Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Burnham has won. More turmoil?

689 replies

KatiePricesKnickers · Yesterday 05:51

Now Burnham has won, it will trigger a leadership contest, and if he wins, a new chancellor of the exchequer.

Surely this cannot be good for the country, or its finances?

YABU - Burnham is a true leader who will improve the UK for everyone and be a competent and respected leader.

YANBU - FFS, here we go again.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 07:31

Endgames · Yesterday 07:27

Hoping to see KS, RR and BP resign, it is labour’s
last chance, even given circumstances they’ve shown no ability to connect to people.

It will be a massive relief to get rid of Reeves but not if she's replaced by Milliband. Another ego, whose sole interests lie in his own pet projects.

Twiglets1 · Yesterday 07:31

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 07:25

I quite like Streeting and thought he did a reasonably good job as Health sec. He's also more to the right of Burnham but would bring a more centric approach that I think Labour need. Socialist Burnham isn't the answer. He's going to sink us further with giving trade unions what they want. It's going to be a period of more misery on middle income earners until Burnham is inevitably ousted. I want to see what he will do with the defence budget.

Agree Streeting did a decent job as health secretary and would bring a more centrist approach to Labour.

He could do for Labour what Kemi is doing for Conservatives - appeal to a broader base. Think it will be Burnham for PM though as Labour still seem to think they should go more left wing despite evidence to the contrary.

Sl0wS3as0n · Yesterday 07:31

HighHeelsRedLips · Yesterday 07:27

Try watching the video. Starmer is not a leader, he’s a silly sausage. Time for him to go. He will go down in history as being one of the worst PMs ever!

No I think Truss and Boris both need to argue over that crown. It’s hysterical you think Starmer even comes close to those buffoons.

Twiglets1 · Yesterday 07:32

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 07:31

It will be a massive relief to get rid of Reeves but not if she's replaced by Milliband. Another ego, whose sole interests lie in his own pet projects.

Why are they all so awful? 🥴

Lugol · Yesterday 07:32

Sl0wS3as0n · Yesterday 07:04

It wasn’t Labour who caused the UK to lose 6% of its economy via Brexit.

And?

This tired defence from Labour supporters trotted out any time anyone dares to state what a mess they have made and how everything is now even worse is so futile.

I am not a Labour supporter nor a Tory nor a Reform voter.

BadBadCat · Yesterday 07:32

Dragonscaledaisy · Yesterday 07:19

Angela Rayner obviously.

😂

Passingthrough123 · Yesterday 07:33

Happy to take the knee for the King of the North. Burnham's steady, fiscally competent and doesn't suffer fools gladly, which is extremely useful in Westminster. If he can steady the ship, Labour just might not cede to King Joffrey Farage and his Reform party in the next General Election.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 07:34

Iwantaircon · Yesterday 07:14

I like both of them. I’d rather starmer stayed , I think he’s decent and steady, and then Burnham lead labour at the next election.

It takes time to get ready for that. If you want Burnham for next GE you’re better to swap now.

APageInYourDiary · Yesterday 07:36

Pinkandpurplehearts · Yesterday 06:37

If by ‘the rich’ you’re including those working long hours in stressful and difficult jobs to earn a good salary, then yes, it is economically selfish (and greedy!) to think you can help yourself to more of their earned income. It’s their money! What makes you think you’re entitled to it? Go and earn more yourself….

Do you think it’s only the “rich” who have difficult and stressful jobs? How ridiculous. I work long hours in a difficult and stressful job but I’m not rich - dh earns significantly more than me but doesn’t work the hours I do. The utter bullshit that the more you earn the harder you work is such a fallacy. Tedious and ignorant 🙄

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 07:36

Lugol · Yesterday 07:32

And?

This tired defence from Labour supporters trotted out any time anyone dares to state what a mess they have made and how everything is now even worse is so futile.

I am not a Labour supporter nor a Tory nor a Reform voter.

