Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to accept my parents' £1m+ gift when my sister gets nothing

776 replies

ForEagerRobin · 23/06/2026 21:00

My parents have recently told me they want to gift me assets worth just over £1m while they're still alive. It's a mixture of investments, funds and cash.

The problem is they don't intend to give my sister anything.

My sister is absolutely furious and says I should refuse the money unless they split everything equally between us.
For context, we had a very happy childhood. Our parents were loving, supportive and provided us with every opportunity. There was no obvious favouritism.

As adults, however, our relationships with them have been very different. I see them every week, help them with shopping, appointments, paperwork and generally make sure they're OK. They're in their late 70s and increasingly need support.

My sister has never really made much effort. She can go months without seeing them. A recent example was when they needed a lift to the airport. She was free and lived closest but simply couldn't be bothered. Another relative ended up taking them.

My parents are very hurt by this and have told me repeatedly that their decision is based on years of feeling ignored by her.
The thing is, I don't actually feel responsible for their decision. It's their money. They're mentally capable, fully understand what they're doing and have made their views clear.

My sister says that may be true, but by accepting the money I'm endorsing their behaviour and choosing money over my relationship with her.

My response was that turning down £1m doesn't magically mean she gets it. It simply means none of us do.

She says a decent sister would refuse it on principle.

DH thinks that's easy to say when she's asking me to sacrifice something that could transform our children's futures.

So AIBU for thinking this isn't my decision to make, and that refusing the money out of "solidarity" would be completely irrational and stupid.

I care for my sister but she has thrown away her life by herself. We came from very good backgrounds with potential, she chose to waste that. I am now in my 40s, I live a very modest life, DH is an engineer, I work for civil service I’ve been in the civil service for almost 20 years so I have worked my way up. I am not a luxury type of person, DH and I share a car, it’s over 10 years old we bought it brand new XC90 it does the job very well, our children are at private school but it’s not eton it’s very affordable and does the job too. They’re doing very well at school, we go on 3 holidays a year, we invest for them each year we save from them a certain amount tax free and my parents top that for them. They do the same for my sisters children. My sister has no bothered to do anything for her children. All the savings they have is from our parents which is quite sad. What kind of parent has children when they can’t save for their futures. She has a new car all the time, lives wayy above her means yet nothing to show for it just new things all the time. Conspicuous consumption. She is pushing 50 and has wasted her potential now wants to cry to me. We are both oxbridge educated, went to very good private schools, the world was our oyster.

OP posts:
Oliveoy · 24/06/2026 16:24

ForEagerRobin · 24/06/2026 16:21

yeah I am

Is it under the shade of a bridge?

ForEagerRobin · 24/06/2026 16:27

ThatCyanCat · 24/06/2026 16:23

Then there's really no excuse for all the inconsistencies.

Fair enough

OP posts:
MyIcyHeart · 24/06/2026 16:35

Oliveoy · 24/06/2026 16:24

Is it under the shade of a bridge?

😂😂😂 best response on this post, thus far!

randomnamegenerated · 24/06/2026 16:36

ThatCyanCat · 24/06/2026 16:23

Then there's really no excuse for all the inconsistencies.

I can think of two. 1. Crafting posts to elicit a predetermined desired response or, 2. Making it all up as you go.

Interestingly, I've also never come across anyone in the UK who said they studied mathematics unless they were 90. It's pretty universally, I did a maths degree, or, I did maths at university, and they usually specify which Bridge. Or is it which Ox?

ForEagerRobin · 24/06/2026 16:41

randomnamegenerated · 24/06/2026 16:36

I can think of two. 1. Crafting posts to elicit a predetermined desired response or, 2. Making it all up as you go.

Interestingly, I've also never come across anyone in the UK who said they studied mathematics unless they were 90. It's pretty universally, I did a maths degree, or, I did maths at university, and they usually specify which Bridge. Or is it which Ox?

You don’t have to engage with the post if you disagree it’s not a requirement of forced upon anyone.

If I put mathematics everyone would go on about how it’s mathematics. On my certificate it does say mathematics. I said Oxbridge because I didn’t really want to share my college do I have to share that. I was too think for Oxbridge anyway it was easier to get in I had fun and still close with my friendship group we met up very often we all agree we were to thick to be there and wouldn’t get in now.

OP posts:
SerenaCat93 · 24/06/2026 16:47

Oliveoy · 24/06/2026 16:20

Hard disagree.

