Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think it is acceptable to smack someone if they touch your body, even if they have dementia?

1000 replies

haleey · 25/05/2026 12:38

I visit my grandad in a care home regularly and sometimes male residents will touch women unexpectedly. I’ve had my waist touched, boobs grabbed and one man touched my privates while smiling at me. I know they are ill and confused, but honestly I think people act as though women are supposed to just tolerate it because “they can’t help it”.

Part of this for me is that I have been assaulted before, so my reflex when someone suddenly touches me unexpectedly is to hit out before I even properly think. It is an automatic panic response.

Recently one resident suddenly grabbed me and I instinctively smacked his hand away. One of the staff immediately told me off and said “he can’t help it”. I understand that dementia affects behaviour and judgement, but I found it upsetting that the focus instantly became about him rather than acknowledging that I had just been touched without consent and panicked.

I’m not talking about beating vulnerable elderly people or deliberately hurting confused residents. But I also don’t think women should be expected to quietly accept unwanted touching because the person is elderly or cognitively impaired.

OP posts:
TheignT · 26/05/2026 13:20

ChalkOutlines · 26/05/2026 13:18

Will they? How?

By supervising them male and female. You don't seriously think staff are there to look after visitors. It's a dementia home, if you can't cope with that then stay away

ChalkOutlines · 26/05/2026 13:20

Myyearmytime · 26/05/2026 13:18

This up the female residential family to decide if this place is right place for them .

Funny how it’s always the females (or their families in case of residents) that have to adjust , manage , restrict themselves and make changes.

BIossomtoes · 26/05/2026 13:21

Pigeonpoodle · 26/05/2026 13:19

I’m convinced that the vast majority of people would see mildly slapping away a groping hand to be entirely appropriate. In fact I think they’d be bewildered at why this was even an issue!

It seems like the reaction to the routine smacking of children in previous generations has exceeded all rational bounds with some people.

If we are at the point that a mild instinctive tap in response to sexual assault is considered assault, and worthy of being banned, rather than a natural and appropriate response to a major violation for which the recipient needs supporting, then we have entered the twilight zone, where wrong is right and right is wrong.

It’s this attitude that the focus should be on the negligible harm caused to the abuser in receipt of a mild tap, at the expense of the trauma caused by a sexual assault, and the expectation that the victim must behave impeccably in not reacting to the assault, that is on a parr with the judge’s attitude in the appalling sentences given to the Fordingbridge gang rapists.

It’s nothing of the sort. That comparison is disingenuous to say the least.

haleey · 26/05/2026 13:21

Myyearmytime · 26/05/2026 13:19

@haleey how would feel if your grandad was hit by vistor

If he touched someone in an unwanted way and they hit back as a reflex, then that is fair enough.

OP posts:
OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:21

Myyearmytime · 26/05/2026 13:18

This up the female residential family to decide if this place is right place for them .

Wow. This response really sums up much of this thread in a nutshell. Women always get the short end of the stick.

Differentforgirls · 26/05/2026 13:21

haleey · 26/05/2026 13:20

Victim blaming again.

I shouldn't visit my grandad in his own home now because the other people who live in their home assault me. But it is their home (even though have no right to stop anyone visiting).

You have a cheek to talk about another poster being unable to read.

TheignT · 26/05/2026 13:21

haleey · 26/05/2026 13:20

Victim blaming again.

I shouldn't visit my grandad in his own home now because the other people who live in their home assault me. But it is their home (even though have no right to stop anyone visiting).

The home have every right to say who can and cannot visit.

haleey · 26/05/2026 13:22

ChalkOutlines · 26/05/2026 13:20

Funny how it’s always the females (or their families in case of residents) that have to adjust , manage , restrict themselves and make changes.

I have been told I need to stay out of the way 🙄

OP posts:
haleey · 26/05/2026 13:22

TheignT · 26/05/2026 13:21

The home have every right to say who can and cannot visit.

The residents don't.

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 26/05/2026 13:22

haleey · 26/05/2026 13:22

I have been told I need to stay out of the way 🙄

Yes, repeatedly. Why won’t you?

OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:22

Differentforgirls · 26/05/2026 13:19

So you think that the woman who assaulted my husband should have been locked away at visiting time?

Yes, obviously. Her family could visit her in her room. I'd also be concerned about other residents, depending on her behaviour.

haleey · 26/05/2026 13:24

OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:19

Will they? Have you asked them personally? No? Well, then.

People talk like they know the home, the residents and the staff!

OP posts:
ChalkOutlines · 26/05/2026 13:24

TheignT · 26/05/2026 13:20

By supervising them male and female. You don't seriously think staff are there to look after visitors. It's a dementia home, if you can't cope with that then stay away

If the males are supervised how come they got close enough to OP? Are all residents kept separated and not in grabbing distance? Do female residents all have a 1 2 1?

haleey · 26/05/2026 13:25

OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:18

No, but people who have been sexually violated may be more likely to have instinctive responses.