Yes, and they are meant to be the grown ups. They were happy to dish out shit every week on here when the Tories were in. Different ball game when your party have got to make tough decisions. If it wasn't for the serious matter of the country's interests at heart, I'd be getting my popcorn out for the leadership challenge.

FlyingApple · Yesterday 07:36

We need stability, not leadership changes. I'm really annoyed at labour and Andy.

Whatabouterry · Yesterday 07:37

The absolutely last thing this country needs is even more instability.

None of the Labour government seem to have any decent strategies to promote growth. They all just want a fairer country and seem to think that business and taxes can fund their vision.

The reality though is that running a business right now is tough - it’s a challenging economic climate and Labours policies have made it even harder. Creating even more uncertainty is going to make things even more difficult. You need businesses to remain profitable if you are reliant on their tax revenue and you need stable governance to inspire confidence of investment into the UK.

I’m quite an optimistic person usually, but I’m extremely pessimistic about this.

Flyingintotheunknown · Yesterday 07:38

cloudtreecarpet · Yesterday 06:54

What absolute rubbish.
Starmer is not a "laughing stock" on the world stage at all.
The man who stood up to Trump and didn't let us get dragged into Trump's ego war in Iran back in February? When both Badenoch & Farage were vocal in their desire to plunge right into the mess? Just imagine if he had done that?
Trump is now scrabbling like mad to get out of a war he created and in which Iran are going to emerge the winners.
He is the laughing stock on the world stage, not Starmer.

He is an absolute laughing stock and if you can’t see that then it says more about you! He is a laughing stock for the very reason the world leaders can see his letting his own country go down the pan in favour of some made up dream of “fame” he has of being seen to be the one and only on the world stage.
Trump has also made him feel so small on the world stage many times too while the other leaders laughed on.

If you think the only good thing about him is for him to look good on the world stage while he lets our country and the people of our country go to shit then it really shows just how low your bar is for what you’ll accept from a government! Should be country first before world stage, not sell your country out to look like a big tough guy on the world stage. He looks ridiculous!

MandingoAteMyBaby · Yesterday 07:38

Dragonscaledaisy · Yesterday 06:03

That expectation was set by Labour themselves. Unless you voted Labour in the last election, you have no need to be embarrassed. The current shambles is entirely of Starmer's own making and sums up his entire short premiership with the party lurching from one psychodrama to the next, creating ongoing instability.

Not particularly a shambles in reality though.

Just in the hysterical media

Level1469 · Yesterday 07:38

Sl0wS3as0n · Yesterday 07:31

No I think Truss and Boris both need to argue over that crown. It’s hysterical you think Starmer even comes close to those buffoons.

Could you explain why?

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 07:38

Passingthrough123 · Yesterday 07:33

Happy to take the knee for the King of the North. Burnham's steady, fiscally competent and doesn't suffer fools gladly, which is extremely useful in Westminster. If he can steady the ship, Labour just might not cede to King Joffrey Farage and his Reform party in the next General Election.

😆 🤣 fiscally competent. Yeah, when it's appeasing trade unions then it's a free for all.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 07:38

HighHeelsRedLips · Yesterday 07:27

Try watching the video. Starmer is not a leader, he’s a silly sausage. Time for him to go. He will go down in history as being one of the worst PMs ever!

He won't, you know. He'll be a footnote in history at best. Lord Starmer of Oxted was, as Keir Starmer, a successful barrister, appointed Queen's Counsel, and generally thought to have done well as Director of Public Prosecutions, after which he was knighted. However, although he led his party to a huge General Election victory in 2024 and thereby became Prime Minister, his government made a number of questionable decisions (see main entry for UK Labour government 2024-2029) which led to a great drop in his popularity and his party's within a short time. He lost a leadership election to Lord Burnham of Makersfield in 2026 and was elevated to the House of Lords shortly afterwards.

Sl0wS3as0n · Yesterday 07:38

Lugol · Yesterday 07:32

And?

This tired defence from Labour supporters trotted out any time anyone dares to state what a mess they have made and how everything is now even worse is so futile.

