Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To start to think reform will be voted in next time, and they will be running the country

973 replies

Whatdoyouthinktothis · 03/05/2026 10:37

I’ve been a life long labour voter, but I’m starting to think reform will be elected next time
mainly just due to so many criminals that want to harm us being allowed in and allowed to stay
and uncontrolled immigration

I think they are going to win it on this reason alone
every single day there’s a news story usually more than one someone’s been raped by one of these criminals one the other day even said he didn’t understand what rape is and he thought rape was just sex

what do you all think ?
Will reform be running the country soon ?
if they are are the capable of running things in other areas ?
if they take over how do you see that actually panning out ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
TopPocketFind · 05/05/2026 16:29

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 16:23

Oh I see, to earn money to pay for education taxes. Great idea.

I thought it might be the Tories fault, you’re absolutely right

I am glad you agree, the statistics are easy to find.

And if you are struggling with private education tax, there are state schools available.

cardibach · 05/05/2026 16:32

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 16:29

No not really, the question was what percentage of children would mean it’s not a minority (or understatement of minority) issue? 10, 15%?

That it’s a minority issue isn’t the only reason. I’ve said that at least 3 times now. That multiplies its lack of importance. But I don’t think it’s important that some people pay a tax because they’ve chosen a particular luxury version of education. I don’t care. It’s not important to me as an issue never mind how many it involved.
But this is a silly argument anyway. It’s a small number because only a small number coukd afford it in the first place. There is no scenario where a high percentage of people can afford independent education. It’s a hypothetical you are using to try to suggest I’m biased or uncaring or something when actually it’s just that I don’t find this issue important. You do. I get that. But I don’t.

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 16:42

TopPocketFind · 05/05/2026 16:29

I am glad you agree, the statistics are easy to find.

And if you are struggling with private education tax, there are state schools available.

Edited

What statistics am I looking for?

Yes you’re right, it’s worth noting that this education tax only applies to non tax payer funded children’s education options.

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 16:48

cardibach · 05/05/2026 16:32

That it’s a minority issue isn’t the only reason. I’ve said that at least 3 times now. That multiplies its lack of importance. But I don’t think it’s important that some people pay a tax because they’ve chosen a particular luxury version of education. I don’t care. It’s not important to me as an issue never mind how many it involved.
But this is a silly argument anyway. It’s a small number because only a small number coukd afford it in the first place. There is no scenario where a high percentage of people can afford independent education. It’s a hypothetical you are using to try to suggest I’m biased or uncaring or something when actually it’s just that I don’t find this issue important. You do. I get that. But I don’t.

Well it’s 7% of children, what percentage of children wouldn’t be considered a small number? It’s pretty straight forward question. It’s a number

cardibach · 05/05/2026 16:50

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 16:48

Well it’s 7% of children, what percentage of children wouldn’t be considered a small number? It’s pretty straight forward question. It’s a number

7% of school aged children. And how many times and ways can I say that isn’t the only reason I’m not interested. Why are you fixated on that? It is 7%. That’s a fact. So hypotheticals are irrelevant.

TopPocketFind · 05/05/2026 16:53

cardibach · 05/05/2026 16:50

7% of school aged children. And how many times and ways can I say that isn’t the only reason I’m not interested. Why are you fixated on that? It is 7%. That’s a fact. So hypotheticals are irrelevant.

It's the same with the reluctance to add 'private' to their education tax.

You can fill a thread with it, going round in circles.

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 16:57

cardibach · 05/05/2026 16:50

7% of school aged children. And how many times and ways can I say that isn’t the only reason I’m not interested. Why are you fixated on that? It is 7%. That’s a fact. So hypotheticals are irrelevant.

Because you keep saying it’s a minority issue and a small amount children, I just want to know at what percentage point of children affected by a policy it’s worth taking note. I don’t know why you’re struggling so much, it’s less than 1% for me.

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 16:59

TopPocketFind · 05/05/2026 16:53

It's the same with the reluctance to add 'private' to their education tax.

You can fill a thread with it, going round in circles.

I had no say in the name of the policy, I think most people would understand that 20% of 0 is 0.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-on-education-and-vocational-training-notice-70130

Education and vocational training (VAT Notice 701/30)

Find out how VAT applies to education, research, vocational training, examination services and goods and services connected with these activities.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-on-education-and-vocational-training-notice-70130

TopPocketFind · 05/05/2026 17:02

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 16:59

I had no say in the name of the policy, I think most people would understand that 20% of 0 is 0.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-on-education-and-vocational-training-notice-70130

Here from the overview alone

Since 1 January 2025, all education services and vocational training provided by private schools in the UK for a charge have been subject to VAT at the standard rate of 20%. This also applies to boarding services provided by private schools.