Good for you! How terribly well evolved of you. I don't think I would necessarily be able to control myself - but it's equally possible that I might freeze up and regress and be unable to react to defend myself, as it is that I might swat a hand away.

Personally, I think that care homes should make sure their residents can't sexually assault visitors or other residents, rather than that family members should be unable to visit their loved ones lest they be sexually assaulted.

Well said 👏

OP posts:
Differentforgirls · 26/05/2026 13:25

OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:22

Yes, obviously. Her family could visit her in her room. I'd also be concerned about other residents, depending on her behaviour.

Well thankfully, she wasn't. She ISN'T WELL.

OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:26

Differentforgirls · 26/05/2026 13:25

Well thankfully, she wasn't. She ISN'T WELL.

Why thankfully? And what does her being unwell have to do with anything?

Pigeonpoodle · 26/05/2026 13:27

Mental capacity, whether low intelligence or dementia should not be seen as an excuse for sexual violence. Yes, those individuals may have diminished ability, but they still recognise what they are doing. We are dehumanising them by pretending they are incapable of acting morally, and that women must just suck it up of they are the victims of it, and god forbid the try and protect themselves by tapping away groping hands, lest the groped experiences a moment of slight discomfort following the tap.

BIossomtoes · 26/05/2026 13:28

OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:26

Why thankfully? And what does her being unwell have to do with anything?

Jesus Christ! Did you actually say that?

Differentforgirls · 26/05/2026 13:31

OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:26

Why thankfully? And what does her being unwell have to do with anything?

OMG. You do realise that we are talking about places that people are mentally unwell in?

And thankfully because she's someone's daughter, wife, mum, granny. aunty etc and, although my husband was upset about what happened, he just avoided her after that because he realised she just wasn't well and she was all of these things to her family.

Differentforgirls · 26/05/2026 13:31

BIossomtoes · 26/05/2026 13:28

Jesus Christ! Did you actually say that?

I know!

OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:31

BIossomtoes · 26/05/2026 13:28

Jesus Christ! Did you actually say that?

No, obviously I didn't say it, which is why you didn't just read it Hmm

Yes, if a dementia patient is known to sexually violate visitors, then their family should visit them in their room, to avoid it happening. Horrors!! Additionally, if they are repeatedly being sexually inappropriate with other residents, they need to be either kept separate, or have constant supervision.

Honestly, I think it's strange that you all want your loved ones suffering from dementia to wander around and sexually violate people - wouldn't they, in their right minds, have wanted to be prevented from doing that? I know I would!

Differentforgirls · 26/05/2026 13:32

Pigeonpoodle · 26/05/2026 13:27

Mental capacity, whether low intelligence or dementia should not be seen as an excuse for sexual violence. Yes, those individuals may have diminished ability, but they still recognise what they are doing. We are dehumanising them by pretending they are incapable of acting morally, and that women must just suck it up of they are the victims of it, and god forbid the try and protect themselves by tapping away groping hands, lest the groped experiences a moment of slight discomfort following the tap.

And men then because it happens to them too.

OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:33

Differentforgirls · 26/05/2026 13:31

OMG. You do realise that we are talking about places that people are mentally unwell in?

And thankfully because she's someone's daughter, wife, mum, granny. aunty etc and, although my husband was upset about what happened, he just avoided her after that because he realised she just wasn't well and she was all of these things to her family.

What on earth does any of that blather have to do with the home keeping her away from visitors that aren't related to her at visiting times, so she can see her family without groping people?

Pigeonpoodle · 26/05/2026 13:35

haleey · 26/05/2026 13:21

If he touched someone in an unwanted way and they hit back as a reflex, then that is fair enough.

Exactly, why would this be an issue.

I love my relatives dearly, and we are not a violent family in the slightest, but if hypotheticallymy father got dementia and someone slapped him away if he tried to grope them, I’d be mortified and my thoughts would be with the victim. I’m 100% sure the men who get slapped away when they grope aren’t traumatised by the experience of a mild tap.

The ability of some people not to be able to distinguish between violent assault and an instinctive mild slap in response to sexual assault is staggering.

Differentforgirls · 26/05/2026 13:36

OtterlyAstounding · 26/05/2026 13:33

What on earth does any of that blather have to do with the home keeping her away from visitors that aren't related to her at visiting times, so she can see her family without groping people?

FFS, because it was a one off as she'd taken a shine to him. She thought he was gorgeous. We moved to a room and let her stay with her pals in the communal area.

It's a thing called "compassion" - google it maybe.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread