Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that alcohol should also be banned for anyone born after 2008?

248 replies

OonaStubbs · Yesterday 02:21

Alcohol causes just as much, if not more harm to society as tobacco does. IMO it should be banned as well. Any possibly junk food as well?

OP posts:
GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · Yesterday 08:31

Smoking mainly harms the smoker (passive smoking aside) so it makes sense to have this aged based cut off ban, where those not yet addicted don’t become so.

The alcohol related consequences that make it harmful affect others as much as the drinker - violence etc - so there’s no sense in making it an age cut off. If you’re going to ban it, ban it to everyone.

Tbh why should someone living with children - or someone living with anyone more vulnerable or weaker than themselves - be allowed to pour a mood altering substance, that can lead them to become abusive and violent, down their necks?

I like a drink as much as most people, but it’s a fair point.

Splitfoot · Yesterday 08:33

CamillaMcCauley · Yesterday 03:25

In itself, the consumption of alcohol doesn’t pose any harm to anyone except the consumer. You and your baby can sit at a table next to someone enjoying a glass of wine and not be affected. The same can’t be said of cigarettes.

This is why it needs to be banned. I can have a beer and it affects no-one.

It stays between me and my liver.

Imdunfer · Yesterday 08:36

You can't ban anything that's as easily created as leaving your fruit juice too long before you drink it.

CupcakeDreams · Yesterday 08:37

Oh, now we want to use the excuse of cancer to ban alcohol.

Well, in that case, ban:
Mobile phones/bluetooth
microwaves
Tefal
black utensils
The sun
sunscreen
diet soda
real soda
sugar
deodorant
polyester
vegetables because of pesticide
seed oils
aging
having a family in case there is a 'history'
tap water

.........................and on, and on, and on, and on

ChristmasBaby2026 · Yesterday 08:40

Spot the fun sponge!

Additup · Yesterday 08:40

Overtheatlantic · Yesterday 03:43

I’m not enough of a communist for this. The smoking ban is bad enough.

I agree. I can see the pluses of the smoking ban but it still doesn't sit comfortably with me.

Also, why haven't vapes been "banned' if cigarettes have?

Imdunfer · Yesterday 08:42

Prohibition?

Didn't America try that 🤣😂🤣 ?

Ally886 · Yesterday 08:43

Do you expect the NHS to continue to operate once you remove £16bn of tax generation from the economy?

FiveFitFoxes · Yesterday 08:46

ChristmasBaby2026 · Yesterday 08:40

Spot the fun sponge!

Alcohol is a class 1 carcinogen, the same as tobacco smoke. It increases the risk of various cancers, including breast cancer. It’s estimated that 8% of female breast cancer cases in the UK are linked to alcohol consumption. I am a fun sponge when cancer is involved.

m1ghtl1ke · Yesterday 08:47

Bloodyboiling · Yesterday 03:01

Cats have killed people???

Didn’t you watch train spotting. Poor Tommy

Aposterhasnoname · Yesterday 08:50

Aside from cases where someone get violent or drives under the influence of alcohol, both of which are already illegal and often result in jail time, drinking alcohol only harms the person choosing to drink it, unlike tobacco smoke.

Isabella70 · Yesterday 08:50

ThisChirpyOpalCat · Yesterday 03:23

They kill birds and wildlife.

And birds kill worms. As many as 20 per hour per bird in the case of American robins.

BillieWiper · Yesterday 08:51

Wordsmithery · Yesterday 03:37

Visit A&E on a Saturday night and you'll see how many bystanders are affected by other people's drinking.

How would you know who was the patient and who was the bystander? And how would you know who had and hadn't had a drink?

Damnloginpopup · Yesterday 08:52

Flomingho · Yesterday 02:38

No, it can be enjoyed responsibly in a social setting, such as a glass of wine with a meal. Things shouldn't be banned for everyone just because some people are irresponsible and don't have an off switch. People need to take responsibility for their own life choices imo.

Why does it have to be responsibly? Occasionally getting wankered with your mates is great too.

Jnngg · Yesterday 08:57

This is the same person who made the teacher with fake boobs post.

Damnloginpopup · Yesterday 08:58

Friday tomorrow isn't it? I'm thinking bag of chips, 20 B&H, a good few glasses of whatever, a greasy doner and back home for 3 and maybe a bunk-up.

A couple of paracetamol and ibuprofen and I should be good for parkrun...(Trust me, it's great with numb legs, hada pb like that one time 🤣)

Who's in?

