Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to suggest emailing Andy Burnham about access to women’s toilets?

239 replies

UnDeuxTwuh · 20/05/2026 13:24

Aibu to suggest you can email Andy Burnham if you are what he calls one of the “tiny, tiny, tiny number of people” who believe that men including “transgender women” should not be allowed to use women’s toilets.

[email protected]

Perhaps if he gets enough emails he’ll see he is not right.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Wearenotborg · 21/05/2026 09:46

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 08:35

I mean, they aren’t, but don’t let bigotry stop you.

Public spaces with transpeople would be safe, because the threat is overwhelmingly people women know. Which part are you not getting, exactly?

So if a public space has a trans person in it, it’s automatically safe? Really? So how about we employ transpeople to stand in every public space and then there’d be no violence or crime would there?

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 21/05/2026 09:50

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 08:31

Do try and keep up dear. It’s not just transwomen who are put at risk - anyone who doesn’t fit the performative gender construct is affected. Look at the number of short haired lesbians who have been on the receiving end of abuse, for example, for going into the women’s toilets, as have several women with facial hair due to PCOS. And if a masculine presenting transman tries to use the ladies’, as dictated by his biological sex, I bet you’d be the first to be up in arms that there was someone who looked like a man in the ladies’. And what’s to stop biological men who did want to get into the ladies’ from just saying they’re a transman? Will you have
someone checking genitalia on the doors? What about intersex people - where would you like them to go? How about children too young to go on their own who happen to look older than their age? My DS is only 8 but already taller than most 13 year olds. He has a learning disability so cannot go in alone and cannot wait if the disabled isn’t free.

I’ll take minor embarrassment of masculine women over preventing this thanks. How bizarre that you wouldn’t.https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/14674350/trans-paedo-supermarket-toilet-ruling/

My girl was preyed on by trans paedo - ‘woman’ ruling is breath of fresh air

THE mum of a schoolgirl preyed on by a notorious trans paedo in a supermarket loo has hailed the Supreme Court ruling on women as a “breath of fresh air”. Her daughter was only ten when she was pus…

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/14674350/trans-paedo-supermarket-toilet-ruling/

Witchcraftandhokum · 21/05/2026 09:52

YANBU, in the same way I'm not unreasonable for agreeing with him

TheKeatingFive · 21/05/2026 09:59

Witchcraftandhokum · 21/05/2026 09:52

YANBU, in the same way I'm not unreasonable for agreeing with him

Agreeing with him about what precisely?

caringcarer · 21/05/2026 10:00

Francine84 · 20/05/2026 21:25

I think it’s of great importance. But MEN are the biggest threat to the safety of women and girls, not trans people. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a bigoted, narrow-minded transphobe

Anyone with a penis is a threat to women and girls do should not be allowed access to women only areas.

BunfightBetty · 21/05/2026 10:38

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 08:31

Do try and keep up dear. It’s not just transwomen who are put at risk - anyone who doesn’t fit the performative gender construct is affected. Look at the number of short haired lesbians who have been on the receiving end of abuse, for example, for going into the women’s toilets, as have several women with facial hair due to PCOS. And if a masculine presenting transman tries to use the ladies’, as dictated by his biological sex, I bet you’d be the first to be up in arms that there was someone who looked like a man in the ladies’. And what’s to stop biological men who did want to get into the ladies’ from just saying they’re a transman? Will you have
someone checking genitalia on the doors? What about intersex people - where would you like them to go? How about children too young to go on their own who happen to look older than their age? My DS is only 8 but already taller than most 13 year olds. He has a learning disability so cannot go in alone and cannot wait if the disabled isn’t free.

Woah, had somebody transported me back to 2021? These are the sort of entry-level juvenile attempts at ‘gotchas’ that were easily demolished by the application of a modicum of critical thinking way back then.

Where have you been that you think any of this is a reasonable point?

jeaux90 · 21/05/2026 10:39

TheKeatingFive · 21/05/2026 09:14

If men actually ARE assaulting other men in men's toilets, because of how they present, that's appalling behaviour.

So why is the focus not on addressing this?

Why are people so intent on making it a woman's problem to fix instead?

Because women and girls are human shields, support humans etc and our safety and dignity is supposed to not matter. Male performance of femininity trumps all!

BunfightBetty · 21/05/2026 11:01

TheKeatingFive · 21/05/2026 09:14

If men actually ARE assaulting other men in men's toilets, because of how they present, that's appalling behaviour.

