I didn’t quote or respond to the rest of what that pp said, because I couldn’t be bothered getting into it, but since you’ve called me disingenuous, I’ll bite. She said:
Alcohol is less harmful than cocaine because the risk from dying from one or two uses of it are extremely rare.
That is the main reason why cocaine is illegal and alcohol is not.
That is incorrect.
Do many people die from one or two uses of cocaine? No. It is also rare.
There is obviously a fatal level of cocaine, as there is with alcohol. You wouldn’t drink an entire bottle of vodka in one go, why would that be any different with using cocaine?
You say:
It's deeply disingenuous to imply alcohol is just as dangerous as cocaine and we only see it as safer due to culture. Cocaine is far more addictive and dangerous.
Alcohol use is completely normalised in society. Humans have been drinking alcohol socially for thousands of years. Making it illegal has been tried before. How well did Prohibition go?
The fact is that alcohol is just as addictive and dangerous as any other drug, it causes more problems for individuals than any other drug and it causes more issues societally than any other drug. If it were to be discovered tomorrow. It would not be legalised.
Because it is dangerous, it is addictive and to suggest it is somehow less harmful than cocaine because people can use it recreationally is ridiculous.
People also use cocaine recreationally.
There have been so many comments on this thread calling the OP’s son an addict. I simply said that recreational cocaine use does not make someone an addict, just like recreational alcohol use does not make someone an alcoholic. I couldn’t care less about cocaine.