Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I want the house. AIBU?

415 replies

HouseFair · 02/04/2026 18:05

I feel like this might be controversial…

My boyfriend and I are buying a house. We have been together three years and I’m pregnant! Happy surprise. I own a flat but we live together in a rented house as he has three older kids so my flat isn’t big enough for us all. I’m selling it to provide the deposit on the house.

Part of the mortgage discussion is on life insurance. I have told him I want mirror policies in place which pay off the mortgage which leave the house in the surviving person’s name. He seems reticent about this and I think it’s because he thinks it should be left to his kids.

AIBU?

OP posts:
Rileysp · 03/04/2026 08:57

carchi · 03/04/2026 08:55

Exactly this. If you have a property that already has a large amount of equity and it sounds like yous does then that's an amazing asset. You can use it to make money by renting. If you can wait a while then get the rent as part of your earnings for the mortgage. Also somewhere to go if you ever need it (hopefully you won't)

But it’s clear she needs the equity for the deposit isn’t it? And presumably doesn’t want the instability of renting.

like most when they move house

carnivalcat · 03/04/2026 09:21

Soontobe60 · 03/04/2026 08:57

It sounds like if he died tomorrow ie before the house purchase, his Dc wouldn’t get anything as he doesn’t have any money or life insurance?
In your situation you need to ensure that your deposit is ringfenced so if you’re providing a 20% deposit, you get back 20% of any future equity should you split up. It’s important to use % rather than amount - if you only ringfence a deposit of £50k, you’ll only get £50k back if you split, but that amount will not be increased for inflation.
‘You also need to own the house as tenants in common, not joint tenants. Then you need to insure his life to the value of half the mortgage. You can also take out insurance against your own life for your own children.
What he chooses to do in terms of life insurance is up to him. You don’t need a joint policy.
He comes across as grabby!

How on earth is he grabby for wanting to protect his share of the house (which he will contribute to over time) for the sake of his children?

Surely in this situation the grabby character would be the one insisting that they get all of the house, at the exclusion of children.

Zebedee999 · 03/04/2026 09:47

BlueMum16 · 02/04/2026 18:07

Could it be his half to all 4 kids but with you being able to live there until you meet someone's/move out?

You then leave your half to your DC with him being able to live there?

We are doing similar with our home.

Good compromise.

Ihatetomatoes · 03/04/2026 09:51

PinkyFlamingo · 02/04/2026 18:08

I wouldnt be buying a house with anyone who was going to leave me potentially homeless if they died that's for sure

This.

Also its the OPS flat sale that's providing the deposit! What's he contributing? Yet wants HIS kids to take precedent over OP if he dies!

BlueMum16 · 03/04/2026 11:11

Ihatetomatoes · 03/04/2026 09:51

This.

Also its the OPS flat sale that's providing the deposit! What's he contributing? Yet wants HIS kids to take precedent over OP if he dies!

Presume he's paying half the mortgage for the other 90% of the property.

ElizabethReed · 03/04/2026 11:22

BlueMum16 · 03/04/2026 11:11

Presume he's paying half the mortgage for the other 90% of the property.

Don’t presume anything
He’s got three children and an ex that’s still rinsing him

sunshinestar1986 · 03/04/2026 11:31

Another2Cats · 03/04/2026 06:47

This is just the trope of the 'wicked stepmother' in reverse. If you reverse the sexes then it makes it plain what you are saying here:

Never trust a woman with other kids, her loyalties are too divided.
She might even prioritise her older kids over yours because they were born first.

Women have to protect themselves, simple as. They always have more to lose. In every way.
Men should also protect their kids. Blending families is very complicated.

mcmuffin22 · 03/04/2026 12:50

Op, you sound much more financially savvy than him. I would advise waiting a while after the baby is born to see what kind of parent he is to a young child and how he is as a father to your child before becoming financially entwined with this man. Also I suspect he may feel like it is your job to finance your child while he focuses on the other three

HouseFair · 03/04/2026 13:43

D0RA · 02/04/2026 22:52

I know two mums who did this and then both sadly died in their 30s ( one of cancer and one from Covid ). The same thing happened in both cases .

The kids went to stay with her parents while the mum was dying in hospital ( as the dads couldn’t cope and so they could be at the hospital etc ).

After the death, the kids stayed with their GPs as the dad was grieving and couldn’t cope.

Then very VERY quickly, the dads were in new relationships, moved their new partner into the family home and didn’t want their kids back, as they thought it would be “ too unsettling for them “. In one family, the kids were very young ( toddler and new born baby) , so after 6 months of not seeing their dad they hardly even remembered him.

