Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Burnham has won. More turmoil?

689 replies

KatiePricesKnickers · Yesterday 05:51

Now Burnham has won, it will trigger a leadership contest, and if he wins, a new chancellor of the exchequer.

Surely this cannot be good for the country, or its finances?

YABU - Burnham is a true leader who will improve the UK for everyone and be a competent and respected leader.

YANBU - FFS, here we go again.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
TheOliveWriter · Yesterday 07:04

Wishing14 · Yesterday 06:41

It’s good as the right will realise their mistake and hopefully by the time of the next election there will be more cohesion and Labour will be gone. Although the layabouts with their cushy 9-5 public sector jobs and pensions or even cushier benefits will continue to vote for them regardless!! The rest of us need to really come together. I believe it should be about encouraging and incentivising work, you should subsidise those who need it, but not keep them ‘better off’ through no hard work and progression which is good for no one (apart from Labour itself of course, and also increasingly the Greens).

Which public sector layabouts do you have in mind, the ones who empty your bins, or who teach your children, or those who try and support vulnerable older people to remain independent in their own homes or with insufficient funds to do so?

Sl0wS3as0n · Yesterday 07:04

Lugol · Yesterday 07:00

Quite why anyone even believes that the Government are running things anyway baffles me.

They are owned and run by the banks who run and own us.
They don't stop the energy companies from fucking us over, don't protect us from any of the onslaught of men pouring into our country to rinse it and have fucked over the youth by making them unemployable.

They have fucked small business by making it so ridiculously expensive to employ people so businesses are being forced to shed staff to keep going.

They spin everyone into a frenzy dividing us all while screwing us over removing our freedoms yet are toothless when girls are raped and men are stabbed.

This country is bankrupt and so is the rest of Europe.
If people think Andy Burnham is the answer when all this is, is another fucking male popularity contest and more smoke and mirrors to distract everyone while they push through digital ID.

In France when electricity and gas became cheaper they immediately passed the savings onto the population, reducing energy costs in the evenings by 60% and when the fuel prices came down last week they insisted the savings were immediately passed onto the population so they could pay less.

In the UK we are paying so much more and getting so much less.

People here are far too concerned with Palestine etc and not concerned enough with making the Government sort this country out.
Anyone who does is labelled as far right to shut them down.

We should ALL be taking to the streets to protest the state of this place but unless people can virtue signal about a country on the other side of the world they aren't interested.

We are all being played.

Andy Burnham won't change shit. This country is bankrupt.

It wasn’t Labour who caused the UK to lose 6% of its economy via Brexit.

LBFseBrom · Yesterday 07:05

Let's wait and see, he is not PM yet and a lot can happen.

I hope if he does become prime minister he will be given more of a chance than Starmer. The minute Starmer arrived the media was out to get him, they were relentless. So much personal hate generated towards him which is really not fair.

Evaka · Yesterday 07:06

I like Burnham but prefer stability. Leaving the EU has ironically turned the UK into Italy in the 80s.

GoneWithTHeWindJammers · Yesterday 07:07

Where did Count Binface come? Did he beat the Tory?

EdithBond · Yesterday 07:08

NetZeroZealot · Yesterday 06:50

Starmer isn’t a proponent of trickledown economics either.

Thats always been a Tory policy.

‘Build, baby, build’ approach to solving exorbitant rents?

the80sweregreat · Yesterday 07:09

What will a new PM do about so many things that are wrong with this country? I wished I knew, the Tories did that and nothing much changed. Best one they had was Rishi sunak and they hung him out to dry and I say that as someone who isn’t a conservative voter.
This split in the LP and in fighting is more akin to how the conservatives were for years. A new leader needs to unite people and I can’t see AB doing that.

Superhansrantowindsor · Yesterday 07:10

When I look at the cabinet I think about what a really difficult and important job they have , yet our political system means you can get one of these jobs with very little or no experience. The same is true with PM. Starmer is obviously intelligent but how much political experience does he actually have when you consider he has the most important job in the country? Same with Philipson. In charge of the countries education system with what qualifications? At least Burnham has his mayoral experience. I’m trying to be optimistic.

EdithBond · Yesterday 07:11

TheOliveWriter · Yesterday 07:04

Which public sector layabouts do you have in mind, the ones who empty your bins, or who teach your children, or those who try and support vulnerable older people to remain independent in their own homes or with insufficient funds to do so?

Or perhaps all these 9-5 junior doctors and nurses who’ll save their life when they get rushed to A&E?

Dragonscaledaisy · Yesterday 07:11

cloudtreecarpet · Yesterday 06:58

Honestly some people just spout utter nonsense like this with no evidence to back it up
Could be a Daily Mail journalist, their articles are like this - just overblown vitriol and grandiose statements with no real truth behind them.
The Daily Mail started the idea that Starmer is the "least popular PM ever" by just saying it over and over again.

Why do you assume that anyone who criticises Labour is a journalist? I'm actually a doctor and business owner but do feel free to carry on throwing insults around. I'm quite happy sitting back and watching the Labour party implode.

