I’d assumed you meant female health care from this comment I have no idea why any man would seek to train in this job and think it’s shocking that the NHS would allow it.**
That doesn’t add any useful meaning to your statement below:
Sonography is not gynaecology.
Funnily enough - I know that sonography isn’t gynaecology - how mad is that? While you were accusing me of being ‘woefully misinformed’ you might have missed the fact that sonographers specialise in different areas. These men choose to specialise in women’s health areas.
but unfortunately it’s not only female healthcare where women have been harmed by male physicians.
I’m not suggesting it’s the only area or that the majority of abuse cases are by a man in the home but that doesn’t mean we should make it easier for men to target women in specific scenarios. Most stranger assaults are by opportunists. They also look for situations that give them plausible deniability.
Hyperbole isn’t going to achieve that.
Nothing I said was ‘hyperbole’ but real cases, At least you’re consistent in doubling down on your dismissal of the risks to women and their experiences. Just wave those away.
Everything has a risk, it’s not whether any rapes or sexual assaults are acceptable, it’s about balancing those risks.
Exactly what ‘balance’ are you hoping to be achieved? There are no measurable benefits to women to have male medical staff trained in female healthcare instead of females.
Are you thinking about the benefits to men? More jobs available to them, maybe a nicer working environment, and for the small number, a ready stream of victims to sexually assault while claiming plausible deniability as it is literally his job. And some women are arguing for that to be enabled. 🤯