Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Animal cruelty - lack of support on threads

239 replies

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 00:31

so am posting here because I’ve tried on other threads ( keep getting moved). In light of the last few days and what we’re learning. Testing on animals/ Beagles in the UK. I’m feeling heartbroken and have been so unaware. Anyone else?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
RedWineCupcakes · 23/04/2026 13:06

@TheGoldenOwl
The technology for the COVID vaccines had been in process for years. It wasn't a case of starting from scratch.

Lets be clear, I would be very happy if there never had to be any more animal testing. It is currently a legal requirement that pharma companies cannot dip out of. Every year, there are advances, but science and progress take time. It does not take much imagination to think of the problems it would cause if we just dropped it all overnight, without fully validated alternatives in place. In silico testing and AI modelling is bringing things forwards at pace, but does not remove all risk of off target, unanticipated side effects.

HoppityBun · 23/04/2026 13:06

TheGoldenOwl · 23/04/2026 12:38

I don't think saying "you're naive/silly/stupid for not knowing about this before, been around for ages etc"

Of course it has been around, of course people were aware of it, etc etc

But surely it's better to say "well done for realising the impact (and presumably preparing to get involved)" rather than "you're late you idiot"

Plenty of people have a realisation or reckoning of things at all different times. That's ok.

This is a really poor example/comparison. But I love classical music.
When someone (tentatively) says "So I listened to some thing called "Chopin" and I don't know much about it but it was kind of nice? Classical music is kind of cool no?..."

I say "oh yes! there's so much more to listen to, come in I am so pleased you're here"
not
"classical music has been there the whole time you idiot. what were you listening to before?? drake?"

As I say - very clumsy example and I am not comparing listening to Drake to Animal Testing, (!!!) but do you see what I mean? People discover things all the time having known they were there, it doesn't mean they care any less when they (eventually) have a moment?

Also, the abuses and intensification of animal farming has been incremental. Added to which, there is a huge marketing effort to portray e.g. happy cows in fields, delighted to have had their calves taken away so that they can “give” their milk to their darling humans.

The idea that hens that are not in battery farms lead happy, sunny, clucking spacious lives is active misinformation.

And darling little lambs are eaten.

Pretty much every bit of advertising related to animal products that is on supermarket shelves is deception. I don’t blame people for not knowing that, but I am appalled that, once informed, many people are indifferent.

Queenhecate · 23/04/2026 13:06

@theyhavenovoice I don’t buy cosmetics tested on animals. However, I have to take a swathe of medication every day to keep me alive and reduce my pain levels. Afaik all medications are tested on animals. What do you suggest I do?

Keepthecat · 23/04/2026 13:10

Yes me too. Once youve seen or heard something upsetting and disturbing, you can't unsee or unhear it. But there's a real hardness in society nowadays, so we could be a dying breed.

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:12

Queenhecate · 23/04/2026 13:06

@theyhavenovoice I don’t buy cosmetics tested on animals. However, I have to take a swathe of medication every day to keep me alive and reduce my pain levels. Afaik all medications are tested on animals. What do you suggest I do?

I’m not suggesting people don’t take their meds. I’m saying the practices are cruel and we need to create more awareness. I can shop differently now, more mindfully. And help reduce demand for products/ brands unnecessarily testing or marketed and sold in China for example.

I think posters calling me naive are naive themselves -that they think they are ‘all knowing.’ I don’t think they realise themselves the full extent.

OP posts:
theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:13

HoppityBun · 23/04/2026 13:06

Also, the abuses and intensification of animal farming has been incremental. Added to which, there is a huge marketing effort to portray e.g. happy cows in fields, delighted to have had their calves taken away so that they can “give” their milk to their darling humans.

The idea that hens that are not in battery farms lead happy, sunny, clucking spacious lives is active misinformation.

And darling little lambs are eaten.

Pretty much every bit of advertising related to animal products that is on supermarket shelves is deception. I don’t blame people for not knowing that, but I am appalled that, once informed, many people are indifferent.

Agree

OP posts:
Allisnotlost1 · 23/04/2026 13:20

AngryHerring · 23/04/2026 10:44

you'll be volunteering then? There is a reason that there isn't human testing in this way - much as we find it distressing and distasteful - how are you going to find healthy humans who will volunteer to be tested on, killed and then a post mortem so we can see if there was damage or not?

You'll be first in line for that? or will it be prisoners? or the poor and destitute who see no other way of making a bit of cash?

You’re kind of highlighting what is so abhorrent about animal testing. That you can’t imagine anyone willingly undergoing it. But it’s ok to force and breed sentient animals for the purpose? I mean if you’re ok with that, that’s your moral choice and just say that. But presenting it as ‘we have to do it to animals because humans wouldn’t agree’ is pretty weird.

Arguably a necessary evil for cancer or other life saving medications. Much harder to justify for other drugs.

