Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To start to think reform will be voted in next time, and they will be running the country

973 replies

Whatdoyouthinktothis · 03/05/2026 10:37

I’ve been a life long labour voter, but I’m starting to think reform will be elected next time
mainly just due to so many criminals that want to harm us being allowed in and allowed to stay
and uncontrolled immigration

I think they are going to win it on this reason alone
every single day there’s a news story usually more than one someone’s been raped by one of these criminals one the other day even said he didn’t understand what rape is and he thought rape was just sex

what do you all think ?
Will reform be running the country soon ?
if they are are the capable of running things in other areas ?
if they take over how do you see that actually panning out ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
Uhdf · 04/05/2026 17:02

cardibach · 04/05/2026 15:12

You understand asylum seekers are leaving because they disagree with the regimes in those countries? They aren’t all woman haters.

They don't want to live there yes. But that doesn't mean that they are culturally compatible with the west and don't have backwards views.

Hallowedturf · 04/05/2026 17:03

ilovesooty · 04/05/2026 16:52

I don't just vote on what affects me either. I'm concerned about addressing child poverty which I imagine affects more children than VAT on private school fees.

Well, at least Labour are lifting 550k children out of poverty by 2030.

Not sure what that actually means but OK.

Goldenbear · 04/05/2026 17:03

Hallowedturf · 04/05/2026 16:47

How would you like to see private health care treated?

You've misunderstood my point which is you aren't a victim if you are one of the 7% who use private schools. Equally, it's certainly not 7% who can't afford the VAT, it's a much small percentage. This was in response to why people probably don't care either way.

EasternStandard · 04/05/2026 17:03

IRodeIn · 04/05/2026 17:01

That has described the last two years of Labour perfectly.

Yes it looks like many think that.

Hallowedturf · 04/05/2026 17:06

Goldenbear · 04/05/2026 17:03

You've misunderstood my point which is you aren't a victim if you are one of the 7% who use private schools. Equally, it's certainly not 7% who can't afford the VAT, it's a much small percentage. This was in response to why people probably don't care either way.

No, I get that, thanks - some posters have deployed an argument against private schooling which would easily apply to private health, and yet they don’t mention it.

Note that PH is taxed as a BIK of course, if an employee benefit.

Uhdf · 04/05/2026 17:07

cardibach · 04/05/2026 15:17

You are using women and girls’ safety as a political tool. That upsets me. You are suddenly upset about dangers in the channel but you don’t want to enact anything that would make it less likely women and children would be there. You have probably (assumption, apologies if I’m wrong on this but others with your views have) wondered why it’s mostly young men in the boats.
Yes, some asylum seekers commit crimes, some of which are against women and girls. Nobody is excusing that or deprioritising women or any of the things you suggest. It’s wrong. But it’s not a reason to deny help to vulnerable people. The international community has a responsibility and we have a part to play in that.

So if a few British women die or get SAed, it's okay and we should just accept it?

LondonBlueTopaz · 04/05/2026 17:07

This sounds like a genuine post 🙄

Changingplace · 04/05/2026 17:08

IRodeIn · 04/05/2026 13:26

Sigh, please just read the policy again. You’ve now screenshot a list of what HMRC considers education providers that ‘are in business’ which includes universities, however university students are not paying the education and vocational tax. The tax is on educational and vocational services provided to children, paid by the children (fee payer) not private schools or any other organisation. You have the policy right in front of you. If you find this hard to believe that a government would do this, then maybe you’re starting to see why Labour is in so much trouble.

Sigh… as many people have already responded I don’t really know why I’m bothering but seems you’re still stuck in a loop on this.

But yes, paid by the private education providers, if they’ve got the funds maybe they’ll pay the extra, I doubt many will do so yes they’ve passed on the increase to the parents/guardians who are paying the private school fees that are now subject to vat.

Individual parents aren’t receiving a personal vat bill for the increase, the providers are, how they fund that is up to them.

It’s not compulsory to send your kids to private school.

State funded education options are available, so if anyone doesn’t want to pay for private school they’ve always had that option.

In the grand scheme of things that will be of interest to voters this is impacting a very small % of the population.

They/you are of course entitled to vote on this issue but I’ve never irl even heard anyone mention it, only ever on MN is it even brought up.

IRodeIn · 04/05/2026 17:20

Changingplace · 04/05/2026 17:08

Sigh… as many people have already responded I don’t really know why I’m bothering but seems you’re still stuck in a loop on this.

But yes, paid by the private education providers, if they’ve got the funds maybe they’ll pay the extra, I doubt many will do so yes they’ve passed on the increase to the parents/guardians who are paying the private school fees that are now subject to vat.

Individual parents aren’t receiving a personal vat bill for the increase, the providers are, how they fund that is up to them.

It’s not compulsory to send your kids to private school.

State funded education options are available, so if anyone doesn’t want to pay for private school they’ve always had that option.