Now these children are being brought up by their maternal grandparents , who get no money and little support from the kids dads .None of these kids will get any of the money / half of the house that their mum left them until their dad dies, which will probably be another 50 or even 60 years. Because that’s what was in the will - the surviving spouse could live there as life rent.

Now I know you are thinking “ my kids dad would never do that “. But half of all days stop seeing their kids completely within 5 years of a separation / divorce so it’s not logical to think that widowed men will act completely differently.

I also have close friends whose mum died suddenly when they were at university . She had left her half of the house to her kids , to go to them straightaway on her death. Their dad said he would “ buy them out “ and put the money into an account for them to buy flats when they graduated. Of course they agreed to this as they didn’t want him to sell the family home as they would have no where to go on university holidays and that was where they had grown up.

The dad he very quickly remarried, sold the house and moved about 400 miles to the other end of the counrty. The kids never saw the a penny of the money he promised them and when he died, the whole house was left to his second wife and then to her children.

Thank You for sharing. As DP has fought very hard to stay in his children’s lives, I don’t think he’d walk away from our child. I do think I’d be swiftly replaced though! And if he and
another woman ended up raising my child along with SC, I think it’s fair enough that they get a paid off house to do it in, and hopefully they’d have a better qualify of childhood. DP comes from a country where you can’t disinherit a child so although it’s possible, I think it’s unlikely he’d disinherit them.

I’ll have separate insurance policies and trusts going to my child in trust.

OP posts:
HouseFair · 03/04/2026 13:52

Rileysp · 03/04/2026 06:39

I think you need to take legal advice. But there are clearly solutions as this isn’t an unusual situation

my thoughts

1- I don’t think either are wrong. You need an adult conversation about this, and it should really have taken place before putting in an offer on a property.

2- I think the best short term solution is he takes out another Insurance policy for his 3 children with an ex partner. Especially in this period where your financial contributions on the house are so different. It’s something as a family you’ll have to budget for, but it’ll probably meet both your needs

3- there’s a lot of baseless judgements made about this man. As normal. When I bought, my now wife didn’t have a deposit. Sometimes life goes like that. We know nothing about him. What divorce cost him, what he financially gave up. Nothing at all. So calls on his character are very premature

3- the OP is thinking very short term here. What I get. But if he’s another 30 years, and he’s contributing financially to the home, then I get the issue with his children being disinherited. So in the short term he needs an additional policy, but longer term I also think there needs to be a consideration again

4- it’s pretty clear that buying a place requires her selling the flat. Obviously in an ideal world she keeps it…. But clearly they can’t. Renting is throwing money away when you’ve 4 kids and need security. It’s in nobody’s interest.

Thank you for this balanced view.

I’d be happy to discuss again when our child is say, 10, and then 18. I’m not trying to rip off his children, just to protect mine’s childhood security if the worst happens.

OP posts:
Shittyyear2025 · 03/04/2026 14:03

HouseFair · 02/04/2026 19:32

But he’s renting so right now there is no inheritance that way. He’s got nothing in savings to contribute to the deposit.

My fear is that he’d die, and his ex would sue me for lost CMS or something, I’d have to give up my child’s home whilst in mourning to give a payout to his kids.

If he wants to take out insurance policies or save up to leave money to his kids, that’s great. I don’t see why they have to be given our home.

He can take out additional life insurance. You both can. But his % of the equity in the house should absolutely go to his kids!

Let's say you remain unmarried and the house is bought as joint tenants, should either of you die the house passes to the other immediately.

If he dies, you get everything and his older kids get nada.

If you buy as tenants in common, where you ringfence your deposit and split the remaining according to accrued equity then you get your original share back as a % and the rest is split
(Say purchase price £100k, you put in 50k, set up tenants in common at 75%yours, 25% his so if he dies you keep your share as a proportion of your original investment, ALL his kids get a share of his 25% of accrued equity)

If you're married then I believe you'd get his share anyway unless he writes a will. He could still write a will passing his share to ALL his kids leaving you a lifetime interest.

You could both get extra life insurance as if either one of you dies then the expense of bringing up your joint child alone would be covered. He can take extra to ensure his own DC are taken care of.

As an aside, you're more likely to be critically ill than die during your mortgage term, worth considering this insurance too.

OldScribbler · 03/04/2026 17:54

Always operate on the assumption something will go wrong

Judecb · 03/04/2026 18:05

If you got married, you'd get it all if he died. Just saying!

user1485851222 · 03/04/2026 18:07

Under no circumstances, sell your flat until this is sorted. DO NOT agree to
• sorting it at a later date, (it will be too late).
• only buy the property if he agrees that if he dies first, house goes to you & vice versa

Or

• seek legal advice, to see if possible, that if he dies first, his share goes to his children upon your death OR you can buy the children out of their share & vice versa if you were in agreement.

