Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Now that America are the baddies what sort of world order are we going for

175 replies

CurdinHenry · 12/04/2026 19:44

Surely we can drum up something positive

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
ComradeAmoeba · 14/04/2026 09:34

Notonthestairs · 14/04/2026 07:56

There is no regime change.
Nothing has changed for women in Iran.

The difference is now that the SoH is closed, Russia has had a cash boost and the price of food will go up further.

Some of the posters who were all over every Iran thread like a rash, cheering the war on for the sake of the oppressed people of Iran etc., are suddenly very conspicuous by their absence...

BrinkWomanship · 14/04/2026 10:48

DdraigGoch · 14/04/2026 01:38

You literally said:

But the US is doing the right thing: removing the ability of our sworn enemy to use nuclear weapons against us and our allies.

If Iran can't use nuclear weapons then what ability are the US removing?

Its ability to use them in the near future.

Notonthestairs · 14/04/2026 11:20

Russia’s cash boost - from the Times.
Sanctions relief has been extended by the US until July so a good first half of the year for Russia.

Now that America are the baddies what sort of world order are we going for
DdraigGoch · 14/04/2026 14:02

Ponoka7 · 14/04/2026 07:28

But to other young people, not girls of 9, to men over 30. Within the Muslim population of Gaza there were no laws around violence, including sexual violence, against women and girls. Women can and are beaten in the streets, because they aren't dressed modestly enough, or it isn't believed that they have their male guardian's permission to be out. That's without going into honour killings. Let's not get to ridiculous levels to compare life in the US to a region under Sharia Law. That's pushing it, even for this forum.

You reckon that there aren't girls as young as 12 in the US being made to marry their adult rapist?

DdraigGoch · 14/04/2026 14:04

BrinkWomanship · 14/04/2026 10:48

Its ability to use them in the near future.

Which it didn't have. The CIA said that Iran was a long way away

Ilovelifeverymuch · 14/04/2026 23:02

This is what is happening in Iran right now and this doesn't include the protestors that were killed on the street, these are the ones arrested and going through sham trials.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/tu50psmAjXY?si=VndS3YX4Hibl3tdX

TopPocketFind · 14/04/2026 23:09

That just confirms that this war has not changed anything in Iran

PomplaMouse · 14/04/2026 23:31

Ilovelifeverymuch · 14/04/2026 23:02

This is what is happening in Iran right now and this doesn't include the protestors that were killed on the street, these are the ones arrested and going through sham trials.

Yes, sadly the war has only served to further entrench the current regime and seems quite likely to further radicalize it.

This "war" has been a disaster for the US (and the world), but its the Iranian people that will continue to bear the brunt.

PomplaMouse · 14/04/2026 23:42

Ponoka7 · 14/04/2026 07:28

But to other young people, not girls of 9, to men over 30. Within the Muslim population of Gaza there were no laws around violence, including sexual violence, against women and girls. Women can and are beaten in the streets, because they aren't dressed modestly enough, or it isn't believed that they have their male guardian's permission to be out. That's without going into honour killings. Let's not get to ridiculous levels to compare life in the US to a region under Sharia Law. That's pushing it, even for this forum.

But to other young people
That isn't the case. Most child marriages in the US are between young girls (as young as 10) and adult men (some aged 60+).

I know the US isn't, by any measure, the worst place to be female - but it is a huge outlier among developed nations as to legality of abuse of girls.

DdraigGoch · 15/04/2026 01:19

Ilovelifeverymuch · 14/04/2026 23:02

This is what is happening in Iran right now and this doesn't include the protestors that were killed on the street, these are the ones arrested and going through sham trials.

So Trump hasn't saved the Iranian people from their oppressors?

What exactly is he hoping to achieve with this?

PomplaMouse · 15/04/2026 01:48

DdraigGoch · 15/04/2026 01:19

So Trump hasn't saved the Iranian people from their oppressors?

What exactly is he hoping to achieve with this?

Genuinely the only motivation that makes any sense is to distract from the Epstien files. Or perhaps its to further align with Putin/Russia and damage Europe.

