Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Nicola Sturgeon STILL didn't know her husband stole £400,000

486 replies

Imdunfer · 01/06/2026 07:32

Follow on from previous thread.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 08:38

Imdunfer · 01/06/2026 08:20

Oh for god's sake, she broke every financial corporate governance rule in the book, including being in a close relationship with a direct report with whose expenses she was overseeing, before we start on the auditors resigning because they couldn't audit the accounts.

This has nothing to do with her being female and as a female I resent you thinking women are above criticism because they are women.

Yes people are allowed to and should be critical of politicians. But the level of personal attack and hatred she, and other women politicians, gets is a disgrace.

What do your threads hope to achieve? i'm assuming by perpetuating this attack on her and to discrediting the SNP you have a political agenda.

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · 01/06/2026 08:39

Violetparis · 01/06/2026 08:00

Keir Starmer, Nigel Farage, Boris Jihnson, Jeremy Corbyn all have/had vitriol directed at them. Nicola Sturgeon is being treated with the same contempt, she doesn't get a free pass because she's a woman. How pathetic that would be.

👏

LaliqueSaltGrinder · 01/06/2026 08:46

AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 08:38

Yes people are allowed to and should be critical of politicians. But the level of personal attack and hatred she, and other women politicians, gets is a disgrace.

What do your threads hope to achieve? i'm assuming by perpetuating this attack on her and to discrediting the SNP you have a political agenda.

It's the top story of the weekend. She is promoting discussion by allowing interviews on the telly with political journos. We are also allowed to discuss on here anything we like.

Laiste · 01/06/2026 08:46

Mybe there is a little more anger directed at her from women because we are disappointed in her. We have so few females in top positions compared to men. We're used to how low men can go. We see it daily.

I wonder weather we are more disappointed and let down precisely because she's a woman rather than 'even though'. We hoped for better.

Horrace · 01/06/2026 08:47

The glaringly obvious give away should have been the matching Dyson hair dryers.
He's a fucking baldy

I would have questioned that straight away

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · 01/06/2026 08:47

AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 08:29

She is not playing the victim.
She is a victim of a very nasty and very public campaign to destroy her.

People have every right to doubt her innocence in this matter. They have a right to their own views. But. She has not been charged with a criminal offence.
And people revelling in making nasty comments is just absolutely disgusting. What public good does it serve?

And Starmer, rightly imo , gets a lot of criticism. But never has he received anything like the personal derision and nastiness that Nicola gets hurled at her. For years she has been referred to by derogatory names and anyone who denies that the fact she is a woman hasn't played into the attacks on her is being disingenuous.

Nonsense. Absolute nonsense.

You don’t hold back any personal attacks on politicians who you don’t vote for I imagine, irrespective of sex.

Did you hold back from attacking Margaret Thatcher, Liz Truss, Michelle Mone etc for their behaviour on the basis that they are women? Guessing not. And you’d be right. As people are here given the scrutiny avoidant tactics of those at the top of the SNP.

She signed off on the accounts falsified by her husband and discouraged anyone from looking critically at party finances, as well documented and seen on video ffs. This is the bigger picture here, extremely poor governance and incompetence by a party of long term power in Scotland - not a failure to notice a motorhome parked in a driveway, which frankly her account of is, to put it mildly, utter mince.

PaterPower · 01/06/2026 08:50

Twisterlollies · 01/06/2026 08:00

Jokes aside, let’s look at the men on the hook for their wife’s shady behaviour over the last few years:

  1. Sunak and his wife’s legal-but-frowned-upon ‘non dom’ status
  2. Carrie Johnson and her expensive decorating taste for which Boris was quizzed over the invoices in the HoP
  3. Keir Starmer and Lady Starmer’s posh gifted frocks

None of the above broke the law, but was still seized upon as distasteful. So I call bollocks on this assertion that a man wouldn’t be held to account for his wife’s actions.

Nextly SHE WAS THE PARTY LEADER. She was where the buck stopped for all matters and that includes the accounts. So either:

  1. She was actively involved and covered it up which she denies and a criminal investigation has cleared her of any wrongdoing…
  2. OR she knew/suspected something shady was going on and looked the other way to save the party’s reputation
  3. OR she was so hopeless at leadership she didn’t notice a relatively large hole in her party’s relatively small coffers and didn’t pay attention when 3 councillors resigned over not having access to the accounts they were supposed to be monitoring

🤷‍♀️ and yes naturally all 3 of those options will draw criticism, and rightly so

Edited
  • John Bercow and his wife Sally’s redecoration expenses (although I suspect Bercow didn’t need much encouragement)
  • Blair and his wife Cherie’s various business ventures, including “Cheriegate”
Imdunfer · 01/06/2026 08:54

AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 08:00

I think your post here says it all about the people who are revelling in seeing a woman being put on public trial when the police and Scottish Justice system found no evidence of wrong doing.