AbsolutelyOuting · Yesterday 08:59

Stressedoutmummyof3 · Yesterday 08:01

Except that starting on weed is a hell of a slippery slope to much harder drugs like heroin and cocaine. Although my experience is limited to family and friends so I accept that may not be true for everyone.

With respect, people's experiences do differ.
I've known a lot of people over the years who use weed almost daily - not huge amounts, just frequently. Have a smoke in the evening, type thing, where someone else might have a glass of wine. An addiction of sorts but a very mild/limited one. And not slipping into daily cocaine use.

The overwhelming majority of those I know who have used other drugs have done so occasionally to enhance an experience. Eg. Going to a gig, having a bit of ecstasy. Perhaps the anti drugs education worked as there seems to be an awareness that it's an occasional thing and the risk of addiction if done too often!

In that sense, drugs are similar to alcohol. It's just as a society we've accepted alcohol. In all cases, it seems there are some people who can't just have a little bit now and then but quickly increase amounts and become dependent/addicted.

beigetriangle · Yesterday 08:59

yabu

not because I disagree with you but because bootleg and other legitimate alcohol (cleaning products) is incredibly dangerous.

plus, unlike smoking, alcohol is naturally occuring in fermentation processes (pickles, vinegar...) and used as solvent in medicines.

DancingLions · Yesterday 09:01

I haven’t been affected by people smoking. I have been affected by people drinking. Alcoholic abusive parent. Then I went straight to an alcoholic abusive partner. Probably because I was messed up by said parent! Although I did leave him fairly quickly.

The harm from second hand smoke is practically non existent for the vast majority of people now smoking is banned in so many places. Your not going to drop dead on the spot because someone smokes a cigarette beside you but a drunk driver could kill you instantly.

That said, I don’t agree with any ban, including the new smoking one. I wouldn’t be surprised if it got over turned somewhere down the line. We’re too close to too many other countries that don’t have a ban. Cigarettes will still be sold in vast quantities to the people that want them. It might have worked in New Zealand who originally came up with the idea, as they’re so remote. But even they dropped it. It’s ridiculous to think it can ever really be enforced to any degree.

allthingsinmoderation · Yesterday 09:04

Banning adults from things older adults will be ineffective in preventing younger adults from using those things wether thats cigarettes,alcohol or food..
An adult born say in 1995(aged 31yrs) can buy all those things legally let say this person fills up the fridge with Wine and Pizza.
An adult in that family born in 2008 (18 yrs) is banned from the wine and Pizza.
I dont think thats feasible.
And will become more difficult as the yrs go by.
Eventually we will have a situation where some adults can legally drink alcohol and eat junk food and other adults can not. I don't think that will fly..

Scunnygal · Yesterday 09:07

Overtheatlantic · Yesterday 03:43

I’m not enough of a communist for this. The smoking ban is bad enough.

For some reason the people I hear complaining about the smoking ban are also not happy with the idea of decriminalising drugs. Why is that?

Jnngg · Yesterday 09:08

I do judge people who do drugs harder than weed.

Scunnygal · Yesterday 09:09

LakieLady · Yesterday 08:26

An alcohol ban would mean no coq au vin, no sherry trifle, no steak and ale pie, no pears poached in red wine and my amazing beef braised in Guinness would be off the menu forever. 😪

You can get alcohol free version of those. The alcohol burns off in the cooking anyway

SailingYachty · Yesterday 09:09

FiveFitFoxes · Yesterday 08:02

I do think there needs to be more warnings about alcohol and cancer.

Also unpopular opinion but there should definitely be more warning about processed meat and cancer.

Totally agree on both.
I can’t believe that ham is still the go to sandwich filling for kids parties and lunchboxes when out and about, when the link to cancer has been proven!

SailingYachty · Yesterday 09:12

CupcakeDreams · Yesterday 08:37

Oh, now we want to use the excuse of cancer to ban alcohol.

Well, in that case, ban:
Mobile phones/bluetooth
microwaves
Tefal
black utensils
The sun
sunscreen
diet soda
real soda
sugar
deodorant
polyester
vegetables because of pesticide
seed oils
aging
having a family in case there is a 'history'
tap water

.........................and on, and on, and on, and on

Have you had cancer? Well take it from someone who does it’s not much fun and yes all the things that have been shown to cause cancer should indeed be widely damned, if not banned!

Swipe left for the next trending thread