Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To start to think reform will be voted in next time, and they will be running the country

973 replies

Whatdoyouthinktothis · 03/05/2026 10:37

I’ve been a life long labour voter, but I’m starting to think reform will be elected next time
mainly just due to so many criminals that want to harm us being allowed in and allowed to stay
and uncontrolled immigration

I think they are going to win it on this reason alone
every single day there’s a news story usually more than one someone’s been raped by one of these criminals one the other day even said he didn’t understand what rape is and he thought rape was just sex

what do you all think ?
Will reform be running the country soon ?
if they are are the capable of running things in other areas ?
if they take over how do you see that actually panning out ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 10:19

Somerford · 04/05/2026 09:56

Its a sound investment if it saves you many billions in the long run.

Not if you cannot deport people.

Unless you really think we should send Iranian women back to Iran and Aghan women to Afghanistan

Reform did once propose paying the Taliban and IRGC to take refugees back

EasternStandard · 04/05/2026 10:19

Changingplace · 04/05/2026 10:18

Edit: wrong post!

Edited

Is there a reason you can post here but not type it into search?

Somerford · 04/05/2026 10:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Greyblankie · 04/05/2026 10:22

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 10:19

Not if you cannot deport people.

Unless you really think we should send Iranian women back to Iran and Aghan women to Afghanistan

Reform did once propose paying the Taliban and IRGC to take refugees back

The Rwanda scheme would have worked had it not been for the ECHR but that won’t be a problem under a reform government will it?

GiaGia16 · 04/05/2026 10:26

BIossomtoes · 04/05/2026 09:59

But we don’t spend billions on asylum seekers.

We do.

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 10:27

Greyblankie · 04/05/2026 10:22

The Rwanda scheme would have worked had it not been for the ECHR but that won’t be a problem under a reform government will it?

You are happy to see concentration camps in the UK, got it

Greyblankie · 04/05/2026 10:32

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 10:27

You are happy to see concentration camps in the UK, got it

They don’t have to come here illegally 🤷‍♀️

cardibach · 04/05/2026 10:38

Greyblankie · 04/05/2026 10:15

In the long run … probably less than we spend on housing and feeding illegals immigrants for years on end. Plus money will be saved on the scrapping of benefits for foreign nationals.

You only think you need to feed and house asylum seekers for years on end because that’s what the Tories enacted to allow them to blame everything on immigration. If you process efficiently it doesn’t need to be long at all. And for occasions when it takes a bit longer -letting them work would reduce the spend.

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 10:39

Greyblankie · 04/05/2026 10:32

They don’t have to come here illegally 🤷‍♀️

In most cases they do as there are no legal safe routes.

Braverman was once asked how a 16-year-old orphan from an "East African country" escaping a war zone with a sibling in the UK could get to the UK safely and legally.

She could not answer this question.

cardibach · 04/05/2026 10:40

Greyblankie · 04/05/2026 10:22

The Rwanda scheme would have worked had it not been for the ECHR but that won’t be a problem under a reform government will it?

It was for a few hundred and was reciprocal - we’d agreed to take a similar number of the most vulnerable refugees from Rwanda. It wasn’t any kind of solution.

EasternStandard · 04/05/2026 10:41

cardibach · 04/05/2026 10:38

You only think you need to feed and house asylum seekers for years on end because that’s what the Tories enacted to allow them to blame everything on immigration. If you process efficiently it doesn’t need to be long at all. And for occasions when it takes a bit longer -letting them work would reduce the spend.

Labour are in now and their policies have made it even harder for women and girls. Almost impossible, plus higher risk hence the recent crush.

cardibach · 04/05/2026 10:42

EasternStandard · 04/05/2026 10:41

Labour are in now and their policies have made it even harder for women and girls. Almost impossible, plus higher risk hence the recent crush.

I’m not sure what you mean. Immigration is down. Boat crossings are down.

JHound · 04/05/2026 10:43

Whatdoyouthinktothis · 03/05/2026 10:37

I’ve been a life long labour voter, but I’m starting to think reform will be elected next time
mainly just due to so many criminals that want to harm us being allowed in and allowed to stay
and uncontrolled immigration

I think they are going to win it on this reason alone
every single day there’s a news story usually more than one someone’s been raped by one of these criminals one the other day even said he didn’t understand what rape is and he thought rape was just sex

what do you all think ?
Will reform be running the country soon ?
if they are are the capable of running things in other areas ?
if they take over how do you see that actually panning out ?

You have just started to think that?

My predictions are:

a) They will win
b) They will be a car crash
c) The people who voted for them will deny any accountability and blame Labour (and a smaller number - The Tories) for their decision.

It will be Brexit 2.0.

JHound · 04/05/2026 10:45

think they are going to win it on this reason alone
every single day there’s a news story usually more than one someone’s been raped by one of these criminals one the other day even said he didn’t understand what rape is and he thought rape was just sex

When was this? I also doubt the man genuinely thought that. I doubt rape is legal in his country (marital rape being the sole exception that is still legal in many places.)

EasternStandard · 04/05/2026 10:45

cardibach · 04/05/2026 10:42

I’m not sure what you mean. Immigration is down. Boat crossings are down.

It’s like a mantra. Did you miss the recent deaths in the Channel? Labour have ended family reunification therefore more women and girls will try by boat. They are overcrowded, they were crushed, it’s riskier due to Labour’s polices.

JHound · 04/05/2026 10:46

CitizenZ · 03/05/2026 10:57

We live in a country where our media is only interested in letting us know what crimes immigrants and POC are committing, and casually keeping quiet about the majority of crimes being committed by home grown white folk. And the fools buy into their agenda.

