Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to stop therapy after learning my therapist’s husband is Reform?

731 replies

CanyonRider · 25/05/2026 18:20

I live in a small town. I started having therapy maybe a year ago. I feel it’s been working for me and I like my therapist. However I realised today that she is (very very recently) married to a man who recently stood and won as a reform councillor in our local election. I detest reform. I’m married to an immigrant (EU citizen) and am delighted that my kids are dual nationals and have the option of travelling, working and living in the EU should they desire. I’m also very pro the transition to green energy. I have solar and drive an EV. Finally I cannot stand Farage and the political grift embodied by people like him and Jenrick and am dismayed by the harms caused by Brexit.

My therapist is also an EU national and is here under indefinite leave to remain - as is my wife.
Read a few interviews with her husband today and he spouts the usual anti EU, anti immigration, anti green transition rhetoric you’d expect from Reform. I don’t feel comfortable continuing therapy with someone who’s married to a reform politician, and am very surprised that she is comfortable with his views and by extension those of Farage.

Am I overreacting?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Gofnfnf · Yesterday 11:50

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 10:59

We can all say we’ll do whatever we want. Tell me how will Reform ‘bring down energy costs? Do you know why our energy costs are higher than equivalent countries?*

*Clue: it’s not green levies and carbon taxes.

Edited

Cutting carbon taxes, green levies and VAT will bring costs down

Owly11 · Yesterday 12:18

5128gap · Yesterday 08:55

The therapist won't be 'fired'. She is not the OPs employee. She is a service provider that the OP is at liberty to patronise with her custom or not.
I know it sounds more dramatic and frames the therapist as a victim if you use 'fired', and gives you the opportunity to frame us as heading for a dystopia where women's employment is at risk, but its not an accurate description of the situation.
The therapist is no more 'fired' than your hairdresser would be if you decided to go elsewhere for whatever reason you chose.

'Fired' in respect of therapy is usual parlance. Sometimes clients fire their therapist and sometimes therapists fire their clients. Yes therapists are often, but not always, self employed but that makes them more not less vulnerable. They won't have employment protection rights. If everyone took the stupid approach of op, firing someone they have no actual problem with but based on the political views of her husband, then she would struggle to earn a living right? It would be a witch hunt. Any time a group of people decide that another section of the population are scum based on beliefs or politics or religion or skin colour, and and that such section of the population should be boycotted and ostracised, you are basically looking at oppression and mob rule. It's the antithesis of a civilised society and not the kind of society I want to live in.

And to all the posters who expect higher standards of therapists than other professionals it shows a deep seated misunderstanding of what therapy is. What op should actually do is raise his issues with the therapist and talk it through - that would be far more productive and therapeutic. But I dare say he won't because he sounds like a pompous arse who prefers to see others as lesser than himself.

bigboykitty · Yesterday 12:21

Owly11 · Yesterday 12:18

'Fired' in respect of therapy is usual parlance. Sometimes clients fire their therapist and sometimes therapists fire their clients. Yes therapists are often, but not always, self employed but that makes them more not less vulnerable. They won't have employment protection rights. If everyone took the stupid approach of op, firing someone they have no actual problem with but based on the political views of her husband, then she would struggle to earn a living right? It would be a witch hunt. Any time a group of people decide that another section of the population are scum based on beliefs or politics or religion or skin colour, and and that such section of the population should be boycotted and ostracised, you are basically looking at oppression and mob rule. It's the antithesis of a civilised society and not the kind of society I want to live in.

And to all the posters who expect higher standards of therapists than other professionals it shows a deep seated misunderstanding of what therapy is. What op should actually do is raise his issues with the therapist and talk it through - that would be far more productive and therapeutic. But I dare say he won't because he sounds like a pompous arse who prefers to see others as lesser than himself.

No it's not. Have literally never heard of anyone firing their therapist or being fired by their therapist having worked in the field for 30 years. It's errant nonsense.

Owly11 · Yesterday 12:28

bigboykitty · Yesterday 12:21

No it's not. Have literally never heard of anyone firing their therapist or being fired by their therapist having worked in the field for 30 years. It's errant nonsense.

You should get out more then.

