Nicola Sturgeon STILL didn't know her husband stole £400,000

[Imdunfer]

Follow on from previous thread.

What difference does that make? She had to sign the accounts off. I would hope that she’d take that seriously. Is it okay for her to say ‘yeh, whatevs’ and just sign it in your book? It’s not in mine.

So she was asked about herself. Do you think she should have ignored that and spoke about other people?

My "argument" is people opining on a topic they clearly know nothing about.

@Differentforgirls are you deliberately trying to drive people off the thread with such a huge number of overly pedantic and faux naïve posts?

It was quite a decent and informative debate up until that point.

Would you like to articulate your actual views?

Has she did something personal to you?

You're probably the most intelligent person on this thread!

No she didn't.

She's not really doing Sturgeon many favours.

Everybody is entitled to judge and comment. Your nit picking isn't going to stop that.

SHE DIDN'T.

I feel a bit sorry for her on a personal level. I think it's entirely plausible that she didn't realise the value of the stuff coming into her home. The salt grinder in our set it a bit dodgy right now so if dh came come with a new one I'd think he'd picked it up in tesco for £20 and eould be grateful. It wouldn't enter my head in a million years to ask him if it cost £2,000. I know jaguar cars are expensive but I don't know how expensive. It might be a lease arrangement or something, whi knows. She didn't drive, they had separate finances, she didn't care how he financed his car. She didn't think he had financed it by embezzling £££. That's not unreasonalble. That wouldn't be my first thought either.

But then on a professional level I 100% agree with @montysmaw about this

Daily accounts were below her pay grade yes.
However any leader should have sat up and taken note when allegations of a £600k fund going missing were raised.
She shoild also have paid attention when half the finance comittee resigned when her husband would not allow them access to the books to audit them

She was totally negligent in this. Whether because she didn't care enough, actively wanted to hide something, considered she had other more important things to worry about- who knows. It would be good if she could be honest about that.

She must be pretty confident that she's not going to be charged herself given that she's done a pretty high profile interview already.

The biggest % you can EVER have is 100%. But I am interested in what 1000% is. Can you explain it?

It's just a pity she won't end up in jail with a lovely brick shitehouse of a rapist as a cellmate. Perfectly willing to allow this for other women though.

That would have been poetic justice on a delicious scale.

Stop harassing people!

*done.

1000% is 10 times as much, because 100% is a whole. So 1000% of 10 would be 10 x 10.

If you had a £200 pepper grinder for example, then 1000% of that cost would be £2000.

She hasn't asked for one.

She seems to have not noticed the glaring ‘motor vehicles’ line on the balance sheet!

It's not Arabella coming across as a man. Your posting style is very aggressive.

No she's seeking legitimacy instead.

So this situation that you claim to oppose on feminist grounds would be okay if it happened to a woman you don’t like?

I’m sure you realise the women in prison will also have done things you wouldn’t approve of. Some things much worse than lacking professional oversight of their organisation. Worse than making bad policy decisions. Much worse even than embezzlement, if that’s what you think Sturgeon did.

So maybe it’s okay if they too have to share a cell with a rapist?

You are basically just saying you hope she gets raped. Great feminist you are.

Brace yourself, but - ArabellaScott isn't actually my real name, either.

However, I am indeed female. One of the boring cunty types.