Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that alcohol should also be banned for anyone born after 2008?

248 replies

OonaStubbs · Yesterday 02:21

Alcohol causes just as much, if not more harm to society as tobacco does. IMO it should be banned as well. Any possibly junk food as well?

OP posts:
BauhausOfEliott · Yesterday 10:08

The difference is that it's perfectly possible to consume alcohol safely. It isn't possible to smoke tobacco safely.

Also, it's very easy to make alcohol yourself - inmates of prisons do it all the time - so it wouldn't stop people drinking. They'd just drink homebrew that was significantly more dangerous than any alcohol you can buy in the shops.

You might want to research the Prohibition period in the USA if you want to see how badly banning alcohol works out for societies in which alcohol is culturally ingrained (spoiler alert: it doesn't).

Banning 'junk food' makes no sense. Plenty of home-cooked meals made from scratch are also very bad for you. A homemade doughnut isn't any healthier than a bought one. A ready-meal pizza isn't any worse for you than a homemade one. A McDonalds burger isn't more fattening than a homemade fry-up. Plenty of 'junk' food is perfectly innocuous. The term 'junk food' is largely meaningless.

ChristmasBaby2026 · Yesterday 10:11

FiveFitFoxes · Yesterday 08:46

Alcohol is a class 1 carcinogen, the same as tobacco smoke. It increases the risk of various cancers, including breast cancer. It’s estimated that 8% of female breast cancer cases in the UK are linked to alcohol consumption. I am a fun sponge when cancer is involved.

Being alive causes cancer - if you cut out everything that “might” cause cancer, you’re in for a very boring life!

VeneziaJ · Yesterday 10:19

Where do you draw the line with controlling peoples lives here! Do you ban alcohol then move on to all UPF and so called junk food. Next step compulsory exercise classes and weigh ins? Fines for being over weight??
I am a very occasional drinker (and grew up with a functioning alcoholic!) and I do not agree with banning it! Personally I do not want to live in an Orwellian society!

Jnngg · Yesterday 10:20

I think OPs post is way too puritanical. But I was thinking I wouldn't mind banning alcohol for pregnant people.

Bloodyboiling · Yesterday 10:22

TheCurious0range · Yesterday 03:52

Mine almost certainly has

😹😹😹

If my catty were bigger or I were smaller I'd deffo be toast!

Bloodyboiling · Yesterday 10:22

PollyBell · Yesterday 03:53

Just from the look they give of being told no more treats?

😹😹😹

Upstartled · Yesterday 10:23

Jnngg · Yesterday 10:20

I think OPs post is way too puritanical. But I was thinking I wouldn't mind banning alcohol for pregnant people.

Pregnant 'people' - there's something I could get behind banning.

Jnngg · Yesterday 10:24

And definitely don't think the "drinking at home from 5" should be legal

Bloodyboiling · Yesterday 10:27

ElenOfTheWays · Yesterday 05:09

Mine tries all the time the crafty little ninja. Hanging about in dark corners trying to trip me up on the stairs - the furry little bastard!

😹😹😹

Actually now you come to mention it...

Makes me think of the Pink Panther films.

Bloodyboiling · Yesterday 10:27

TwoLeftSocksWithHoles · Yesterday 06:15

Well, they can give you a deadly stare...😱

Too true 😹😹

wishingonastar101 · Yesterday 10:29

I did read that if alcohol was discovered / invented today it would be banned as it's so addictive and harmful. As a heavy drinker I would love to seem more rules on drinking - like why is alcohol available at petrol stations? Why are pubs allowed to open at 5am in airports?

FiveFitFoxes · Yesterday 10:30

ChristmasBaby2026 · Yesterday 10:11

Being alive causes cancer - if you cut out everything that “might” cause cancer, you’re in for a very boring life!

Alcohol is a KNOWN carcinogen, it’s not a “might”. It’s in the same category as tobacco smoke, asbestos and processed meat. I didn’t say we should ban alcohol but that we should be warning about it more - it’s not like I think glass of rose every other weekend is going to kill me 🙄 but cancer rates are only increasing and if you can easily reduce the risk, why wouldn’t you? I am 32 years old and I’ve lost 3 people in my life to cancer, it’s not fun.

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 10:30

Bryonyberries · Yesterday 10:07

My daughter is 2009 so nope, I don’t think the 2008 cut off would work for her without warning!

She would be the only one at a family meal not allowed to order drinks or go clubbing with her friends who are just a few months older, for example.

Changes like this need to be announced ahead of time so the children can know from starting secondary school that the ban is in place when they become adults.