People (ignorant ones at least - not you) seem to forget that the US's current, stated primary aim - cessation of nuclear weapons programs - was something that had already been achieved before Trump ripped up the painstakingly negotiated agreement in 2018 - presumably for little reason other than it was signed off on Obama's watch.

reprobates10 · 15/04/2026 02:21

NotAnotherScarf · 13/04/2026 18:33

Yep...they just had Hollywood for propaganda.... like how they won ww2, the Native Americans were evil and how they actually won in Vietnam...

Key Findings on DoD Support:
Over 800+ Feature Films (1911–2017): Documents obtained via FOIA requests suggest that more than 800 feature films received some form of support from the DoD.
2,500+ Total Productions (Films & TV): The 2022 documentary Theaters of War and related research indicate that the military has supervised or assisted in more than 2,500 war-themed films and television shows.
410+ Documented Films: A compiled list by researchers tracking the "military-entertainment complex" includes 410 DoD-sponsored movies.
2023 Support: In 2023 alone, the DoD entered production assistance agreements with TV shows, including America's Got Talent and The Kelly Clarkson Show.
Wikipedia +4

NotAnotherScarf · 15/04/2026 08:35

reprobates10 · 15/04/2026 02:21

Key Findings on DoD Support:
Over 800+ Feature Films (1911–2017): Documents obtained via FOIA requests suggest that more than 800 feature films received some form of support from the DoD.
2,500+ Total Productions (Films & TV): The 2022 documentary Theaters of War and related research indicate that the military has supervised or assisted in more than 2,500 war-themed films and television shows.
410+ Documented Films: A compiled list by researchers tracking the "military-entertainment complex" includes 410 DoD-sponsored movies.
2023 Support: In 2023 alone, the DoD entered production assistance agreements with TV shows, including America's Got Talent and The Kelly Clarkson Show.
Wikipedia +4

Or just watch one John Wayne film 😁

MyOliveStork · 15/04/2026 08:37

Baddies or not, we are now definitely one of the little people

BrinkWomanship · 15/04/2026 10:40

DdraigGoch · 14/04/2026 14:04

Which it didn't have. The CIA said that Iran was a long way away

Not to the US. To Israel.
And how much margin of error in the timeline to nuclear arms capability is acceptable to you?

Golden407 · 15/04/2026 11:23

StandFirm · 13/04/2026 15:39

But what can be done when the US administration actively serves Russia's interests??

I’m not sure that the US actively serves Russias interests. I think it’s more a case that they have accepted that the US and Europe are not strong enough to actually subjugate Russia and need to come to terms with the reality of the situation.

Personally, I think Europe would be wise to do the same.

TopPocketFind · 15/04/2026 11:48

Golden407 · 15/04/2026 11:23

I’m not sure that the US actively serves Russias interests. I think it’s more a case that they have accepted that the US and Europe are not strong enough to actually subjugate Russia and need to come to terms with the reality of the situation.

Personally, I think Europe would be wise to do the same.

The US have lifted sanctions on Russia, that serves Russia's interests

MrsTerryPratchett · 15/04/2026 14:24

BrinkWomanship · 13/04/2026 00:29

Iran has not only stated it wants to destroy Israel, the US and the West, it has taken active steps to do so. It’s funded militias and terrorists in the Middle East and the west, provides oil and arms China and Russia, subjugates and massacres its own people, and was working towards having a nuclear bomb that it intended to use on Israel first. it announced this repeatedly. It had a clock in Tehran with a countdown until it destroyed Israel. These guys were not lying!

I know who the baddies are and it’s not Israel and the US.

Israel has shown us that it will work hard to survive (Iran is a literal existential threat to Israel) and the US also will do the same. We benefit from their actions.

Thank goodness they have the moral clarity to know right from wrong and the means and courage to enforce it.

Edited

The US has stated it wants to destroy socialism, and has taken active steps to do it. It has funded militias and contras in Africa and Central America, and SEAsia. Supplies arms to same, and everyone else. Has lots of nuclear weapons and just threatened to obliterate an entire civilisation. Did use nukes on Japan.

