Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think these boys should have been incarcerated?

767 replies

newrubylane · 21/05/2026 14:06

BBC News - Teenage boys sentenced for raping lone girls
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clypg68e2neo

I've never started an AIBU before, but I'm genuinely really shocked. I'm just not sure how this sentence is justifiable. Their actions were premeditated and deliberate, they were carrying a knife and they filmed themselves. They're obviously a danger to women/girls, and probably to other boys too.

If anyone knows how and why this sentence might have come about, I'd be interested to hear it.

A footpath beside a river, leading under a road bridge

Teenage boys sentenced for raping lone girls in Fordingbridge

The boys filmed themselves laughing and encouraging each other as they raped girls in separate attacks.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clypg68e2neo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
RapunzelHadExtensions · Yesterday 08:23

I have also written to my MP and raised an unduly Lenient complaint.

As a police officer I despair. It looks like the force is liaising with CPS with the support of the families to get this re looked at. A slap in the face not just for those poor victims and their families, but also the officers who will have worked incredibly hard with a lot of very clear and damming evidence, and for what?

ArabellaScott · Yesterday 08:25

RapunzelHadExtensions · Yesterday 08:23

I have also written to my MP and raised an unduly Lenient complaint.

As a police officer I despair. It looks like the force is liaising with CPS with the support of the families to get this re looked at. A slap in the face not just for those poor victims and their families, but also the officers who will have worked incredibly hard with a lot of very clear and damming evidence, and for what?

I really feel for police who work so hard to get people to court, only for non sentences like this as an outcome.

Lalgarh · Yesterday 08:43

In Scotland, Sean Hogg, who was given a Community service order for raping a 13 year old girl was subsequently acquited

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-67076504

Sentencing guidelines in Scotland guide against giving custody to offenders under 25. The thread on the Scottish greens had some discussion on this as one of their candidates is a prison abolitionist, and this is currently on the fringe of progressive discourse particularly in America. Be interesting to see if the sentencing judge has been taking on board any of these lines of thinking, as stuff that starts on the common rooms of universities eventually ends up being implemented as policy a few decades later

Sean Hogg

Man given community sentence for rape of girl, 13, is acquitted

Sean Hogg had been found guilty by a jury of attacking the girl twice in Midlothian in 2018.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-67076504

chipsticksmammy · Yesterday 09:01

I despair. It’s not about age, rehabilitation, SEN or criminalisation of children.

Do we think these people deserve to be walking the streets? Mixing with our daughters, working along side them, sitting next to you in a pub, or driving taxis late at night?

I for one do not. They will reoffend and it will only escalate from here.

Ipollita · Yesterday 09:04

Form submitted. This cannot go unchallenged.

Cartmella · Yesterday 09:13

Where is the deterrent now?
All teenage boys can now assume that they can commit armed gang rape on a teenage girl, and even film it and distribute it, with no fear of incarceration.

Ernestinepine · Yesterday 09:16

its disgusting. It’s given the message that it’s ok to sexually assault women and children:

Lalgarh · Yesterday 09:19

Cartmella · Yesterday 09:13

Where is the deterrent now?
All teenage boys can now assume that they can commit armed gang rape on a teenage girl, and even film it and distribute it, with no fear of incarceration.

What's the legal sanction for naming convicted offenders under 18, by the way?

Just thinking of the few saving graces of the Daily mail in publicly naming the suspects in the murder of Stephen Lawrence, daring them to sue

RingoJuice · Yesterday 09:25

Lalgarh · Yesterday 08:43

In Scotland, Sean Hogg, who was given a Community service order for raping a 13 year old girl was subsequently acquited

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-67076504

Sentencing guidelines in Scotland guide against giving custody to offenders under 25. The thread on the Scottish greens had some discussion on this as one of their candidates is a prison abolitionist, and this is currently on the fringe of progressive discourse particularly in America. Be interesting to see if the sentencing judge has been taking on board any of these lines of thinking, as stuff that starts on the common rooms of universities eventually ends up being implemented as policy a few decades later

This is disgusting.

i cannot understand why people think a 20+ year old should not be jailed for rape? Isn’t this the age group that commits the most rape, by far?