MadderthanMorris · Yesterday 12:35

Poor little Reform supporters. All they want to do is vote through a referendum that decimates our economy and stifles our children's futures; shout their tits off about immigration policy that is both potentially devastating to thousands and economically self-defeating anyway; render the climate of the very Earth we live on uninhabitable; jump to conclusions about every damn crime that gets reported about how it must have been those horrible muslim asylum seekers (and then go strangely silent when they're wrong); go to marches to hear the likes of Tommy Ten Names spout vile, bigoted crap about their bogeyman du jour; vote for a party that openly plans to remove free access to healthcare, destroy the government's tax base and therefore all possibility of decent public services with it, and turbo-charge our already spiralling economic inequality...

And people won't even be nice to them and be their fwiends!

The far right insanity taking over the world at the moment is a revolting disease, and the people who openly and proudly attempt to impose it upon our futures can go wallow in their festering hole of self pity and do whatever they have to do. It's not our responsibility to make them feel better about their racism or their gullibility. Our responsibility as citizens and as parents is to fight back and salvage whatever sliver of hope for humanity we can.

I'm not going to tell you you should find another therapist, but that's what I'd be doing. And I'd tell her exactly why.

Lifeomars · Yesterday 12:36

DeathNote11 · Yesterday 06:18

My fiancé has 2 flag poles in his garden. He's flying the Union & St George's cross. Should I be fired?

From a cannon?

Misnofitness · Yesterday 12:42

Lifeomars · Yesterday 12:36

From a cannon?

Why would you say something so aggressive?? That is what facsim is. Telling someone they can’t beleive something and they can’t vote that way. I don’t vote reform but neither do I stoop to the level of just being horrible.

MadderthanMorris · Yesterday 12:45

Owly11 · Yesterday 12:18

'Fired' in respect of therapy is usual parlance. Sometimes clients fire their therapist and sometimes therapists fire their clients. Yes therapists are often, but not always, self employed but that makes them more not less vulnerable. They won't have employment protection rights. If everyone took the stupid approach of op, firing someone they have no actual problem with but based on the political views of her husband, then she would struggle to earn a living right? It would be a witch hunt. Any time a group of people decide that another section of the population are scum based on beliefs or politics or religion or skin colour, and and that such section of the population should be boycotted and ostracised, you are basically looking at oppression and mob rule. It's the antithesis of a civilised society and not the kind of society I want to live in.

And to all the posters who expect higher standards of therapists than other professionals it shows a deep seated misunderstanding of what therapy is. What op should actually do is raise his issues with the therapist and talk it through - that would be far more productive and therapeutic. But I dare say he won't because he sounds like a pompous arse who prefers to see others as lesser than himself.

What absolute codswallop. Nobody is under any obligation to go to any particular therapist and - notwithstanding whatever notice period etc. may have been agreed - they can stop any time they like for whatever reason they like.

And not wanting to ostracise parts of the population doesn't mean you have to tolerate people who actually ARE doing things that are morally repugnant or, more importantly, practically harmful to the rest of us.

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 12:47

Gofnfnf · Yesterday 11:50

Cutting carbon taxes, green levies and VAT will bring costs down

You’re just repeating yourself, so I’ll assume you don’t have any more information yourself.

What Reform have proposed would cut bills by about £80-170 per household per year - funded by cuts to public spending, much of which the poorest households rely on - but it would still be much more expensive than comparator countries.

MadderthanMorris · Yesterday 12:47

Misnofitness · Yesterday 12:42

Why would you say something so aggressive?? That is what facsim is. Telling someone they can’t beleive something and they can’t vote that way. I don’t vote reform but neither do I stoop to the level of just being horrible.

That's not actually what fascism is.

Dexternight · Yesterday 12:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Misnofitness · Yesterday 12:50

MadderthanMorris · Yesterday 12:47

That's not actually what fascism is.

It is characterised by dictorial power and this poster promoting violence against people who don’t subscribe to her way of thinking is where the far left goes round and reaches the far right

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 12:51

Misnofitness · Yesterday 12:42

Why would you say something so aggressive?? That is what facsim is. Telling someone they can’t beleive something and they can’t vote that way. I don’t vote reform but neither do I stoop to the level of just being horrible.

JFC, why does no-one know the actual meaning of fascism?

From Merriam Webster (a dictionary not a person before anyone gets confused)

Fascism : a populist political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual, that is associated with a centralized autocraticgovernment headed by a dictatorial leader, and that is characterized by severe economic and social regimentation and by forcible suppression of opposition.

It’s not a difference of opinion on Mumsnet, however strong. It’s organised oppression by the state or para-state actors, often including militarisation.