Don't be afraid to discuss your fears with him, you love each other & you can sort this, you just need to address the issues on both sides.

But obviously ring fence your deposit.

UniquePinkSwan · 03/04/2026 18:11

andthat · 02/04/2026 21:36

Why? She is far more solvent than he is!

if the sexes were reversed you’d be making sure the woman got married. It should be the same for the man

exaltedwombat · 03/04/2026 18:17

That’s part of the baggage you took on - he’s got kids and your relationship with him shouldn’t completely disinherit them. Work something out.

DuckbilledSplatterPuff · 03/04/2026 18:37

madwomanintheatticc · 02/04/2026 18:10

Your deposit ringfenced.

Then his remaining 50% in trust to his kids, yours to you and your child.

Her baby is also his child?

Someonenewagain · 03/04/2026 20:04

My brother did that. When he died his 2nd wife got everything, leaving his children from previous marriage with nothing

Casperroonie · 03/04/2026 20:34

Keep your flat, do not sell it. Rent it out.

Find deposit elsewhere or simply wait.

croydon15 · 03/04/2026 20:38

The fairer way and what most people do is leave the home to the surviving partner with the proviso that if they want to sell the property they give the share of the deceased partner to the children or when the partner dies the.property is sold and the children inherite the partner portion.
You are bu as you are already considering desheriting his children, that's not right.

1HappyTraveller · 03/04/2026 20:45

HouseFair · 02/04/2026 19:32

But he’s renting so right now there is no inheritance that way. He’s got nothing in savings to contribute to the deposit.

My fear is that he’d die, and his ex would sue me for lost CMS or something, I’d have to give up my child’s home whilst in mourning to give a payout to his kids.

If he wants to take out insurance policies or save up to leave money to his kids, that’s great. I don’t see why they have to be given our home.

Is he paying towards the mortgage or are you paying for it all?

If you are concerned about your deposit (and rightly so!) then get it written up so that you get your deposit back in any future unfortunate event and then split the rest.

But to expect a man to pay towards a home and leave all his share to you and one of his children and nothing to his other biookids? YABU and incredibly selfish.

Rileysp · 03/04/2026 20:57

Casperroonie · 03/04/2026 20:34

Keep your flat, do not sell it. Rent it out.

Find deposit elsewhere or simply wait.

Wait until when though?

Do people realise how normal people live? Who on earth is saving a deposit on mat leave with 4 kids, whilst renting?

TheKitchenLady · 03/04/2026 21:25

This is not about insurance: it's about wills. My husband and I both have children from previous relationships. Our mirror wills protect us both, and also our children. The home is protected for the surviving spouse on death, so they don't suddenly find themselves hoofed out of their home. On the death of the remaining spouse, the estate is shared with 50% to my children, and 50% to his children.
If you are not married, sorting your wills is even more important. Don't leave yourself vulnerable. This doesn't just matter now, but in 20, 30, 40, 50 years time when one of you will pass away before the other.
If your partner can't see this, red flags should be waving.

Noodles1234 · 03/04/2026 21:27

As you are the only one putting in equity you need to both purchase this house as tenants in common (NOT joint tenants). This will financially protect you. Ensure a will is written up dividing up the assets to which children if you so decide.

Joint tenants own the whole property together, and ownership automatically passes to the survivor if one dies, suitable for couples. Tenants in common own distinct, divisible shares (e.g., 50/50, 70/30) that can be passed on by will, ideal for friends or new relationships with unequal contributions. Joint tenants have equal rights, while tenants in common can have unequal interests, the same % is divided should you seperate in the future thus protecting your investment). Will require a will to state who gets what especially with Tenants in Common (gaining popularity with blended families / where one person has a larger asset to put down when purchasing property).

BrokenWingsCantFly · 03/04/2026 22:02

Really surprised by the voting here so far.
He has kids, of course they should come first. Firstly you should ring fence your deposit as a percentage of what the house is worth now. Eg you got 25k deposit, house worth now £100k so he owns only the remaining 37.5%. That leaves you protected assuming everything thereforward is paid 50/50.

But he would be a really shit dad if he took out this insurance leaving all to you instead of his kids. If he died shortly after you bought then you would have everything. Likely go on to meet someone else and they benefit too, your future kids also benefit from his death, but his very own get nothing.

All people voting OP should get the money, would you really write your existing DC out of inheritance for a new relationship? I definitely wouldn't. I'll likely never marry to protect what I bring to the table from being taken from my DC who has been the 1 living the sacrifices for me to have got to this place. Less time with mum, more time with childminders

Swipe left for the next trending thread