I am not a Labour supporter nor a Tory nor a Reform voter.

A tired old defence! Seriously. It’s not old and going to get worse,the Bank of England has spoken today re how much of our economy we have lost because of it.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg75npqkq4o

The lack of the right owning what they did and the damaging it’s causing,shutting down any discussion on it or attempts to reverse some of the damage is the reason why we’re in a mess.

But crack on,carry on whining about VAT on school fees. 👏🏿

A cityscape of London's financial centre in London showing major bank skyscrapers.

Brexit cost 6% of UK economy, Bank of England company data suggests

Analysis showed how much the UK could have grown if it had not exited the EU.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg75npqkq4o

JuliaBraverman · Yesterday 07:39

cloudtreecarpet · Yesterday 06:46

But Mandelson only existed again because of Trump and his ridiculous tariffs & general unhinged nonsense & because of our over-reliance on America post-Brexit.
Clearly Mandelson knows exactly where the bodies are buried regarding Epstein and so he was trundled off to deal (blackmail?)with crazy Trump.

But Starmer was naive to believe that the correct due diligence had been done by McSweeny and co regarding Mandelson. He was clearly lied to about the depth of Mandelson's involvement in Epstein sh*t otherwise why would an intelligent man put himself in that position?

I’ve heard it all now! Oh it wouldn’t be Starmer’s fault would it… no it must be Trumps!

Passingthrough123 · Yesterday 07:39

Lugol · Yesterday 07:32

And?

This tired defence from Labour supporters trotted out any time anyone dares to state what a mess they have made and how everything is now even worse is so futile.

I am not a Labour supporter nor a Tory nor a Reform voter.

Tell me you know nothing about how Government policy is implemented and how legislation is brought in by telling me you know nothing about how Government policy is implemented and how legislation is brought in.

The Tories were in power for 14 years. Labour's been in power for just over 18 months. It takes so much time and red tape to undo a previous Govt's work, especially one that had carte blanche to do what it wanted for 14 years. It was only when Labour took office that they could properly go through the books and see how bad the UK's finances were – and that was just a slither of what they needed to do. I do think they have made lame mistakes along the way and I want Burnham to replace Starmer, but the reason people say this is because it's true.

Seasidecatlady · Yesterday 07:39

Starmer and Reeves are not up to the job.

A change will be good for Labour and for the country.

Maybe then we can now have a real Labour PM with real Labour policies...

And anyone who thinks Farage, a far right, work-shy, Moscow loving, grifter with dodgy donors could be a decent UK leader needs to seriously give their head a wobble.

Dollymylove · Yesterday 07:39

Grooming gang apologist and advocate of men in womens spaces. What's not to like?

EdithBond · Yesterday 07:40

Lugol · Yesterday 07:32

And?

This tired defence from Labour supporters trotted out any time anyone dares to state what a mess they have made and how everything is now even worse is so futile.

I am not a Labour supporter nor a Tory nor a Reform voter.

How is it futile, when the fella who agitated for Brexit, thereby tanking the economy, is now wanting to be PM - and people are voting for his party?

Surely, it’s not bemoaning what’s past, but being aware of the consequences of what you vote for?

JuliaBraverman · Yesterday 07:40

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 07:38

He won't, you know. He'll be a footnote in history at best. Lord Starmer of Oxted was, as Keir Starmer, a successful barrister, appointed Queen's Counsel, and generally thought to have done well as Director of Public Prosecutions, after which he was knighted. However, although he led his party to a huge General Election victory in 2024 and thereby became Prime Minister, his government made a number of questionable decisions (see main entry for UK Labour government 2024-2029) which led to a great drop in his popularity and his party's within a short time. He lost a leadership election to Lord Burnham of Makersfield in 2026 and was elevated to the House of Lords shortly afterwards.

Hi Kier….

mumumental · Yesterday 07:40

We’re already in the turmoil with Starmer. It’s just that it’s not intended.