weren't even married!!! DH has been extremely generous to his ex. It's time to stop.

IPM · Today 11:28

donewiththistakemeaway · Today 11:02

It’s too much 4 hours around trip every day for work. Back breaking work he does. Physically demanding. It’s his turn now to help me with all the kids and he can live a less physically demanding life and I have pressure relived off me so I have help with childcare and I can improve my career now. I’ve stood in the wings being the unpaid nanny while he made his money and while his ex did nothing and now it’s my turn to sort my life and my career and he can be there for the kids and his ex can get a job. Between his ex and her partner if they could get a part time job and make £500 a month each and I continue with the £500 then the ex would be no worse off

You'd think he might've considered how tough he was going to make his life when he chose to father 5 kids?

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · Today 11:28

Beamsss · Today 11:19

You're not responsible, but it's a shitty thing for a father to do. Just stop working with no plan to support his DC? Not a man I'd want to be married to.

Hoe is it shitty? He is providing for them by providing a roof over their head, meals, activities, whatever else they need for as many days of the month as they choice whilst also paying their mother, who is perfectly capable of working herself but chooses not to, more than he needs to do.

JuliaRobHurts · Today 11:29

HermioneWeasley · Today 10:38

The kids haven’t stopped costing money just because he’s decided to give up his job - that’s not a luxury you have when you have kids. It’s not your responsibility it’s his (or 50% he shares with their mother). Depending on what happened before they split up, if they jointly agreed that she would give up work and reduce her earning potential to be the main parent then she simply isn’t as able to cover 50% of the costs due to joint decisions.

£300 a month for 2 kids when he’s only had them 10 nights a month is laughable - he’s not a prince for paying £1500 which is the bare minimum for 2 kids to have bedrooms, water, food etc.

Fuck me are you so on the edge of being triggered that you just lose the ability to process the information infront of you? Just skim all the details of OP and see '£1500 a month when CPS only suggests £300' and then explode into a defensive fury? Are you by chance someone who hasn't worked for 9+ years, are relying solely on your ex payments and won't stop banging on about your earning potential having been hindered by your ex all them moons ago?

Larrythecatforpm · Today 11:29

Don’t give her a penny, your income isn’t taken into account and considering you have them 5 days out of 7 your both the main carers if anything you should be seeking child maintenance off her!