Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to resent friend on UC living better than us?

402 replies

Sunshineandrainbows123 · 28/03/2026 16:54

I know I am being unreasonable but just need to rant and I’m aware that perception is different to reality. I’ve worked hard all my life, since I was 14, paid my way through uni to get a decent qualification and job at the end of it all. I bought a house with my partner but as with so many of us I feel like I can’t rub 2 pennies together. Meanwhile a close friend claims universal benefits, has minimum 4 holidays a year, 2-3 abroad, gets regular beauty treatments, a new car and is able to regularly take her children to the cinema, days out and buy them new clothes, trainers and toys. I feel like I took the wrong path sometimes - she doesn’t have to pay rent for the home they live in, or school lunches for her kids, there are so many discounts and opportunities afforded to those on UC that working families don’t get. I don’t know if it’s better to distance myself. I know I need to probably give my head a wobble.

OP posts:
Tablesandchairs23 · 28/03/2026 17:10

I think your friend has another income she hasn't declared.

MyLimeGuide · 28/03/2026 17:10

Sartre · 28/03/2026 17:09

Wow, did we hop in a time capsule back to 2026? I haven’t heard that term for literal decades, since I was a child.

Do you mean 2006?

myglowupera · 28/03/2026 17:10

she doesn’t have to pay rent for the home they live in

Oh really? Does her landlord not charge rent then? Does she own her house so no housing costs?

Just with you saying she doesn’t have to pay rent hun.

RodeoClown · 28/03/2026 17:10

Sunshineandrainbows123 · 28/03/2026 17:08

So true! Thank you

Is it though?

youalright · 28/03/2026 17:10

Are you usually this gullible

cloudtreecarpet · 28/03/2026 17:11

Even if this were true, it's only temporary. She won't be able to claim for her kids forever and she isn't on the property ladder.

You meanwhile will be building a pension, possibly saving and will hopefully fully own your own home one day.

Fast forward a few years & her life choices won't look so great.

MyLimeGuide · 28/03/2026 17:11

5128gap · 28/03/2026 17:05

If you really believe that, then why not give up your job and claim UC yourself?

Im thinking OP has work ethic and morals...

MyLimeGuide · 28/03/2026 17:12

RodeoClown · 28/03/2026 17:10

Is it though?

Yes it is though

Port1aCastis · 28/03/2026 17:12

Never ceases to amaze me how folks know so much about other people's finances, I don't tell anyone what goes into my accounts as it's none of their bloody business and one or two acquaintances may start a thread about me as I'm a single Mother.

Drippingfeed · 28/03/2026 17:14

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SmallTreeDeepRoots · 28/03/2026 17:14

If you rent HA house that can work. If you qualify for motability it looks like you have new cars, but they are leased through the scheme. All sorts of ways to get very cheap short holidays if that’s your priority. But benefits won’t pay a mortgage. Unless you are also working, there probably won’t be private pension or significant savings for emergencies. And presumably there’s some sort of health issue for the motability car. And you are completely at the mercy of this week’s government.

I am certain that there is a sweet spot between working full time and not working which maximises both your income and your non-working time. A lot of parents at our primary school found they were better off reducing hours and getting the top up (plus bonuses like FSM). Just as some higher earners are better off taking less money home (reducing hours or increasing pension payments). The system is inherently broken.

JeepersItsTheKraken · 28/03/2026 17:14

Sounds like credit cards / loans / Klarna. Thank your lucky stars that's not you, as one day that all that debt will come home to roost

CurlewKate · 28/03/2026 17:14

Sunshineandrainbows123 · 28/03/2026 16:59

I’m guessing there must be more to it, more help or borrowing than she lets on. She’s never said it’s all covered by her UC which is why I said i think the perception is probably different to the reality

Well, why did you say in your first post that she gets that on UC?

myglowupera · 28/03/2026 17:14

cloudtreecarpet · 28/03/2026 17:11

Even if this were true, it's only temporary. She won't be able to claim for her kids forever and she isn't on the property ladder.

You meanwhile will be building a pension, possibly saving and will hopefully fully own your own home one day.

Fast forward a few years & her life choices won't look so great.

Exactly. This is where benefit bashers don’t think their arguments through. Zero sympathy for the lot of them.