I cannot understand their mindset. It’s just so sickening.

WerzMyHedAt · Yesterday 09:31

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/05/2026 14:59

It wasn’t a deterrent to stop them in the first place was it? They surely knew rape comes with a jail sentence they certainly didn’t know what their outcome would be

They thought they would get away with it.

And they did.

WerzMyHedAt · Yesterday 09:33

Lalgarh · Yesterday 08:43

In Scotland, Sean Hogg, who was given a Community service order for raping a 13 year old girl was subsequently acquited

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-67076504

Sentencing guidelines in Scotland guide against giving custody to offenders under 25. The thread on the Scottish greens had some discussion on this as one of their candidates is a prison abolitionist, and this is currently on the fringe of progressive discourse particularly in America. Be interesting to see if the sentencing judge has been taking on board any of these lines of thinking, as stuff that starts on the common rooms of universities eventually ends up being implemented as policy a few decades later

W.t.f.

WearyAuldWumman · Yesterday 09:34

RingoJuice · Yesterday 06:04

they will be 18 by the time they finish these orders and have time to mature and learn consequences and understand why they should never repeat this behaviour. It may not feel like justice as saying lock them up ‘feels’ more justified. But in reality it is just not as effective at preventing this happening again

These children will never learn that, they laughed and taunted these girls, threatened one with a knife. The most effective way to prevent this from happening again is to put them in prison and don’t let them out until they are old

I agree. In the Snaddon case, he first offended when he was 16. He was of low intellect, but was able to plan his crime.

He committed the crime at a time when custodial sentences were still being issued to those under the age of 25, but his youth was taken into consideration and he pled guilty to a lesser sentence.

Upon release, he befriended another vulnerable victim and repeated his attack. The second time round, it was acknowledged that he lacked the capacity to understand the impact of his actions on others and he was locked up in an institution for the criminally insane. He's unlikely to leave.

If the boys in the case acted because of a lack of intellect, then they're not safe around the general public.

As others have said, they had the capacity to plan their crimes. They 'just' lack the capacity to care about others.

WearyAuldWumman · Yesterday 09:36

RingoJuice · Yesterday 09:25

This is disgusting.

i cannot understand why people think a 20+ year old should not be jailed for rape? Isn’t this the age group that commits the most rape, by far?

I cannot understand their mindset. It’s just so sickening.

The ridiculous argument is that your brain isn't fully developed until you're 25. I wonder, then, that they allow people to go to uni at 18 and to become teachers in their early 20s.

WerzMyHedAt · Yesterday 09:40

WearyAuldWumman · Yesterday 09:34

I agree. In the Snaddon case, he first offended when he was 16. He was of low intellect, but was able to plan his crime.

He committed the crime at a time when custodial sentences were still being issued to those under the age of 25, but his youth was taken into consideration and he pled guilty to a lesser sentence.

Upon release, he befriended another vulnerable victim and repeated his attack. The second time round, it was acknowledged that he lacked the capacity to understand the impact of his actions on others and he was locked up in an institution for the criminally insane. He's unlikely to leave.

If the boys in the case acted because of a lack of intellect, then they're not safe around the general public.

As others have said, they had the capacity to plan their crimes. They 'just' lack the capacity to care about others.

Yes, boys who have behaved in such an evil way are 100% a lost cause.

Might not be their fault they ended up that way.

But that's the fact of it. They will never be decent and we shouldn't have to allow them a second chance to ruin someone else's life, or worse.

Bunnycat101 · Yesterday 09:46

There is a massive difference between young people doing something a bit silly (aka stealing a traffic cone or getting a bit drunk) due to immaturity and planning a heinous crime. A gang rape isn’t in the former category. These young men knew what they were doing and there is no grey area here re consent.

Lalgarh · Yesterday 09:46

WerzMyHedAt · Yesterday 09:33

W.t.f.