This is unfortunately true. All parts of the media are also complicit in this sadly. Not just the traditional parts you expect this from.

JHound · 04/05/2026 10:47

EasternStandard · 04/05/2026 10:45

It’s like a mantra. Did you miss the recent deaths in the Channel? Labour have ended family reunification therefore more women and girls will try by boat. They are overcrowded, they were crushed, it’s riskier due to Labour’s polices.

So you think it was wrong to stop family reunification?

climbintheback · 04/05/2026 10:47

Figures are difficult and complicated but some from Govt sites include
£4bn to 2029 to Serco and such for hotels
£5.6m a day for feeding and servicing illegal immigrants
£2bn for Afghan resettlement
Then I suppose add on Border Force, Prisons, Courts, education, NHS etc where does it stop and please don’t shoot the messenger and feel free to add or subtract it was just a brief Google and as the Govt doesn’t know exactly how many are here it’s a difficult one.

cardibach · 04/05/2026 10:50

EasternStandard · 04/05/2026 10:45

It’s like a mantra. Did you miss the recent deaths in the Channel? Labour have ended family reunification therefore more women and girls will try by boat. They are overcrowded, they were crushed, it’s riskier due to Labour’s polices.

It’s the truth, not a mantra. FWIW I disagree with the policy against family reunification (and other policies too amazingly). It’s possible to think a party is the best option without agreeing with them on every point. And also to think a party would be a disaster bit see sense in some things they say - for eg I agree with Rupert Lowe that partisan policy making like the Reform ‘camps in Green areas’ is a gimmick that won’t work.
Incredible really. Why don’t you try it?

PoppyFleur · 04/05/2026 10:52

cardibach · 04/05/2026 10:40

It was for a few hundred and was reciprocal - we’d agreed to take a similar number of the most vulnerable refugees from Rwanda. It wasn’t any kind of solution.

Edited

Excellent point and well done for highlighting it because not nearly enough people know and understand this. It is beyond frustrating that only a few journalists mentioned the fact that the Rwanda deal was reciprocal AND the Rwanda Government categorically stated that it would terminate the agreement if the UK exited from the ECHR. Therefore the Rwanda plan was purely performative and never a workable solution.

It is a disgrace that Suella Braverman wasn’t, and continues to not be, taken to task over this by the mainstream media.

JHound · 04/05/2026 10:52

Greyblankie · 04/05/2026 10:32

They don’t have to come here illegally 🤷‍♀️

They do because most legal routes are closed.

EasternStandard · 04/05/2026 10:52

JHound · 04/05/2026 10:47

So you think it was wrong to stop family reunification?

Labour have pretty much made asylum the preserve of men. Women and girls are suffering far more in many places. The whole system is so disastrously focused on granting male asylum a Sudanese woman and girl were crushed on an overcrowded boat.

The system needs to be redone so women and girls are prioritised both to get here and to benefit women here. There’s a good thread running at 96% atm on a similar question, on a female dominated forum only a few think the current system is ok.

Eskarina1 · 04/05/2026 10:54

Zov · 03/05/2026 12:04

How is everyone who doesn't want Reform in going to just leave the country?

And go where?

With what money?

Where is everyone going to work?

Which country(s?)

How do you know exactly where to buy and what to buy in said 'other country?'

Will you rent? Will you buy?

What if no-one wants us?

People always say this, ('IF REORM GET IN, I WILL LEAVE THE UK - and so will anyone who has any sense!') and it really is very silly to just say 'I'll leave if Reform get in.' The vast majority of people cannot 'just leave' the UK. And most people who say they will leave - won't leave.... A mixture of not being able to, and being too afraid/set in their ways to just upsticks to another country.

Also, there is a very real probablity that it won't be any better in most other countries. Where shall we go? America? Errrrr, NO. (TRUMP!) Canada? THEY won't want us! They are very fussy about who they let in, and so are Australia (and good for them!) Another country in Europe? Speak the language do ya? No. Most people will not And again, people are assuming that these other countries will want them (and they will be able to get a good job just like that!)

So................. Not that simple is it really?! Wink

.

Edited

I've said it before but what I will do if Reform wins is withdraw my resources as far as possible. I will stop working in the public sector and move to the charity sector. I will look for every opportunity to legally avoid tax . I will do what I should be doing anyway and avoid buying new, avoid any corporation that supports Reform (Amazon etc), shop local/grow my own. I will donate the savings to charities that matter to me.

My skills are marketable in Ireland, my husbands are highly sought after in Canada. But I don't want to leave the country.

Eskarina1 · 04/05/2026 10:55

EasternStandard · 04/05/2026 10:52

Labour have pretty much made asylum the preserve of men. Women and girls are suffering far more in many places. The whole system is so disastrously focused on granting male asylum a Sudanese woman and girl were crushed on an overcrowded boat.

The system needs to be redone so women and girls are prioritised both to get here and to benefit women here. There’s a good thread running at 96% atm on a similar question, on a female dominated forum only a few think the current system is ok.

How is this Labour? Their legislation came in in December 2025 and they're still working through a backlog.

TopPocketFind · 04/05/2026 10:56

EasternStandard · 04/05/2026 10:52

Labour have pretty much made asylum the preserve of men. Women and girls are suffering far more in many places. The whole system is so disastrously focused on granting male asylum a Sudanese woman and girl were crushed on an overcrowded boat.

The system needs to be redone so women and girls are prioritised both to get here and to benefit women here. There’s a good thread running at 96% atm on a similar question, on a female dominated forum only a few think the current system is ok.

So you are in favour of legal and safe routes.

I don't agree with Labour's immigration policies but both Reform and Conservatives are proposing to go at lot further.

Swipe left for the next trending thread