Definition of FASCISTA

a member of an Italian political organization under Mussolini governing Italy 1922—1943 according to the principles of fascism… See the full definition

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Fascista

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 12:53

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Flamingojune · Yesterday 12:53

I dont think i could trust or respect someone with such terrible taste

Misnofitness · Yesterday 12:53

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 12:51

JFC, why does no-one know the actual meaning of fascism?

From Merriam Webster (a dictionary not a person before anyone gets confused)

Fascism : a populist political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual, that is associated with a centralized autocraticgovernment headed by a dictatorial leader, and that is characterized by severe economic and social regimentation and by forcible suppression of opposition.

It’s not a difference of opinion on Mumsnet, however strong. It’s organised oppression by the state or para-state actors, often including militarisation.

Yes and these posters who promote violence against a different opinion clearly want state wide oppression of anyone who doesn’t beleive their way of thinking.

what do you call a violent response to anyone who doesn’t think their way? Is there a term for it?

Misnofitness · Yesterday 12:57

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ha! Im dyslexic - but don’t worry I’m used to the ableism of being dyslexic

Misnofitness · Yesterday 12:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Sorry for being dyslexic! But thanks for being mean about it

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 13:03

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · Yesterday 11:16

I thought I had made myself abundantly clear but apparently I haven't so I will try again.

Reform should absolutely be held to account

There is plenty wrong with their policies

They have plenty of people in the party who should not be

As they are leading the polls, they need and deserve even greater scrutiny than other parties (though so do the Greens) and I very much welcome it

I'm not voting for them

The way we hold them to account is by clearly and intelligently criticising their policies, manifestos and actions.

It is not by shouting Nazi, Far Right and race supremacy. Because those accusations are demonstrably false and it gives Reform's defenders - not me - the ammunition needed to dismiss those emotional attacks

When what is actually needed is clear firm, not emotional, critiques of their position.

Does that make sense?

I am appealing for a higher quality of political debate because otherwise we really are in trouble.

I would add however there is no party on the left that has a clear unequivocally supportive stance on female rights to safety, privacy and dignity in single sex spaces. And that worries me a lot.

This isn’t a thread about political debate though, it’s about whether OP is unreasonable to sack her therapist having found out who her husband is.

Would you work with a therapist who did not support single sex spaces in schools?

OneStarAwake · Yesterday 13:03

Misnofitness · Yesterday 12:53

Yes and these posters who promote violence against a different opinion clearly want state wide oppression of anyone who doesn’t beleive their way of thinking.

what do you call a violent response to anyone who doesn’t think their way? Is there a term for it?

Who on this thread has promoted violence against a different opinion? I think you are over-egging your pudding.

MadderthanMorris · Yesterday 13:03

Yes and these posters who promote violence against a different opinion clearly want state wide oppression of anyone who doesn’t beleive their way of thinking.

That doesn't follow at all. People promote violence on a personal level all the time without necessarily wanting it to be state oppression.

what do you call a violent response to anyone who doesn’t think their way? Is there a term for it?

They weren't responding to anyone who doesn't think their way, they were responding to one particular individual about one particular subject.

And FFS, they were obviously joking. Get over yourself.

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 13:05

Misnofitness · Yesterday 12:58

Sorry for being dyslexic! But thanks for being mean about it

I was actually making a joke about the woeful understanding of fascism by multiple posters. I didn’t even notice your typo and I knew what you meant, which is why my reply to you focused on your failure to understand the term, not your spelling of it.

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 13:08

Misnofitness · Yesterday 12:53

Yes and these posters who promote violence against a different opinion clearly want state wide oppression of anyone who doesn’t beleive their way of thinking.

what do you call a violent response to anyone who doesn’t think their way? Is there a term for it?

Who on earth is promoting violence? You should report that.

We just call that violence. It’s handy to have different words to describe different things.

PerhapsaSillyQuestion · Yesterday 13:10

I can't understand this view point at all DH and I probably vote difernrt we are different people.

Anyone can vote reform indeed the two most vehement reform voters I know are both polish.

Misnofitness · Yesterday 13:15

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 13:08

Who on earth is promoting violence? You should report that.

We just call that violence. It’s handy to have different words to describe different things.

I did. A poster said her partner had a Union Jack flag and asked if he should be fired and another poster said ‘yes, from a canon’.

this is what I feel is wrong is instead of having any kind of discussion they tell people to get in the bin. This is why reform are so popular because if you squash the discourse and discussion of just moves people to a movement where they feel they can express an opinion without getting cancelled. From what I’ve found it’s the people who say ‘hope not hate’ who are the most hateful and mean ones to deal with