Oh yeah. In the wake of Black Lives Matter quite a lot of US democratic hopefuls signed up to not just Defund the Police but abolition of prisons because all crime is caused by poverty and also racial aspects. (Nb I've not seen anything that suggests the attackers here are from an ethnic minority group)

https://nitter.net/skaushik100/status/2053336261721817287#m

Rapists don't need prison but just to um, change, as men, used to be the stock response

https://nitter.net/ZaidJilani/status/2053281396962075095#m

Lalgarh · Yesterday 09:47

Bunnycat101 · Yesterday 09:46

There is a massive difference between young people doing something a bit silly (aka stealing a traffic cone or getting a bit drunk) due to immaturity and planning a heinous crime. A gang rape isn’t in the former category. These young men knew what they were doing and there is no grey area here re consent.

And they didn't just do it once but twice. Likely more times

Foreverautumnagain · Yesterday 09:49

I've submitted an unduly lenient form. The boys are unnamed, it was Southampton Crown Court on 21st May 2026. I urge others to do the same. These poor girls, and possibly others too frightened to come forward, deserve better than this.

shinysabre · Yesterday 10:05

Link to the form

Mention the place of the attacks - Fordingbridge
Mention the Judge's name - Judge Nicholas Rowland

The Sentencing Act 2020 (SA 2020) is the main statute governing sentencing in England and Wales. It consolidates and reforms sentencing law that previously was scattered across multiple statutes dating back decades.

Key provisions:

  • Purposes of sentencing (s.57): Punishment, reduction of crime, reform and rehabilitation, protection of the public, reparation to victims

Ask for a Crown Court sentence to be reviewed

How to complain to the Attorney General's Office if you think someone's sentence is too low - and what happens if the Court of Appeal get involved

https://www.gov.uk/ask-crown-court-sentence-review

shinysabre · Yesterday 10:07

The place of the attacks - Fordingbridge
The Judge's name - Judge Nicholas Rowland

The Sentencing Act 2020 (SA 2020) is the main statute governing sentencing in England and Wales.

Key provisions:

  • Purposes of sentencing (s.57): Punishment, reduction of crime, reform and rehabilitation, protection of the public, reparation to victims
MontyDonsBlueScarf · Yesterday 10:14

I live in this area. I have written to my MP saying that girls here deserve to feel safe, so this decision needs to be reviewed. Hopefully he will agree and his voice will carry particular weight.

RapunzelHadExtensions · Yesterday 10:22

MontyDonsBlueScarf · Yesterday 10:14

I live in this area. I have written to my MP saying that girls here deserve to feel safe, so this decision needs to be reviewed. Hopefully he will agree and his voice will carry particular weight.

I requested my MP contacted him to raise it directly with him. She's great so hopefully he'll feel a bit of pressure to act.

Thank you for sharing, OP.

EvieBB · Yesterday 10:29

Brunts12 · Yesterday 06:40

Sure. However, the research you are referring to is largely relates to lower-level and non-violent offending. The evidence base for community disposals being more effective than custody specifically in cases of serious, premeditated, group sexual violence involving weapons is considerably thinner. Citing general rehabilitation research to justify this specific outcome is a stretch.
You say 'what people want simply does not exist within the law' and that is precisely the point many of us are making! Perhaps it should. If the law cannot provide a proportionate response to ten rape convictions involving a knife, filmed group assaults and two separate victims, then the law needs examining. That is not ignorance of how the system works. That is a legitimate democratic argument about whether the system is fit for purpose.
Nobody in this thread is calling for vengeance. We are questioning whether a non-custodial sentence adequately reflects the gravity of what was done to two teenage girls. Those are not the same thing, and conflating them doesn't strengthen your argument.

Absolutely spot on! 👏👏

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 10:36

WearyAuldWumman · Yesterday 09:36

The ridiculous argument is that your brain isn't fully developed until you're 25. I wonder, then, that they allow people to go to uni at 18 and to become teachers in their early 20s.

Quite, but the Scottish Gov think you can change your sex from 16 (luckily this was blocked). Via my job I’ve heard young male criminals say to me ‘but I’m under 25, I’m no getting any jail’. When jail is exactly where they should be. They know nothing will happen to them. So depressing.