I'm talking about supporting a child academically and culturally throughout their childhood, with the aim that they will grow into a well rounded, capable, confident, independent individual who therefore has a better chance of providing for themselves. They can buy their own car, because instead of save save saving for their house deposit, the money was spent to equip them to succeed academically and in the workplace.

Of course those things are important. But reaching adulthood without a penny to your name, and lacking transport to widen your employment opportunities severely limits young adults achievement regardless of how wonderful they are.

My best friend graduated from the same degree as me with the same grades as me but she couldn't learn to drive because she had no money and no job and her parents had nothing to give her. I bought a cheap car and driving lessons with the money my family had saved for me upon reaching adulthood. I got a better job, quicker than her, not because I'm better than her but because I had access to a 50 mile radius while she had access to a 10 mile radius and couldn't get anywhere before 9 am. So I got ahead. Two years later I had more experience than her is more roles than her because of my car giving me that freedom. She was still struggling to save enough money from working the only jobs available to her in her in a 10 mile radius and couldn't even think about moving because she couldn't afford rent without giving up on driving altogether. Two years after that I bought my first house using a springboard mortgage because my grandparents had the money to lend me (they got it back at the end of the 3 year spring board). My best friend had abandoned driving and moved to where the jobs were, now all her money goes on rent so she can't save to buy a car or driving lessons. Fast forward to now (32) I'm married, have a big beautiful house and two children, a nest egg building for each child and a healthy savings account. My best friend is still renting, can't save a deposit and still can't afford driving lessons which are now nearly £80 a lesson in our area. She's brilliant, she's incredibly intelligent, she has a masters, she's cultured, she's everything I ever wanted to be and outshines me in many ways, BUT, she just never launched, because she wasn't given any money to launch with and starting a whole life of a car, a licence to drive it with, a deposit to buy a house etc from £0 is nigh on impossible in today's climate. All the culture and intelligence she has got her nowhere in terms of setting up an adult life because for that you need MONEY. I have several brilliant, intelligent, cultured friends in the same situation, some are even colleagues doing the same job as me for the same pay! Yet I am a decade ahead in my financial security and earning power and the only difference between us is i was given a car and lent a house deposit.

Young adults need financial help to get going. Without it they will always be a decade behind their peers. Sacrificing that for holidays when you were able to give them the best egg but chose not too is fucking irresponsible.

"Oh look darling! We gave you all the childhood experiences and tutoring so that you're a marvellous adult able to get any job or achievement on the world! As long as it's free and less than 10 miles away! Look at the uni course you got accepted onto but can't afford to attend or that brilliant job 15 miles away that you can't get to on time! Didn't we do a great job!" 🙄

If you have all that money to spend on your kids right now and don't save any of it, you are letting them and irresponsible. They could go on half the holidays, do half the after school activities, half the time with the tutor and still being well rounded with a nest egg to launch them into their adult life at the end of it. Anyone who says they can afford multiple holidays a year, multiple hobbies and a tutor but can't afford to save anything for their kids future is just financially irresponsible.

randomnamegenerated · 24/06/2026 17:06

ForEagerRobin · 24/06/2026 16:41

You don’t have to engage with the post if you disagree it’s not a requirement of forced upon anyone.

If I put mathematics everyone would go on about how it’s mathematics. On my certificate it does say mathematics. I said Oxbridge because I didn’t really want to share my college do I have to share that. I was too think for Oxbridge anyway it was easier to get in I had fun and still close with my friendship group we met up very often we all agree we were to thick to be there and wouldn’t get in now.

No one's required to do anything here? You don't even have to reply to my posts. My own opinion is that you are getting a very low effort grade on this thread. Your response to my question about why you stated both that your sister lived closer to your parents and that you lived closer to them was a C+ at best.

Not asking you to share anything you don't want (although you have shared quite a lot about your sister's life, to be fair) but do you mean your university or your college?

I know quite a few people who went to both Bridges around the same time as you, assuming based on the rough ages of your children, you're around 40ish, and none of them are thick. Most of them, I suspect, would get in now. Acceptance rates are lower than they were in, say, 2000, but it was hardly a cakewalk. You must have had to both answer the 'why do you want to study maths' question and take either the MAT or STEP exam, so you couldn't have been all that 'thick'?

Oliveoy · 24/06/2026 17:08

SerenaCat93 · 24/06/2026 16:47

Of course those things are important. But reaching adulthood without a penny to your name, and lacking transport to widen your employment opportunities severely limits young adults achievement regardless of how wonderful they are.