So why is the focus not on addressing this?

Why are people so intent on making it a woman's problem to fix instead?

Because the men's rights misogynists and useful idiots with suicidal empathy think we're everyone's mummies.

We can't possibly say 'no' to men. And we can't possibly tell them to take responsibility and sort their own shit out.

Oh noo, it's our job - apparently - to make everyone happy. And if that's at the expense of our own safety, wellbeing and happiness, well.... so what? Who gives a shit. We're only female. We don't count, our needs come last.

Not all of us are that fucking stupid, though.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 21/05/2026 11:21

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 08:31

Do try and keep up dear. It’s not just transwomen who are put at risk - anyone who doesn’t fit the performative gender construct is affected. Look at the number of short haired lesbians who have been on the receiving end of abuse, for example, for going into the women’s toilets, as have several women with facial hair due to PCOS. And if a masculine presenting transman tries to use the ladies’, as dictated by his biological sex, I bet you’d be the first to be up in arms that there was someone who looked like a man in the ladies’. And what’s to stop biological men who did want to get into the ladies’ from just saying they’re a transman? Will you have
someone checking genitalia on the doors? What about intersex people - where would you like them to go? How about children too young to go on their own who happen to look older than their age? My DS is only 8 but already taller than most 13 year olds. He has a learning disability so cannot go in alone and cannot wait if the disabled isn’t free.

It’s not just transwomen who are put at risk

Men who call themselves women are have no more risk to their safety than any other man.

Look at the number of short haired lesbians who have been on the receiving end of abuse,

I’m guessing it’s just a wild coincidence that the main reports of this totally not made up scenario are either Stonewall employees or other trans activists.

I have encountered many short haired women (I don’t ask them their sexual preferences though) in the ladies toilets. Some of them even wear quite man style clothing. They are obviously still women though….

And if a masculine presenting transman tries to use the ladies’, as dictated by his biological sex

It’s very rare for them to be remotely convincing with a very high incidence of womanly hips and squeaky voices. My great aunt had rather a spikey beard - still obviously a woman though.

And what’s to stop biological men who did want to get into the ladies’ from just saying they’re a transman?

Because away from trans fantasyland, it doesn’t work like that. And no man could pass as a woman trying to look like a man 🙄

Will you have someone checking genitalia on the doors?

Seriously? You’ve wheeled out that old chestnut?? Everyone knows what sex they are. If you think that men who identify as woman are incapable of following basic rules designed for the privacy and dignity of women (not men who call themselves woman) then that’s on you and them. We can have them removed or banned or reported to the police for voyeurism.

What about intersex people - where would you like them to go?

You really are chucking the kitchen sink at this one 🤣. ‘Intersex’ people (the inoffensive term is people with DSDs but I don’t expect you to respect them either) are still either male or female but are either male with abnormalities for their sex or female with abnormalities for their sex. Most DSD conditions are not even visible, it’s just a private medical matter and they can use the spaces for their sex.

Anyway, none of your ridiculous points are remotely relevant. The law says women have a right to single sex spaces for our safety and dignity. No men are allowed in those spaces, even if they say they are women. If you don’t like I’m afraid that’s tough.

JustTryingToBeMe · 21/05/2026 11:24

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 20/05/2026 21:17

I don't have a problem with transgender people. I have a trans-identified family member and we get along just fine, although I don't agree with the reasoning behind it.

What I want, and what I have a right to insist upon, is no male people of any presentation or ilk in lawful, female single-sex spaces (not just toilets, but also medical and care situations, etc.)

This matters to me. You clearly don't care, but if your elderly mother wanted a female carer for intimate care and was refused this because it made her a "bigot", my guess is you would change your tune pretty quickly.

Edited

this, a thousand times

Livpool · 21/05/2026 12:40

Endoadnowarrior · 21/05/2026 01:47

Absolutely THIS!
The danger really is from gender conforming men!!!

Where exactly are trans people supposed to use the toilet?

Because trans women will be at risk in the gents, and trans men (and also "butch"; androgynous or "tomboy" women!) will make women feel unsafe in ladies because they far more often look male than obviously trans.

So do we then somehow need to provide seperate spaces for trans men and trans women, without making them sitting ducks for violence and harassment?

It seems thats exactly what the anti-trans brigade actually want, and exactly what is happening in the name of "protecting women's hard won rights". It's punching down and using trans people as protection from predators and bigots - like human shields- rather than addressing the issue of the predators and bigots!