In the grand scheme of things that will be of interest to voters this is impacting a very small % of the population.

They/you are of course entitled to vote on this issue but I’ve never irl even heard anyone mention it, only ever on MN is it even brought up.

‘But yes, paid by the private education providers’

OMG. No, it’s paid by the child or fee payer on* their *behalf. I may be stuck on a loop on this because there is such ignorance around this harmful policy. It is a tax on education and vocational training services provided specifically to children. There’s no ambiguity, that is who is paying this tax. Here is the link https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-on-education-and-vocational-training-notice-70130#overview
for the love of god please read it and have basic understanding before arguing one way or the other for it,.

Education and vocational training (VAT Notice 701/30)

Find out how VAT applies to education, research, vocational training, examination services and goods and services connected with these activities.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-on-education-and-vocational-training-notice-70130#overview

IRodeIn · 04/05/2026 17:25

Hallowedturf · 04/05/2026 17:03

Well, at least Labour are lifting 550k children out of poverty by 2030.

Not sure what that actually means but OK.

It’s usually relative poverty, so if they push unemployment up by say 1 million people with 2 children each then that’s a reduction in relative poverty. It works even better when high tax payers leave the country on mass, huge reduction in relative poverty.

Uhdf · 04/05/2026 17:27

Hallowedturf · 04/05/2026 17:03

Well, at least Labour are lifting 550k children out of poverty by 2030.

Not sure what that actually means but OK.

Benefits to feed kids 1&2 aren't enough. So they need more to feed kid 3.

Walkyrie · 04/05/2026 18:11

I mean in theory X amount of children should now actually be out of poverty because of child benefit but do we actually feel that? Nope

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 18:13

Hallowedturf · 04/05/2026 14:05

Definition.
A concentration camp is a prison or other facility used for the internment of political prisoners or politically targeted demographics, such as members of national or ethnic minority groups, on the grounds of national security, or for exploitation or punishment.

Again, please withdraw or correct, thanks.

Nah, you are still describing the detention centres Reform are promoting

frozendaisy · 04/05/2026 18:14

IRodeIn · 04/05/2026 17:01

That has described the last two years of Labour perfectly.

And it will more bigger, greater crashes with much less acknowledgment of the people they are supposed to serve. Disasters on steroids.

If the UK votes them in then we deserve it.

Walkyrie · 04/05/2026 18:15

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 18:13

Nah, you are still describing the detention centres Reform are promoting

I don’t think you mean concentration camps, I think you mean Hitler’s extermination camps. Two very different things.

IRodeIn · 04/05/2026 18:17

frozendaisy · 04/05/2026 18:14

And it will more bigger, greater crashes with much less acknowledgment of the people they are supposed to serve. Disasters on steroids.

If the UK votes them in then we deserve it.

Only one way to find out, we already know what Labour will continue to do.

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 18:17

@Whatdoyouthinktothis Any chance of contributing to your thread?

Hallowedturf · 04/05/2026 18:20

IRodeIn · 04/05/2026 18:17

Only one way to find out, we already know what Labour will continue to do.

Absolutely.

If Reform will be as terrible as some posters predict, and they are voted in - what does that say about Labour?

Hallowedturf · 04/05/2026 18:22

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 18:13

Nah, you are still describing the detention centres Reform are promoting

No, absolutely not.

Is it possible that you have made another error?

Uhdf · 04/05/2026 18:23

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 18:13

Nah, you are still describing the detention centres Reform are promoting

Nothing wrong with humanely detaining illegal migrants. ICE in the states has had detention facilities for years.

StrictlyCoffee · 04/05/2026 18:30

Given how stupid the British public are, it wouldn’t be a surprise. People who vote Reform aren’t intelligent enough to have worked out they can say what they like but have never had to actually prove themselves.

I’m hoping they win a lot of councils and fuck them up badly.

Hallowedturf · 04/05/2026 18:33

StrictlyCoffee · 04/05/2026 18:30

Given how stupid the British public are, it wouldn’t be a surprise. People who vote Reform aren’t intelligent enough to have worked out they can say what they like but have never had to actually prove themselves.

I’m hoping they win a lot of councils and fuck them up badly.

Gotta admit, that sounds more applicable to the Greens…

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 18:33

Hallowedturf · 04/05/2026 18:22

No, absolutely not.

Is it possible that you have made another error?

No

You have given the description of detention camps aka concentration camps.

Maybe read your post again?

Uhdf · 04/05/2026 18:36

Concentration camps were inhumane and killed people.

It's not the same as detain illegal entrants pending removal to their country of origin.

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 18:37

Uhdf · 04/05/2026 18:23

Nothing wrong with humanely detaining illegal migrants. ICE in the states has had detention facilities for years.

Do you admire ICE in their current form? Alligator Alcatraz?

Killing protestors, arresting people withour due process?

Is that what you want in the UK?

That is what Reform seems to be basing their policies on.

Farage is a Trump fan.