My best friend graduated from the same degree as me with the same grades as me but she couldn't learn to drive because she had no money and no job and her parents had nothing to give her. I bought a cheap car and driving lessons with the money my family had saved for me upon reaching adulthood. I got a better job, quicker than her, not because I'm better than her but because I had access to a 50 mile radius while she had access to a 10 mile radius and couldn't get anywhere before 9 am. So I got ahead. Two years later I had more experience than her is more roles than her because of my car giving me that freedom. She was still struggling to save enough money from working the only jobs available to her in her in a 10 mile radius and couldn't even think about moving because she couldn't afford rent without giving up on driving altogether. Two years after that I bought my first house using a springboard mortgage because my grandparents had the money to lend me (they got it back at the end of the 3 year spring board). My best friend had abandoned driving and moved to where the jobs were, now all her money goes on rent so she can't save to buy a car or driving lessons. Fast forward to now (32) I'm married, have a big beautiful house and two children, a nest egg building for each child and a healthy savings account. My best friend is still renting, can't save a deposit and still can't afford driving lessons which are now nearly £80 a lesson in our area. She's brilliant, she's incredibly intelligent, she has a masters, she's cultured, she's everything I ever wanted to be and outshines me in many ways, BUT, she just never launched, because she wasn't given any money to launch with and starting a whole life of a car, a licence to drive it with, a deposit to buy a house etc from £0 is nigh on impossible in today's climate. All the culture and intelligence she has got her nowhere in terms of setting up an adult life because for that you need MONEY. I have several brilliant, intelligent, cultured friends in the same situation, some are even colleagues doing the same job as me for the same pay! Yet I am a decade ahead in my financial security and earning power and the only difference between us is i was given a car and lent a house deposit.

Young adults need financial help to get going. Without it they will always be a decade behind their peers. Sacrificing that for holidays when you were able to give them the best egg but chose not too is fucking irresponsible.

"Oh look darling! We gave you all the childhood experiences and tutoring so that you're a marvellous adult able to get any job or achievement on the world! As long as it's free and less than 10 miles away! Look at the uni course you got accepted onto but can't afford to attend or that brilliant job 15 miles away that you can't get to on time! Didn't we do a great job!" 🙄

If you have all that money to spend on your kids right now and don't save any of it, you are letting them and irresponsible. They could go on half the holidays, do half the after school activities, half the time with the tutor and still being well rounded with a nest egg to launch them into their adult life at the end of it. Anyone who says they can afford multiple holidays a year, multiple hobbies and a tutor but can't afford to save anything for their kids future is just financially irresponsible.

Seeings as you gave such a detailed anecdote, I'd be interested in this. Was your childhood devoid of holidays, hobbies and anything else that might cost money, so that your parents could save to "launch" you? Or, did you have all that too, because they were comfortable enough to both spend and save? And were they comfortable because your grandparents launched them, making you a product of generational privilege?

Obviously the benefits of financially supporting an adult child are undeniable and in an ideal world, everybody would have the means to do it.

But this discussion is off the back of the OP saying that if you cannot save for a child's future then you shouldn't have children. Which is an abhorrent viewpoint.

lightseeker · 24/06/2026 17:19

OP, you are 100% entitled to use whatever schools you wish for your children. This is not an issue. I have kids in independent schools myself. But I would never talk about it in the way you do in a public forum. I'm sorry but it's tone deaf and a bit crass, it really is. You must be able to see that.

Also, of course most people don't get given significant sums of money when they turn 25 or whatever. Are you on a wind-up here because I'm starting to wonder. Do you ever look around you at people on the streets?

Naunet · 24/06/2026 17:23

I think you parents behaviour is absolutely disgusting and I can see why your sister has distanced herself from them.

lightseeker · 24/06/2026 17:25

Also, is it the case that your parents paid for the education of your sister's kids, but not yours?

It sounds as if they are now young adults and yours are both still in prep school? Is this right?

If so, the money your DF is giving you now just equates to the money he gave her for her kids education over the years. In which case - no drama needed surely?

arminius · 24/06/2026 17:28

I wonder if your sister is rebelling against all the ‘perfection’. You say that your father had a perfect upbringing/family. I’m sure he’s tried to replicate that for you and your sister. You yourself seem to have pretty outlandish ideas about what is and isn’t acceptable, linked to your upbringing no doubt. If I had been brought up in this environment I may well have become someone determined to rebel too.

