To think Nigel Farage should be locked up?

[nobodyssons]

He was inciting violence with his “address to the nation” speech, calling for rage.

Meanwhile, he doesn’t care when women are actually murdered by the police

https://x.com/nigel_farage/status/1371213488882847749?s=46

Surely enough is enough and they need to take action?

Revolting.

I expect Farage is pleased for a distraction from inquiries about his £5 million donation.

More to come from that me thinks.

I thought you were fed up about whataboutery.

😬

Yes, the police locking up Farage right now would be a fabulous idea.

Do you want a civil war?

Oh dear - perhaps a little more reading of history would help.

Stalinist gulags - fascism?
North Korean Labour camps - fascism?
Iranian political prisoners from recent protests- fascism?

Honestly the intellectual quality of debate on MN just gets progressively worse.

😆

Intellectual quality of debate - would that be wishing people dead?

Yes let's lock up Nigel and let two violent rapists go free. What was that about two tier policing.

There's plenty of room for him in prison though due to Starmer's wonderful idea of freeing up room. Another bonkers Labour idea.

How many of Farage’s followers are going to have known the true definition? It’s well known that they generally aren’t the most educated people in the country, and given that a not insignificant number of his followers enjoy partaking in violence and will use any excuse for a fight, it was pretty obvious what was going to ensue.

All those people will have heard is the word ‘’rage’’ and taken that as a command and he knew that full well.
The ambiguity of the language was completely deliberate so that he could achieve the desired outcome whilst giving himself plausible deniability. He’s a complete hate mongering piece of shit.

You will not see Henry's words stencilled on a mural. No politician will quote them in the Commons. No corporation will change its logo. The same establishment that made four words immortal when spoken by a black man in Minneapolis has met the same four words, spoken by a white boy dying on a Southampton street, with what can only be described as a determined, institutional silence.
That silence is not neutral. It is a statement. It tells you exactly whose suffering the system has decided counts, and whose does not.
And it was produced not by the old racism - not by skinheads and yobs - but by the people who spent six years telling you they had abolished it.
By Konstantin Kisin

@JuliaBraverman when does the pure cold rage start for this?

Any murder is deplorable

As awful as that case is, I don't see the relevance to Farage's words @PoppyFleur

Or this

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyx0xkjmmgo

White man bad …..

So why is it okay for people to suggest Black man bad like white people including NF have been doing for decades, but if anyone counters it and points out your very selective rage, you don’t like it 😄 talk about DARVO

I see we've now for several ethnic minority murder cases being quoted. I'm nor sure why in this instance. Unless police were negligent in both cases?

Anyone who believes that such a high profile case didnt cross the desk of the DPP must be deluded. Apparently the grooming gangs files didn't either.
Oh and not forgetting nobody told the PM that Mandy had failed his vetting !!
There seems to be a theme here 🤔

The police have always been biased towards ethnic minorities. There are plenty of instances of this and even the police accept it. It’s just people don’t want to know and deny it. It’s definitely happening against white people though! Definitely!

What have those two murders got to do with that?

DARVO is more typical of this poster to be honest than me!

The police? Nothing. But you can bet your last penny that if the tables were turned, Farage et al. would be all over it crowing about immigration. He cares only if the skin colour, religion or the ancestry of a perpetrator can further his cause.

Skin colour comes first on the list as it’s the most notable ‘other’ characteristic, followed closely by religion and then if neither of those apply, he will target their name to see if he can use that to claim they’re not British. If it’s white British on British or white on black and doesn’t in any way involve a minority that has caused harm, he won’t care. Just like he also didn’t care about the Sikh woman who was raped in a racially aggravated attack.

Used to be about Eastern Europeans. It’s the same old tricks.