Edited

Actually - you and a lot of TRAs are actually using women to protect trans women/gender non-conforming males from other men. Women are the human shields. Deal with males and how they treat trans-identified males and gender non—conforming males. This is a male problem to sort.

Alucard55 · 21/05/2026 12:59

Endoadnowarrior · 21/05/2026 01:47

Absolutely THIS!
The danger really is from gender conforming men!!!

Where exactly are trans people supposed to use the toilet?

Because trans women will be at risk in the gents, and trans men (and also "butch"; androgynous or "tomboy" women!) will make women feel unsafe in ladies because they far more often look male than obviously trans.

So do we then somehow need to provide seperate spaces for trans men and trans women, without making them sitting ducks for violence and harassment?

It seems thats exactly what the anti-trans brigade actually want, and exactly what is happening in the name of "protecting women's hard won rights". It's punching down and using trans people as protection from predators and bigots - like human shields- rather than addressing the issue of the predators and bigots!

Edited

We just want men to stay out of women's single sex spaces. That includes the good and decent men. All men need to stay out.

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 14:09

Bless, look at them all getting so worked up. 🙄 You WON. You got your ruling. Your god and saviour Robert Galbraith smoked their cigar. And yet you’re not happy. It’s almost as if excluding transpeople isn’t a magic solution to all women’s problems….

Answer me this - the ruling was put into effect in summer 2025. That’s a year. Has there been a reduction in violence against women? No. Has there been a reduction in rape and sexual assault against women? No. Has there been a rise in hate crimes and hate speech against transpeople? Yes. So women are no better off, and the marginalised are more vulnerable. How, exactly, does this improve society?

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 21/05/2026 14:23

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 14:09

Bless, look at them all getting so worked up. 🙄 You WON. You got your ruling. Your god and saviour Robert Galbraith smoked their cigar. And yet you’re not happy. It’s almost as if excluding transpeople isn’t a magic solution to all women’s problems….

Answer me this - the ruling was put into effect in summer 2025. That’s a year. Has there been a reduction in violence against women? No. Has there been a reduction in rape and sexual assault against women? No. Has there been a rise in hate crimes and hate speech against transpeople? Yes. So women are no better off, and the marginalised are more vulnerable. How, exactly, does this improve society?

The ruling had NOT been put into effect. The vast majority have been waiting for the guidance to be released.

But yes. We are delighted with the Supreme Court ruling. It’ll just take a bit of time and maybe some legal cases to get the message through.

I am very much enjoying the TRA meltdowns.

RhannionKPSS · 21/05/2026 14:25

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 14:09

Bless, look at them all getting so worked up. 🙄 You WON. You got your ruling. Your god and saviour Robert Galbraith smoked their cigar. And yet you’re not happy. It’s almost as if excluding transpeople isn’t a magic solution to all women’s problems….

Answer me this - the ruling was put into effect in summer 2025. That’s a year. Has there been a reduction in violence against women? No. Has there been a reduction in rape and sexual assault against women? No. Has there been a rise in hate crimes and hate speech against transpeople? Yes. So women are no better off, and the marginalised are more vulnerable. How, exactly, does this improve society?

We women got the law clarified, that’s what we got. It was never legal for men to use women’s single sex spaces It’s Stonewall etc you should be having a go at for lying about the law.

TheKeatingFive · 21/05/2026 14:56

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 14:09

Bless, look at them all getting so worked up. 🙄 You WON. You got your ruling. Your god and saviour Robert Galbraith smoked their cigar. And yet you’re not happy. It’s almost as if excluding transpeople isn’t a magic solution to all women’s problems….

Answer me this - the ruling was put into effect in summer 2025. That’s a year. Has there been a reduction in violence against women? No. Has there been a reduction in rape and sexual assault against women? No. Has there been a rise in hate crimes and hate speech against transpeople? Yes. So women are no better off, and the marginalised are more vulnerable. How, exactly, does this improve society?

Can you simply explain to us all why you don't think women's rights to single sex spaces are important/worthy of respect?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/05/2026 15:20

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 14:09

Bless, look at them all getting so worked up. 🙄 You WON. You got your ruling. Your god and saviour Robert Galbraith smoked their cigar. And yet you’re not happy. It’s almost as if excluding transpeople isn’t a magic solution to all women’s problems….