EasternStandard · 24/06/2026 17:32

arminius · 24/06/2026 17:28

I wonder if your sister is rebelling against all the ‘perfection’. You say that your father had a perfect upbringing/family. I’m sure he’s tried to replicate that for you and your sister. You yourself seem to have pretty outlandish ideas about what is and isn’t acceptable, linked to your upbringing no doubt. If I had been brought up in this environment I may well have become someone determined to rebel too.

It’s a bit reinforcing if the family around you see you as lacking it’s going to mess you up further.

Never do this though with money.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 24/06/2026 17:39

YANBU to take it at all. Your parents are offering it to you and it’s not your business if they offer to your sister as well.

However I think you are overly judgmental of your sister. If she is short on money or savings that’s not your problem but equally it’s not your business to judge.

Your parents do sound as thought they are being overly transactional and the way they are equating love and care with money doesn’t sit right with me: as though your sister is being punished for not towing the line.

The whole family sound weirdly money focussed tbh. albeit you’re all expressing it differently.

SerenaCat93 · 24/06/2026 17:51

Oliveoy · 24/06/2026 17:08

Seeings as you gave such a detailed anecdote, I'd be interested in this. Was your childhood devoid of holidays, hobbies and anything else that might cost money, so that your parents could save to "launch" you? Or, did you have all that too, because they were comfortable enough to both spend and save? And were they comfortable because your grandparents launched them, making you a product of generational privilege?

Obviously the benefits of financially supporting an adult child are undeniable and in an ideal world, everybody would have the means to do it.

But this discussion is off the back of the OP saying that if you cannot save for a child's future then you shouldn't have children. Which is an abhorrent viewpoint.

No. I am not the product of multi generational privilege. My mum had me at 21 and raised me on her own in a council flat. My grandparents were working class and had no money to launch her so she continued to live on poverty with a young child and no means of improving her lot. She didn't want that for me. She got her degree while I was in primary school, worked her ass of to buy a small cheap house (we live in an industrial town in the Midlands, it's cheap but there aren't many good employment opportunities, you have to commute to Birmingham for those which is impossible without transport). Whilst living in this cheap house we only had holidays every three years and I had two hobbies, brownies (cheap but fantastic) and dancing. She always told me it was important to save for the future and not spend everything we have now (basic financial knowledge) so while we had some money we could spend on going on better holidays and fun days out it was better to save it. My grandparents paid for a tutor once a week for a year and I got into grammar school which was free so my education was of good quality without costing money. I went to uni and when I graduated was given a small cheap car and enough money for lessons which opened employment opportunities in Birmingham up to me. When my grandparents reached retirement age a few years later they got their lump sum from their private pension which they couldn't afford to give to me but could afford to lend (springboard mortgage). I started accumulating equity from there and was able to buy a big family home 10 years later from those gains whilst my non nest egg graduate friends were buying their first homes on 30 year mortgages, I doubt they will ever be able to afford a big family home. It's not right and it pisses me off but that's how our economy is. The money my grandparents were able to lend me only came about from them retiring so they couldn't afford to launch my mum into adulthood which is why she was poor for so long. She made it in the end but she has far less than me in assets despite earning more than me now because as I said, when you start from scratch you never catch up (compound interest etc.)

What my mum and grandparents achieved for me from their poor background was nothing short of herculean. It's incredible and the experiences of each generation combined show that it's far more beneficial to give enough money to produce a well rounded child whilst holding some back to launch them into adulthood rather than spending it all now and producing a wonder child with no money to launch them into their adult lives. They inspire me with their industriousness. It's similar to the drive seen in immigrants who arrived dirt poor and get all of their kids into top unis and buy massive houses. It's why I save aggressively for my children and only go on holiday once every three years instead of every year and limit them to two (cheap) hobbies each to do so. If they wanted an expensive hobby they could do so but it would only be one not two and they know that. So many enriching activities are cheap or free, I would never spend a fortune on them to the detriment of my children's future.

I maintain that if parents have enough money for multiple holidays, several hobbies and a regular tutor and are spaffing all that money on the here and now and saving nothing for their childrens future, they are irresponsible. And teaching their kids bad money management actually.