Queenhecate · 23/04/2026 13:27

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:12

I’m not suggesting people don’t take their meds. I’m saying the practices are cruel and we need to create more awareness. I can shop differently now, more mindfully. And help reduce demand for products/ brands unnecessarily testing or marketed and sold in China for example.

I think posters calling me naive are naive themselves -that they think they are ‘all knowing.’ I don’t think they realise themselves the full extent.

Edited

I try to avoid products that have been shipped miles, buy local where I can. I eat mostly vegetarian, have meat maybe once a week.

I already said I don’t buy cosmetics tested on animals?

Queenhecate · 23/04/2026 13:28

Allisnotlost1 · 23/04/2026 13:20

You’re kind of highlighting what is so abhorrent about animal testing. That you can’t imagine anyone willingly undergoing it. But it’s ok to force and breed sentient animals for the purpose? I mean if you’re ok with that, that’s your moral choice and just say that. But presenting it as ‘we have to do it to animals because humans wouldn’t agree’ is pretty weird.

Arguably a necessary evil for cancer or other life saving medications. Much harder to justify for other drugs.

Would you allow it for pain relieving drugs? For blood pressure medications? For anti depressants? Hrt? Laxatives?

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:29

I think the comments that respond almost with a ‘blanket’ life saving/ meds response are using cognitive dissonance. That it’s an easy way to solve the uncomfortable truth and to justify choices/ way we live and then turn a blind eye. Like so many issues, there’s ‘messiness’ and without campaigns and holding people responsible to regulations, change doesn’t happen.
Look at Temple Gradin and her work for example on humane livestock slaughter. If nothing else it’s so interesting and how she used her neurodiversity for great change.

OP posts:
Queenhecate · 23/04/2026 13:34

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:29

I think the comments that respond almost with a ‘blanket’ life saving/ meds response are using cognitive dissonance. That it’s an easy way to solve the uncomfortable truth and to justify choices/ way we live and then turn a blind eye. Like so many issues, there’s ‘messiness’ and without campaigns and holding people responsible to regulations, change doesn’t happen.
Look at Temple Gradin and her work for example on humane livestock slaughter. If nothing else it’s so interesting and how she used her neurodiversity for great change.

Edited

How am I using cognitive dissonance?

I know EXACTLY what happens on a chicken farm. In a chicken house. I know how calves are reared. I KNOW what happens.

I grew up with a farming family and worked the abbatoir in the summer after my a levels.

how is it cognitive dissonance?

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:35

Read the entire thread if you don’t get it

OP posts:
theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Good for you

OP posts:
Swiftie1878 · 23/04/2026 13:44

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

There’s no need to be rude.

And you’re wrong. There’s no cognitive dissonance because there’s no conflict. If they value meds and how they contribute to society, some people accept animal testing as a necessary evil.

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:48

Have you seen angryherrings comment to me ???

OP posts:
theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:49

Swiftie1878 · 23/04/2026 13:44

There’s no need to be rude.

And you’re wrong. There’s no cognitive dissonance because there’s no conflict. If they value meds and how they contribute to society, some people accept animal testing as a necessary evil.

You don’t understand cognitive dissonance then

OP posts:
Blimms · 23/04/2026 13:49

Swiftie1878 · 23/04/2026 13:44

There’s no need to be rude.

And you’re wrong. There’s no cognitive dissonance because there’s no conflict. If they value meds and how they contribute to society, some people accept animal testing as a necessary evil.

I think the OP has run out of any logical argument so she is resorting to being rude and throwing about the term ‘cognitive dissonance’.

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:50

I’ll be leaving this thread. I’m being rude because others are bloody rude. What a waste of time and energy

OP posts:
theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:53

Swiftie1878 · 23/04/2026 09:00

Hard for people to support you when they have no clue what you’re talking about.

Like you said you’ve no clue so you obvs don’t understand cognitive dissonance

OP posts:
Queenhecate · 23/04/2026 13:56

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

what Do you want me to say?

i grew up lifting the dead ones in my granny’s chicken houses. See also calves being taken and the boy calves being sold. I worked the abbatoir the summer after school coz it paid the best. I didn’t give a shit about animal testing then either.

I know what happens.

now, I rarely eat meat and shop as sustainably as possible. I try to avoid animal products. But I take loads of pain killers, I get treatment for cancer, I have blood pressure meds, hrt, antidepressants. Moisturisers. Prescription ones. And probably more I’ve forgotten What am I supposed to do?

Blimms · 23/04/2026 13:56

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:50

I’ll be leaving this thread. I’m being rude because others are bloody rude. What a waste of time and energy

Yep, that figures.

Queenhecate · 23/04/2026 13:57

theyhavenovoice · 23/04/2026 13:49

You don’t understand cognitive dissonance then

Define it for me then and tell me how I am being cognitively dissonant. Please.

Blimms · 23/04/2026 13:58

Queenhecate · 23/04/2026 13:57

Define it for me then and tell me how I am being cognitively dissonant. Please.

She can’t define it because she doesn’t really understand what it means. She’s simply throwing it about to try and shut people up.