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 17:03

I completely get what you’re saying, it’s obvious from that article that a children’s education tax was needed urgently.

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 17:06

TopPocketFind · 05/05/2026 17:02

Here from the overview alone

Since 1 January 2025, all education services and vocational training provided by private schools in the UK for a charge have been subject to VAT at the standard rate of 20%. This also applies to boarding services provided by private schools.

Yes, it’s only on non tax payer funded children’s education and vocational training options. 20% of 0 is 0.

cardibach · 05/05/2026 19:18

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 16:57

Because you keep saying it’s a minority issue and a small amount children, I just want to know at what percentage point of children affected by a policy it’s worth taking note. I don’t know why you’re struggling so much, it’s less than 1% for me.

Edited

There isn’t a percentage because I’m not interested in hypotheticals.

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 19:40

cardibach · 05/05/2026 19:18

There isn’t a percentage because I’m not interested in hypotheticals.

Oh I know. I understand the mentality, as do the electorate judging by polls,

cardibach · 05/05/2026 19:47

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 19:40

Oh I know. I understand the mentality, as do the electorate judging by polls,

What mentality?
The fact is 7% of school chikdren go private. It’s a minority issue. It’s never going to be materially more than that, so banging on and on about ‘what if it was 10/20/50%’ is nonsense. We’d be in a totally different world if that was the case.

EasternStandard · 05/05/2026 19:53

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 19:40

Oh I know. I understand the mentality, as do the electorate judging by polls,

If it doesn’t bring in funding as in pp what’s the point of it anyway. Make some people feel good that dc have to leave friends and some schools close. Sounds like negatives.

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 20:04

cardibach · 05/05/2026 19:47

What mentality?
The fact is 7% of school chikdren go private. It’s a minority issue. It’s never going to be materially more than that, so banging on and on about ‘what if it was 10/20/50%’ is nonsense. We’d be in a totally different world if that was the case.

You don’t have to keep trying to justify yourself , I understand why you can’t answer the question and your mentality.

OneTealShaker · 05/05/2026 20:08

To those bashing Reform, you don’t need to worry about Reform. You need to worry about what comes after Reform if Reform fail.

cardibach · 05/05/2026 20:11

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 20:04

You don’t have to keep trying to justify yourself , I understand why you can’t answer the question and your mentality.

I’m not ‘justifying’ anything. That’s nonsense and you know it.
Again, what mentality? If you understand it so well, please explain it to me as I have absolutely no idea what you mean.

TopPocketFind · 05/05/2026 20:13

OneTealShaker · 05/05/2026 20:08

To those bashing Reform, you don’t need to worry about Reform. You need to worry about what comes after Reform if Reform fail.

To clean up Reform's mess?

Teal is Reform's colour isn't it?

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 20:19

cardibach · 05/05/2026 20:11

I’m not ‘justifying’ anything. That’s nonsense and you know it.
Again, what mentality? If you understand it so well, please explain it to me as I have absolutely no idea what you mean.

LOL of course you don’t. It’s ok, you don’t have to explain yourself anymore.

cardibach · 05/05/2026 20:26

IRodeIn · 05/05/2026 20:19

LOL of course you don’t. It’s ok, you don’t have to explain yourself anymore.

But you do, please. Saying something about ‘my mentality’ without describing what you mean is pretty unpleasant. Bit personal. I’d like an explanation.

Pedallleur · 05/05/2026 20:35

Hallowedturf · 05/05/2026 16:08

Curious, given the damage inflicted on some children who have been forced to leave private education.

forced to leave because their parents couldn't afford the fees or because the schools were poorly managed, falling numbers, fees rising + vat?

JHound · 05/05/2026 20:39

IRodeIn · 04/05/2026 16:34

Yes with the service in question being children’s education.

I know what a school is.

But incurring that cost is completely down to choice. There is a completely free alternative.

Hallowedturf · 05/05/2026 21:04

Pedallleur · 05/05/2026 20:35

forced to leave because their parents couldn't afford the fees or because the schools were poorly managed, falling numbers, fees rising + vat?

Edited

Withdrawn bursaries.

Swipe left for the next trending thread