If people have children without being able to afford any of those things in the first place and it's not an either or situation with saving, just none of it can happen then of course that is the cycle of intergenerational poverty repeating itself which is an entirely different situation from the ridiculous scenario you put to me where people wealthy enough to have all of those things don't understand the importance of saving.

user1467306011 · 24/06/2026 17:51

ilbehonest · 23/06/2026 21:10

Your parents are horrid. If they really didn't want your sister to inherit they could skip you and her and gift equally to the grand children. Your sister may be selfish but you and your parents are actually quite spiteful IMO.

Makes me wonder why the Sister doesn't help out her Parents. I am wondering if she has always been made to feel that Op is the favourite daughter and she is just a disappointment. Some Parents are horrible people.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 24/06/2026 17:56

lightseeker · 24/06/2026 17:25

Also, is it the case that your parents paid for the education of your sister's kids, but not yours?

It sounds as if they are now young adults and yours are both still in prep school? Is this right?

If so, the money your DF is giving you now just equates to the money he gave her for her kids education over the years. In which case - no drama needed surely?

OP said they're paying for their own kids' education themselves, so what with the £100,000 the sister's also had, plus whatever other help over the years, you're probably not far wrong about the difference not being all that huge

ForEagerRobin · 24/06/2026 17:59

randomnamegenerated · 24/06/2026 17:06

No one's required to do anything here? You don't even have to reply to my posts. My own opinion is that you are getting a very low effort grade on this thread. Your response to my question about why you stated both that your sister lived closer to your parents and that you lived closer to them was a C+ at best.

Not asking you to share anything you don't want (although you have shared quite a lot about your sister's life, to be fair) but do you mean your university or your college?

I know quite a few people who went to both Bridges around the same time as you, assuming based on the rough ages of your children, you're around 40ish, and none of them are thick. Most of them, I suspect, would get in now. Acceptance rates are lower than they were in, say, 2000, but it was hardly a cakewalk. You must have had to both answer the 'why do you want to study maths' question and take either the MAT or STEP exam, so you couldn't have been all that 'thick'?

Fair point and no one is forced to reply here. Honestly if my responses about my situation look messy it's just because I’m typing quickly between dealing with real life no major mystery or trying to evade the question.

I meant my college. You belong to the central university for things like big lectures and exams, but my day to day academic life and social life was based around my college. I picked my college based on all the wrong reasons but it was fun I met my closest friends there and wouldn’t change my experience.

You’re probably right about the mutual friends, too. The independent school circuit near me back then was somewhat connected. Everyone knew everyone, or at least knew of them and that definitely carried over into uni. We very well could have even played sports against each other back in the day.

But I still stand by my own self-assessment of my own intelligence. I went to university because it was what was expected of me, I’d much rather have been dilly dallying at home with my first boyfriend. University wasn’t a big achievement in my family, everybody went to university there was no question about it and I certainly did not have the guts to tell my father I’m not interested in university so I studied what I knew I was okay at and could bare. I had multiple run ins with my tutor about my ‘ambition’ or lack of. I did not choose to attend university that is just what you do as my father puts it. My personal statement was pretty rubbish my answer to why I wanted to study maths was pretty rubbish too. Many people have said I probably got in because of my school maybe so. Looking at how brutal the competition is today. My cousins children have all attended variations of Oxbridge, Durham, St Andrews none of them wanted to go to university but again they were told to it’s just what you. I remember my father telling me as I was upset about applying to university and having to dealing more years of studying it’s only a few years of your life and you’re out you can do whatever you want I’ll never ask you to do anything again’ I hated education but I enjoyed the atmosphere at my school, I was very social and I loved sports and was good at sports and going to parties without any of that I probably wouldn’t have attended university. I'm totally fine with anyone calling me thick

OP posts:
KitchenColourandstyle · 24/06/2026 18:05

user1467306011 · 24/06/2026 17:51

Makes me wonder why the Sister doesn't help out her Parents. I am wondering if she has always been made to feel that Op is the favourite daughter and she is just a disappointment. Some Parents are horrible people.

In a world in which the OP feels her top 5% of the country lifestyle is modest and that she is 'poor' compared to others in her family I think it's almost certain that her sister feels she isn't good enough, that she has failed and if she has to listen to pronouncements about not having children if you can't send them to private school, set them up with an investment portfolio and hand over an enormous wedge of cash when they are 25 then she probably feels she a massive let down. I bet she's heard if you could be more like EagerRobin too many times.

MandemChickenShop · 24/06/2026 18:08

this is a load of yap.