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 07:13

keepswimming38 · Yesterday 05:57

This is driven by Burnhams ego. I’m really sick of this male machismo shite.

I agree. I cannot stand the smug look on his face.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · Yesterday 07:13

Pinkandpurplehearts · Yesterday 06:37

If by ‘the rich’ you’re including those working long hours in stressful and difficult jobs to earn a good salary, then yes, it is economically selfish (and greedy!) to think you can help yourself to more of their earned income. It’s their money! What makes you think you’re entitled to it? Go and earn more yourself….

What makes you think that people who believe in higher taxes aren't already higher earners?

If you are unable to even imagine that some people might vote against their own self interest because they want a fairer society, then doesn't that make you the economically selfish one?

Iwantaircon · Yesterday 07:14

I like both of them. I’d rather starmer stayed , I think he’s decent and steady, and then Burnham lead labour at the next election.

Tana433 · Yesterday 07:15

I feel hopeful for the first time in a long time. For years during a Conservative government i was saying 'We need to get Keir Starmer in and give him a chance to turn things around' but unfortunately he has been a massive dissappointment. I feel with Andy Burnham in charge (i realise this is not yet a given) we have real hope of a better country otherwise inevitably Reform will get in next time and i dread to think what will happen to the UK then.

Tickingcrocodile · Yesterday 07:15

I can't actually see what Starmer has done that makes everyone dislike him so much. The country is in a dire state due to multiple factors from the past (never really recovered from the financial crisis of 2008 and the appalling Austerity politics, Brevity, covid) and global issues. Many other countries are facing the same problems as us in terms of expensive housing, poor wage inflation etc. There is no easy fix to it all.

If the Labour Party really wants Burnham to take over then I think the best way would be for Burnham to work alongside Starmer for a year or so and then have a managed handover.

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 07:15

LBFseBrom · Yesterday 07:05

Let's wait and see, he is not PM yet and a lot can happen.

I hope if he does become prime minister he will be given more of a chance than Starmer. The minute Starmer arrived the media was out to get him, they were relentless. So much personal hate generated towards him which is really not fair.

That's what being PM is all about - accountability. Anybody, no matter what party they support should want that. He talked a good fight but hasn't delivered.

Iwantaircon · Yesterday 07:15

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · Yesterday 07:13

What makes you think that people who believe in higher taxes aren't already higher earners?

If you are unable to even imagine that some people might vote against their own self interest because they want a fairer society, then doesn't that make you the economically selfish one?

Indeed.

KateSixer · Yesterday 07:15

He has a lot to prove.

So far he is showing all the signs of just being another twist in the wind politician with no strong personal convictions.

The number of times he's changed his view on something in the course of the by election campaign is evidence of this.

I think he is just going to tax more, spend more on benefits, fail to secure our defence and law and order and pander to his left wing ideology driven buddies in matters of employment and education.

Thus leading the nation further into decline.

I genuinely hope I am wrong but I see zero evidence.

Savvysix1984 · Yesterday 07:17

Glad Burnham won. I’ve thought for years that he’s the best person for PM job as he reflects labour values.
also glad reform got beat!

Twiglets1 · Yesterday 07:18

I think if Reform are to have any chance of winning a GE they need to find better candidates than the one from Makerfield with horrible comments about women buried in his social media just waiting to be uncovered by the media. A lesson for Farage.

Women are 50% of the electorate, at least.

I wanted Burnham to win as he seemed the best of a bad bunch. But I don’t really think he can do a better job as prime minister than Starmer so it’s all a big waste of money really. Personally I would rather see Streeting in charge but Burnham seems more popular amongst those eligible to vote for PM.

Swiss177 · Yesterday 07:18

DreadedInn · Yesterday 06:23

Or I am happy to subsidise others who I believe need it.

That doesn’t explain the vote share though as fewer than 20% of the population pay more tax than they receive back in either benefits or value of services.

You need to be earning well over 50k as a childless individual to not be a burden on the state and over 100k if you have children.

That can be the only reason for the vote. The vast majority are voting for an ever dwindling minority to subsidise them. We are a welfare state with an economy tagged on to it. It won’t end well.

BadBadCat · Yesterday 07:18

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 05:59

Can't say I'm enthusiastic about the Labour Party electing yet another white male leader.

Well who else have they got?

Dragonscaledaisy · Yesterday 07:19

BadBadCat · Yesterday 07:18

Well who else have they got?

Angela Rayner obviously.

Swiss177 · Yesterday 07:19

Savvysix1984 · Yesterday 07:17

Glad Burnham won. I’ve thought for years that he’s the best person for PM job as he reflects labour values.
also glad reform got beat!

Why do you not want people to better themselves and have some personal responsibility? It’s no wonder the country is in a mess. People thrive on being dependent on the state. It has to end.

Settlersa · Yesterday 07:19

I hope we don’t have a sad face life story every time he takes to the podium about his father’s job and how he was brought up in a hovel. It gets a bit wearing