Sunshineandrainbows123 · 28/03/2026 17:15

myglowupera · 28/03/2026 17:10

she doesn’t have to pay rent for the home they live in

Oh really? Does her landlord not charge rent then? Does she own her house so no housing costs?

Just with you saying she doesn’t have to pay rent hun.

Sorry, you’re right. She does have to pay rent to a landlord but it is covered by the housing element of her UC I believe

OP posts:
youalright · 28/03/2026 17:16

CurlewKate · 28/03/2026 17:14

Well, why did you say in your first post that she gets that on UC?

To shit stir

Drippingfeed · 28/03/2026 17:16

Sunshineandrainbows123 · 28/03/2026 17:15

Sorry, you’re right. She does have to pay rent to a landlord but it is covered by the housing element of her UC I believe

It is almost never entirely covered especially private rent. Local housing allowance where I live is less than 80 pc most market rents

youalright · 28/03/2026 17:19

Drippingfeed · 28/03/2026 17:16

It is almost never entirely covered especially private rent. Local housing allowance where I live is less than 80 pc most market rents

Shhh don't be stating facts now it doesn't fit in with op narrative

Coffeeandbooks88 · 28/03/2026 17:19

She must be getting help or not declaring money as I can barely afford a holiday on UC.

myglowupera · 28/03/2026 17:21

Sunshineandrainbows123 · 28/03/2026 17:15

Sorry, you’re right. She does have to pay rent to a landlord but it is covered by the housing element of her UC I believe

So she does pay rent then. Doesn’t matter where the money is coming from, she’s still paying rent.

It never makes any sense when people say people on benefits are living there rent free or they’ve got a “free house”. Free house 😂. I know you haven’t said those exact words but my god some people are clueless.

5128gap · 28/03/2026 17:21

MyLimeGuide · 28/03/2026 17:11

Im thinking OP has work ethic and morals...

She could do voluntary work for an excellent cause if that's the issue. That'd be a win all round wouldn't it? She does her bit for society, and rakes it in from UC.

MyLimeGuide · 28/03/2026 17:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

The irony of your post proving my point exactly!😂👏

Sunshineandrainbows123 · 28/03/2026 17:22

youalright · 28/03/2026 17:19

Shhh don't be stating facts now it doesn't fit in with op narrative

🤣 it is honestly helpful to understand these things and for real life experiences to be shared. The aggressive nature of some replies is interesting

OP posts:
Drippingfeed · 28/03/2026 17:22

SmallTreeDeepRoots · 28/03/2026 17:14

If you rent HA house that can work. If you qualify for motability it looks like you have new cars, but they are leased through the scheme. All sorts of ways to get very cheap short holidays if that’s your priority. But benefits won’t pay a mortgage. Unless you are also working, there probably won’t be private pension or significant savings for emergencies. And presumably there’s some sort of health issue for the motability car. And you are completely at the mercy of this week’s government.

I am certain that there is a sweet spot between working full time and not working which maximises both your income and your non-working time. A lot of parents at our primary school found they were better off reducing hours and getting the top up (plus bonuses like FSM). Just as some higher earners are better off taking less money home (reducing hours or increasing pension payments). The system is inherently broken.

I disagree. In any given universal system there will be people who work the system. I would say it is impossible to cover every possible individual or family circumstance because there are so many variables. Where you live, child care, age, disabilities, tax regimes etcetera. Nothing to do with a 'broken' system that can somehow be magically fixed to be perfect.

Coffeeandbooks88 · 28/03/2026 17:22

SmallTreeDeepRoots · 28/03/2026 17:14

If you rent HA house that can work. If you qualify for motability it looks like you have new cars, but they are leased through the scheme. All sorts of ways to get very cheap short holidays if that’s your priority. But benefits won’t pay a mortgage. Unless you are also working, there probably won’t be private pension or significant savings for emergencies. And presumably there’s some sort of health issue for the motability car. And you are completely at the mercy of this week’s government.

I am certain that there is a sweet spot between working full time and not working which maximises both your income and your non-working time. A lot of parents at our primary school found they were better off reducing hours and getting the top up (plus bonuses like FSM). Just as some higher earners are better off taking less money home (reducing hours or increasing pension payments). The system is inherently broken.

You have to be earning incredibly low to qualify for FSM. Something like £7,500 per year. In England anyway.