ForEagerRobin · 24/06/2026 18:10

KitchenColourandstyle · 24/06/2026 18:05

In a world in which the OP feels her top 5% of the country lifestyle is modest and that she is 'poor' compared to others in her family I think it's almost certain that her sister feels she isn't good enough, that she has failed and if she has to listen to pronouncements about not having children if you can't send them to private school, set them up with an investment portfolio and hand over an enormous wedge of cash when they are 25 then she probably feels she a massive let down. I bet she's heard if you could be more like EagerRobin too many times.

Product of my own environment. Within our family we are the poor ones that’s a given I’m not upset about being poor according to their standards. I guess I look at myself in comparison to people around me not people that I do not know. I know we are very privileged that was an ignorant take.

OP posts:
ForEagerRobin · 24/06/2026 18:13

Puzzledandpissedoff · 24/06/2026 17:56

OP said they're paying for their own kids' education themselves, so what with the £100,000 the sister's also had, plus whatever other help over the years, you're probably not far wrong about the difference not being all that huge

Edited

My sister has needed assistance I have not asked money from my father it quite a long time. The only money he has given me has been towards my children’s JISAs to which he calls in and tops up himself and I get a notification when he’s topped them up and I’m the one that invests that money into funds and equities for them.

We pay the fees as we currently. The amount my parents have paid my nephews and nieces fees from prep school all the way to university probably adds up to the amount he wants to give me. The difference is that was all in cash this money he wants to gift is also within investments.

OP posts:
lightseeker · 24/06/2026 18:15

So basically then, he's not giving you anything he's not already given to her? He is equalising the discrepancy?

randomnamegenerated · 24/06/2026 18:16

ForEagerRobin · 24/06/2026 17:59

Fair point and no one is forced to reply here. Honestly if my responses about my situation look messy it's just because I’m typing quickly between dealing with real life no major mystery or trying to evade the question.

I meant my college. You belong to the central university for things like big lectures and exams, but my day to day academic life and social life was based around my college. I picked my college based on all the wrong reasons but it was fun I met my closest friends there and wouldn’t change my experience.

You’re probably right about the mutual friends, too. The independent school circuit near me back then was somewhat connected. Everyone knew everyone, or at least knew of them and that definitely carried over into uni. We very well could have even played sports against each other back in the day.

But I still stand by my own self-assessment of my own intelligence. I went to university because it was what was expected of me, I’d much rather have been dilly dallying at home with my first boyfriend. University wasn’t a big achievement in my family, everybody went to university there was no question about it and I certainly did not have the guts to tell my father I’m not interested in university so I studied what I knew I was okay at and could bare. I had multiple run ins with my tutor about my ‘ambition’ or lack of. I did not choose to attend university that is just what you do as my father puts it. My personal statement was pretty rubbish my answer to why I wanted to study maths was pretty rubbish too. Many people have said I probably got in because of my school maybe so. Looking at how brutal the competition is today. My cousins children have all attended variations of Oxbridge, Durham, St Andrews none of them wanted to go to university but again they were told to it’s just what you. I remember my father telling me as I was upset about applying to university and having to dealing more years of studying it’s only a few years of your life and you’re out you can do whatever you want I’ll never ask you to do anything again’ I hated education but I enjoyed the atmosphere at my school, I was very social and I loved sports and was good at sports and going to parties without any of that I probably wouldn’t have attended university. I'm totally fine with anyone calling me thick

Sigh. I've almost never come across someone with as much capability of missing the point as you.

You said:

I said Oxbridge because I didn’t really want to share my college do I have to share that.

I said:

Not asking you to share anything you don't want (although you have shared quite a lot about your sister's life, to be fair) but do you mean your university or your college?

Simple question. Main point: you said Oxbridge. My question implied, Cambridge or Oxford? Since most people specify. You replied with an incredibly long post with endless digressions about your background and your cousins as if that was even slightly germane to the question.

I meant my college. You belong to the central university for things like big lectures and exams

Yeah, I know. That was my point (see above).

I’d much rather have been dilly dallying at home with my first boyfriend.

Since you've been with your husband since you were 18, that couldn't have lasted long...

Adding the subtext, since you seem to not pick it up: I don't believe you.

HollywoodStarr · 24/06/2026 18:16

NeedyLimeMember · 23/06/2026 21:10

I think it was 3 holidays a year... But the private school is 'very affordable' 😆

Absolutely no clue on what modest means! FML! Three holidays a year… do me a favour.

Swipe left for the next trending thread