I think that’s a very long way from being correct.
I grew up on a council estate and went to the local comprehensive. I left school with good grades. I am academic. I’ve had an excellent career.
But I can’t say that’s because of the school I went to. It was an absolute bear pit.
There’s a lot of crime on council estates. That doesn’t vanish when those same teenagers go to their local comprehensive.
There are high profile cases in both the state and private sectors. Our local state comprehensive had a stabbing in the last couple of years. We’ve got teachers here out on strike because they can’t control a group of teens who run wild around the school, screaming up and down corridors during lessons and refusing to be disciplined. The teachers aren’t striking for more pay - they’re asking for safe working conditions. I don’t see teachers in the private sector afraid to go to work.
In more general terms, there’s the disruption during lessons. Some of that’s due to unmet needs - children from higher income families are more likely to have been able to receive the required medical care to be diagnosed with dyslexia, dyscalculia, ADHD, autism etc.
Children from higher income homes may have parents who take education seriously. Certainly parents are paying &£££ for education they’ll expect their child to take it seriously. That doesn’t mean that no one on a council estate does; some certainly do. But it can’t be denied that in rough areas, there are some families who don’t feel school is important.
At state schools there are fewer teachers and larger classes. This provides more opportunities for problems to occur at lunches, break times etc, let alone in the classroom.
When I was at secondary school (in the 90s), marijuana use during the school day was rife. And Poppers. Kids may not have been sneaking off to snort coke but weed was endemic. And of course, Ecstasy was starting to become popular - although not during school hours.
We had gunfights after school. And knife fights. Those took place in the underpass outside our school and our nearest rivals. That would never have made the press or have been reported because it was commonplace. And when you consider knife crime has worsened, I don’t want to think about what it’s like now.
Both my DC have very significant SEN so I have no skin in this game. But why on earth would any parent not try to avoid sending their child to a comprehensive in a rough area where they’re unlikely to enjoy uninterrupted lessons? Why subject your child to violent peers - any child can get sucked into gang violence or county lines…it just takes the right kind of pressure and the wrong time and that’s your child’s future fucked.