Answer me this - the ruling was put into effect in summer 2025. That’s a year. Has there been a reduction in violence against women? No. Has there been a reduction in rape and sexual assault against women? No. Has there been a rise in hate crimes and hate speech against transpeople? Yes. So women are no better off, and the marginalised are more vulnerable. How, exactly, does this improve society?

You don’t really understand what respect for women and girls means, do you? It means that sometimes we need to use spaces without any men in, even if those men aren’t definitely going to rape us. It’s very simple. Have a little think about it.

AgnesMcDoo · 21/05/2026 15:25

He’s out campaigning for the next number of months.

he will read zero emails

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 21/05/2026 15:27

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 14:09

Bless, look at them all getting so worked up. 🙄 You WON. You got your ruling. Your god and saviour Robert Galbraith smoked their cigar. And yet you’re not happy. It’s almost as if excluding transpeople isn’t a magic solution to all women’s problems….

Answer me this - the ruling was put into effect in summer 2025. That’s a year. Has there been a reduction in violence against women? No. Has there been a reduction in rape and sexual assault against women? No. Has there been a rise in hate crimes and hate speech against transpeople? Yes. So women are no better off, and the marginalised are more vulnerable. How, exactly, does this improve society?

I think of all the posters who are getting ‘worked up’, that would fall to you. Just leave our spaces alone, campaign for men to be accepting of men who think they are women into their spaces. Put your energies into that and you won’t sound so unhappy and hateful.

Lugol · 21/05/2026 15:31

Burnhams email is bouncing back.

Does anyone have an email address that works for him?

Lugol · 21/05/2026 15:34

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 14:09

Bless, look at them all getting so worked up. 🙄 You WON. You got your ruling. Your god and saviour Robert Galbraith smoked their cigar. And yet you’re not happy. It’s almost as if excluding transpeople isn’t a magic solution to all women’s problems….

Answer me this - the ruling was put into effect in summer 2025. That’s a year. Has there been a reduction in violence against women? No. Has there been a reduction in rape and sexual assault against women? No. Has there been a rise in hate crimes and hate speech against transpeople? Yes. So women are no better off, and the marginalised are more vulnerable. How, exactly, does this improve society?

You sound almost jubilant in your post that crimes against women haven't reduced (I haven't checked the stats but I'm assuming you've done your homework).

Please link me to your stats that back up that a rise of hate crimes have been recorded, I'd love a good read.

TheGreatDownandOut · 21/05/2026 15:58

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 01:55

Objectively, that’s simply untrue. Someone with their penis removed does not factually pose the same risk as someone with a penis when it comes to an assault.

And as the facts show, male strangers pose a very, very small risk as 90% of rape and assault victims are attacked by someone they know.

10% of rapes being committed by strangers is still 10% too many.
Have you ever thought that the reason the statistics are skewed that way is because men who are strangers to women don’t often have the opportunity to rape or assault a woman they don’t know BECAUSE single sex spaces exist?

mintirn · 21/05/2026 17:34

Francine84 · 20/05/2026 16:12

Yawnnnnnn. Why not concern yourself with something that actually matters? What harm have trans people ever done to you, or anyone? Give it a bloody rest and get a life.

Can we be clear here. You say "trans people" but in reality we are talking about males who want to be able to access female only single sex spaces.

5128gap · 21/05/2026 18:05

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 08:35

I mean, they aren’t, but don’t let bigotry stop you.

Public spaces with transpeople would be safe, because the threat is overwhelmingly people women know. Which part are you not getting, exactly?

I'm not getting how the threat to women from men they know acts as a protective factor, and makes them safe from TIM in public toilets. Could you explain how that works?

Lovelyview · 21/05/2026 19:27

PortSalutPlease · 21/05/2026 14:09

Bless, look at them all getting so worked up. 🙄 You WON. You got your ruling. Your god and saviour Robert Galbraith smoked their cigar. And yet you’re not happy. It’s almost as if excluding transpeople isn’t a magic solution to all women’s problems….

Answer me this - the ruling was put into effect in summer 2025. That’s a year. Has there been a reduction in violence against women? No. Has there been a reduction in rape and sexual assault against women? No. Has there been a rise in hate crimes and hate speech against transpeople? Yes. So women are no better off, and the marginalised are more vulnerable. How, exactly, does this improve society?

I am considerably better off now I don't have to encounter a man who identifies as a woman in the female changing rooms. The EHRC guidance will finally allow women to get men out of women's spaces.