I can’t be arsed to carry on the real equivalency. But it’s real. But but but a democracy is getting thin.

DdraigGoch · 15/04/2026 14:55

BrinkWomanship · 15/04/2026 10:40

Not to the US. To Israel.
And how much margin of error in the timeline to nuclear arms capability is acceptable to you?

According to Trump, Iran's nuclear programme was "obliterated" last year. But now apparently it was a threat? Not based on any intel, he just said that he could feel it in his bones...

DdraigGoch · 15/04/2026 14:57

Golden407 · 15/04/2026 11:23

I’m not sure that the US actively serves Russias interests. I think it’s more a case that they have accepted that the US and Europe are not strong enough to actually subjugate Russia and need to come to terms with the reality of the situation.

Personally, I think Europe would be wise to do the same.

Witkoff was basically coaching the Russians on how to manipulate Trump

moderate · 17/04/2026 01:27

CurdinHenry · 12/04/2026 19:44

Surely we can drum up something positive

America are not "the baddies" by a long shot.

Be careful what you wish for.

CurdinHenry · 17/04/2026 20:55

moderate · 17/04/2026 01:27

America are not "the baddies" by a long shot.

Be careful what you wish for.

They always have been.

OP posts:
Ilovelifeverymuch · 17/04/2026 21:05

CurdinHenry · 17/04/2026 20:55

They always have been.

They have always been and yet your whole security was dependent on them. That means your leaders have massively failed you 😂

Resolving the issue in Iran will benefit the whole world and more especially the Middle East not just the US. Ofcourse the US has its own interests including countering China and so does Israel but it still benefits the world.

Is the short term pain of higher oil prices good no, but it would be worth it if Iran can be forced to drop its nuclear ambitions and infact end the fucking regime once and for all.

Every single major leader including Starmer agree that the Iranian regime is evil.

"As of April 2026, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has strongly condemned the Iranian regime as "abhorrent", citing its brutal domestic crackdown and regional destabilization.

Starmer described the regime as having "murdered thousands of its own people" and destabilized the region, including supporting proxies targeting shipping.

He firmly stated that Iran must never be allowed to possess nuclear weapons"

"European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that "no tears should be shed" for the Iranian leadership, citing the regime's long history of repression, internal killing of protesters, and destabilization of the region through proxies. Speaking amid heightened conflict in March 2026, she expressed support for the Iranian people's desire for freedom and transition away from the current regime."

Not attacking Iran today doesn't mean the issue is resolved it just means it's being pushed to the future for someone else to deal with.

moderate · 17/04/2026 21:40

CurdinHenry · 17/04/2026 20:55

They always have been.

This would be hilarious if it weren’t so consequential.

sleepwouldbenice · 18/04/2026 23:49

Ilovelifeverymuch · 17/04/2026 21:05

They have always been and yet your whole security was dependent on them. That means your leaders have massively failed you 😂

Resolving the issue in Iran will benefit the whole world and more especially the Middle East not just the US. Ofcourse the US has its own interests including countering China and so does Israel but it still benefits the world.

Is the short term pain of higher oil prices good no, but it would be worth it if Iran can be forced to drop its nuclear ambitions and infact end the fucking regime once and for all.

Every single major leader including Starmer agree that the Iranian regime is evil.

"As of April 2026, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has strongly condemned the Iranian regime as "abhorrent", citing its brutal domestic crackdown and regional destabilization.

Starmer described the regime as having "murdered thousands of its own people" and destabilized the region, including supporting proxies targeting shipping.

He firmly stated that Iran must never be allowed to possess nuclear weapons"

"European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that "no tears should be shed" for the Iranian leadership, citing the regime's long history of repression, internal killing of protesters, and destabilization of the region through proxies. Speaking amid heightened conflict in March 2026, she expressed support for the Iranian people's desire for freedom and transition away from the current regime."

Not attacking Iran today doesn't mean the issue is resolved it just means it's being pushed to the future for someone else to deal with.

Edited

Sorry but the only point that makes sense in this is the suggestion we dont rely on the US anymore
Rest is delusional crap

New posts on this thread. Refresh page