They shouldn’t be banning anything that is sold legally from a certain section of society.
It’s a stupid idea to ban smoking or drinking, neither are healthy but adults should have the choice as long as they’re sold legally.
It’s a waste of money.

MadisonMarieParksValetta · Yesterday 10:30

Banning drugs has worked very well so why not add alcohol to that 🙄

MyDeftDuck · Yesterday 10:31

Dollymylove · Yesterday 08:03

I fail to see how this would be policed. Imagine going into a shop age 26 and being banned from buying fags yet the 29 year old in the queue is allowed. Yes smoking is not good but I have never heard of anyone being killed by a smoking driver, got into a fight through smoking, raped or murdered someone through smoking. Instead of curtailing peoples free will to have a peaceful smoke in their own home, they should be tackling the huge illegal drugs problem we have in this country

Actually Dollymylove, based on the OP’s theory we would still be able to buy those items aged 26 as we would have been born in 2000. I am confident it is the 18 year olds in question.

LizzieW1969 · Yesterday 10:31

Jnngg · Yesterday 10:20

I think OPs post is way too puritanical. But I was thinking I wouldn't mind banning alcohol for pregnant people.

Tbh, I understand why you think that, as my (adopted) DD1 (17) has FASD. The consequences of alcohol through pregnancy can be very tragic.

But how would it ever be enforced? And also, so many women don’t know they’re pregnant in the early stages.

CupcakeDreams · Yesterday 10:32

If as an adult, you feel "pressured" to do anything, are you really an adult?

Should you even be driving a car on your own? What if someone "pressures" you in traffic?

Should you have children? What if someone "pressures" you to do something, or not, with your child and you just can't even say no because of "pressure"

If you can't say no to drinking because of societal "pressure" maybe we need to rethink what it means to be an adult.

This thread is pissing me off with all of the crazy things I'm reading.

No accountability and nanny state advocates where it suits their fear or control issues.

Well done OP, rage bait activated and successful.

Bloodyboiling · Yesterday 10:46

HaveYouHadYourBreak · Yesterday 07:30

Didn't you grow up watching movies where cats ate their owners?

Or maybe it was just a short lived 90's niche horror genre that my weird friend was into?

Edited

😹😹😹

Bloodyboiling · Yesterday 10:47

😹😹😹

Monty36 · Yesterday 10:48

We are a nation that does drink. And has done since goodness knows when. Counties have trade dependent to some extent on it. Use of our apples makes cider. It supports trade. Whisky in Scotland is worth much to the nation in exports. As a Christian country wine is also part of our heritage.

Not drinking is alien to our being, our heritage, our history.
There have always been those who do not. But low in number.

It can bring problems. Learning how to drink matters.

Banning it, no.

WiseMoose · Yesterday 10:51

No. I think fewer people do drink alcohol now - in particular young people.

If you really want to save your health and prevent cancers then cutting out eating meat and other animal products would be very helpful.

Bloodyboiling · Yesterday 10:52

m1ghtl1ke · Yesterday 08:47

Didn’t you watch train spotting. Poor Tommy

Well in fairness if it hadn't been for the smack addiction and contracting AIDS the toxoplasmosis wouldn't likely have been fatal.

My sympathies were with the poor wee kitten.

MistressoftheDarkSide · Yesterday 11:23

LizzieW1969 · Yesterday 10:31

Tbh, I understand why you think that, as my (adopted) DD1 (17) has FASD. The consequences of alcohol through pregnancy can be very tragic.

But how would it ever be enforced? And also, so many women don’t know they’re pregnant in the early stages.

I agree and am very opposed to knowingly doing things detrimental to a developing baby, as the consequences are so unfair. That said, for some women, it really isn't as simple as we'd like to think, especially if their experience of alleged supportive systems has been anything but.

But as you say, the policing or enforcing of such a thing would be a minefield and a slippery slope issue. I vaguely remember some public facing official making suggestions about how women of child bearing age should modify pretty much all their life choices on the off chance that they get pregnant for the thirty odd years that they might be fertile. Not men of course, just women. It didn't go down well as I recall. However, the echoes of "Handmaids Tale" rang out very loudly ....

OonaStubbs · Yesterday 11:24

5foot5 · Yesterday 06:07

Another goody thread where the OP doesn't come back?

I started the thread at 2am. I've been asleep.

OP posts:
Owlmoonstar · Yesterday 11:27

No. I do not.

Where would it end?

Do we ban fast food places like McDonald's?

Do we ban haribo sweets and other pure sugar, zero nutrition foods?

Fizzy drinks?

Do we ban humans from being happy?