Why not bring back public lynching while you are at it?

Edited

The business community, on the other hand, have plenty of evidence of actions which are either gross incompetence or active wrongdoing.

OP posts:
TeaAndStrumpets · 01/06/2026 08:55

LaliqueSaltGrinder · 01/06/2026 08:24

I'm Scottish! Born in the east, live in the west. Not a fan of Sturgeon and the rest of them.

She does not get a free pass by turning on the waterworks and kidding on that she didn't know what Pete was up to. That in itself shows either a profound lack of curiosity "How did we afford a new Jag, Pete" or a wilful turning a blind eye.

Irrespective of the marriage she should have been checking the accounts and did not. She ignored advice from Salmond that being leader of the party when your husband is CEO leave you open to accusations of fraud/lack of transparency. She threatened members of the SNP management committee when people asked questions.

But yeah, poor wee victimised Nicky.

I have been reading about Nicola Sturgeon's brief legal career. She didn't cover herself in glory but seems to have avoided being struck off. The upheld complaints all relate to her failure to pass on a completed legal aid application form from a victim of domestic violence. Luckily for NS she got elected soon after so could start a new career as a politician. Perhaps she's just not good with details?

OneTealShaker · 01/06/2026 08:56

Her interview on Laura Keunesberg was a the most obvious display of narcissism ever.

She is absolutely shameless. It’s all about her. It beggars belief that she has zero self awareness.

Maybe she’s been taking lessons from Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

OneTealShaker · 01/06/2026 08:57

TeaAndStrumpets · 01/06/2026 08:55

I have been reading about Nicola Sturgeon's brief legal career. She didn't cover herself in glory but seems to have avoided being struck off. The upheld complaints all relate to her failure to pass on a completed legal aid application form from a victim of domestic violence. Luckily for NS she got elected soon after so could start a new career as a politician. Perhaps she's just not good with details?

Well, we all know she is a misogynist.

Isla Bryson would tell you as much:

ByGraptharsHammer · 01/06/2026 08:59

Pah. I thought her “interview”, which her lawyer attended, btw, was not that effective.

108 toilet rolls tells its own story. Where did those live?

Imdunfer · 01/06/2026 09:02

Laiste · 01/06/2026 08:46

Mybe there is a little more anger directed at her from women because we are disappointed in her. We have so few females in top positions compared to men. We're used to how low men can go. We see it daily.

I wonder weather we are more disappointed and let down precisely because she's a woman rather than 'even though'. We hoped for better.

This definitely. Women have enough trouble getting to the top of organisations without one of our own making such a visible and documented hash of managing one.

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 01/06/2026 09:09

AnonymityAnonymity · 01/06/2026 08:00

I think your post here says it all about the people who are revelling in seeing a woman being put on public trial when the police and Scottish Justice system found no evidence of wrong doing.

Why not bring back public lynching while you are at it?

Edited

QUITE RIGHT HEN ITS A PURE WITCH HUNT WHEN AHM THE ACTUAL VICTIM HERE ITS NO LIKE I HUD ANY IDEA WHIT WIS GOIN ON WI THE ACCOUNTS O MAH PAIRTY OR FORWHY ABDY WIS GOIN ON ABOOT ODDITING THEM AW THE TIME!!!

ArabellaScott · 01/06/2026 09:10

Oh, bugger. 😂

DOXXED MASEL.

Brownpuppy · 01/06/2026 09:18

Dancingsquirrels · 01/06/2026 08:31

Johnson Carmichael were the SNP auditors from August 2010 to October 2022, when Peter Murrell was embezzling funds
https://www.accountingweb.co.uk/any-answers/high-profile-case-of-fraud-by-employee

SNP require to lodge annual accounts https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-66132534

Johnson Carmichael didn't resign until April 2023 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-65212357

So, even if SNP weren't answering questions from within the party, I'd still like to know how Johnson Carmichael missed this. Surely they had access to the records, or they would have resigned far earlier?

Of all of this terrible case I want to understand the auditing aspect.

I am no SNP or NS fan, quite the opposite in fact. I know I am in a minority but I believe her. I watched her interview. I believe I was watching a genuinely traumatised woman. I do, however, also see incompetence and lack of judgment. I know I will be called naive but it’s my view.

If anyone in my family gave me a gift, say, of salt and pepper pots you could not get me to even imagine a price like those on bought. Wouldn’t even register. That’s just one example. Joseph Joseph hardly wildly expensive, again wouldn’t bat an eyelid.

I have never believed that the wife or family of say a drug dealer is unaware. No matter what they say. Clearly if someone is not “normal” working, pays huge rents in cash, buys most stuff in cash, I would not believe a wife if she were to say similar to Nicola. People who are great deceivers are just thst, so many sad tales of highly intelligent people being scammed for example. I feel it is absolutely credible she didn’t know or even suspect. I just don’t see why she would lie here and what she would have to gain.

JustAnotherWhinger · 01/06/2026 09:19

LaliqueSaltGrinder · 01/06/2026 08:24

I'm Scottish! Born in the east, live in the west. Not a fan of Sturgeon and the rest of them.

She does not get a free pass by turning on the waterworks and kidding on that she didn't know what Pete was up to. That in itself shows either a profound lack of curiosity "How did we afford a new Jag, Pete" or a wilful turning a blind eye.

Irrespective of the marriage she should have been checking the accounts and did not. She ignored advice from Salmond that being leader of the party when your husband is CEO leave you open to accusations of fraud/lack of transparency. She threatened members of the SNP management committee when people asked questions.

But yeah, poor wee victimised Nicky.

Alex Salmond announcing after he’d left, and after they’d fallen out, that he said he’d being leader and him CEO was a bad idea also actually shows how shit he was.

He was very happy for her to be leader and Murrell CEO when that was his path back to being leader and future first minister.

The plan was always for her to succeed him so given he mentored her and Murrell was already CEO he should have been a major player in the transparency set up for that possibility.

However, given Murrell was thieving on his watch he wasn’t even on the ball when he was in charge, let alone any future planning.

JustAnotherWhinger · 01/06/2026 09:22

Dancingsquirrels · 01/06/2026 08:31

Johnson Carmichael were the SNP auditors from August 2010 to October 2022, when Peter Murrell was embezzling funds
https://www.accountingweb.co.uk/any-answers/high-profile-case-of-fraud-by-employee

SNP require to lodge annual accounts https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-66132534

Johnson Carmichael didn't resign until April 2023 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-65212357

So, even if SNP weren't answering questions from within the party, I'd still like to know how Johnson Carmichael missed this. Surely they had access to the records, or they would have resigned far earlier?

So many people have questions to answer.

Johnson Carmichael.
Every audit & finance committee prior to the one that quit.
Every leader and deputy leader - which includes the current incumbents.
Colin Beattie.

CeciliaMars · 01/06/2026 09:25

I think her being a woman is irrelevant. She was in a position of great power, hence open to scrutiny. I know exactly what my husband earns. If new, expensive things started appearing all over the place, I would know something weird was going on.

Brownpuppy · 01/06/2026 09:28

CeciliaMars · 01/06/2026 09:25

I think her being a woman is irrelevant. She was in a position of great power, hence open to scrutiny. I know exactly what my husband earns. If new, expensive things started appearing all over the place, I would know something weird was going on.

Would you know if you didn’t live together much of the time, worked non stop, and he perhaps hid a lot of stuff or gave it away. Really? I know I wouldn’t, wouldn’t even cross my mind if someone I trusted.

ByGraptharsHammer · 01/06/2026 09:29

What I noticed was her bridling about being made to compensate or hand over assets regarding what her ex husband did.

Over time, what he did was an overall financial benefit to her household. The pens and the toilet rolls are headlines. But ultimately it mean that they spent (as a couple) on more assets like property. Sturgeon did get divorced of course, but I do not know if that ring fences her assets from the marriage.

The investigation cost 2 million pounds.

LaliqueSaltGrinder · 01/06/2026 09:29

I think it's also important to remember that the SNP doesn't tolerate dissent. Their MPs and MSPs are whipped to within an inch of their arses. They MUST vote in a block for whatever the SNP leadership says is the party stance. If they break ranks and rebel, they are suspended from the party. This is what happened to Fergus Ewing, who has been in the SNP for yonks.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-66941281

So you have this atmosphere that you have to keep your head down and do what you're told, or you're out on your ear. So people do just that because they know that without the "SNP" branding on a ballot paper nobody is going to vote for them. It's really not the way to run any organisation.

lcakethereforeIam · 01/06/2026 09:39

Wasn't the campervan explained away as being bought for the SNP to use as a campaign vehicle?

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 01/06/2026 09:47

@LaliqueSaltGrinder Didn’t MS Cherry have an issue with all
the secrecy and lack of openness? She suspected poor accounting I think. NS and PM controlled everything. Swinney is being an idiot. He should ensure the party explains how this happened and what they are doing to ensure money from donors is spent appropriately. Just saying the police investigated so that’s ok, is not good enough. But he was in the thick of it too, wasn’t he!

LaliqueSaltGrinder · 01/06/2026 09:49

And look what happened to Joanna Cherry. Ousted and shunned. She's a strong character who can take it and has a legal career to fall back on. Many other MSPs can't believe their luck getting voted into a cushy job with a good salary and just keep their heads down.