Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

This country is doomed

964 replies

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 08:29

While the vote in Gorton and Denton may be described as a 'protest' vote the strength of both the Greens and Reform performance is something to worry all of us not just Labour.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
EasternStandard · 27/02/2026 19:50

LoftyPlumLion · 27/02/2026 19:44

must be nice having a pension pot of a million, no doubt you earnt it with no privilege at all.

I thought she meant house plus pension? Even a few Labour supporters probably have that.

Underthinker · 27/02/2026 19:51

BIossomtoes · 27/02/2026 19:10

It’s a single issue voting determinant for some (fortunately a tiny minority) women.

Its not my single issue, but i would never vote for a party that fully embraced gender ideology, any more than I would vote for a party that enshrined tenets of scientology or flat earthism into law and ejected any dissenters on those issues from the party.

And its not just women who take that stance, I'm male.

Skinnysaluki · 27/02/2026 19:55

Giraffe007 · 27/02/2026 19:49

Completely open borders, leave NATO (gift to Putin!) abolish private landlords for starters.

Abolishing private landlords sounds like an absolutely brilliant idea

glitterpaperchain · 27/02/2026 20:00

Giraffe007 · 27/02/2026 19:49

Completely open borders, leave NATO (gift to Putin!) abolish private landlords for starters.

Are you aware that two of these are not actually green party policies?

And 'abolish landlords' is a shorthand for a very detailed plan to make homes accessible and fair

https://croydon.greenparty.org.uk/2025/10/26/abolish-landlords/

Abolish Landlords - Croydon Green Party

Paul Ainscough, one of our Council candidates for Fairfield Ward, explains what our policies would mean for Croydon. At the recent Green Party conference, a policy motion was passed called “Abolish Landlords”. Many people have not looked beyond that ti...

https://croydon.greenparty.org.uk/2025/10/26/abolish-landlords/

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 20:01

Skinnysaluki · 27/02/2026 19:55

Abolishing private landlords sounds like an absolutely brilliant idea

Unless you're one of the thousands who can't afford to buy a home. Some people need to rent, for various reasons. In any case there will be lots more properties available on the open market come May so I guess this Labour government got something right.

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 27/02/2026 20:03

Psychosislotus · 27/02/2026 19:30

We don’t need ideological dreams, we need reality. Realistic actionable ideas.

No I am saying super rich people aren’t ever going to use that money. Say for example Elon with his 100 billion or whatever it is now. He’s never going to use 90 billion of that. That’s pretty easy to say as it’s just impossible. So rather than take 90 billion from him. You could just print 90 billion. It doesnt actually make any difference. But people would say we can’t do that - not sure why - inflation I assume? But if that’s the case redistributing wealth wouldn’t work either.

Does that make sense?

Edited

That makes zero sense. And why Musk? He’s a total irrelevance to UK politics.

glitterpaperchain · 27/02/2026 20:03

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 20:01

Unless you're one of the thousands who can't afford to buy a home. Some people need to rent, for various reasons. In any case there will be lots more properties available on the open market come May so I guess this Labour government got something right.

Yes some people need to rent, so the Greens want to increase social housing so they rent from the council, at a fair rate, rather than private landlords who rent homes for profit. Honestly do people really just loudly oppose greens without any actual knowledge of their policies? Silly question, yes they do it's all over this thread

scottishgirl69 · 27/02/2026 20:05

Well the greens ain't coming for my pension that's for sure. I've just checked my pension pot (40k). To be fair I have two that I haven't transferred over to the site where all my pensions are consolidated (I paid into one work pension for five years and I would lose benefits if I transferred that over ).

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 20:06

glitterpaperchain · 27/02/2026 20:03

Yes some people need to rent, so the Greens want to increase social housing so they rent from the council, at a fair rate, rather than private landlords who rent homes for profit. Honestly do people really just loudly oppose greens without any actual knowledge of their policies? Silly question, yes they do it's all over this thread

As pp asked further up thread how are the Greens proposing to pay for the social housing that is needed? Houses can't be magicked out of thin air. Genuine question.

OP posts:
Psychosislotus · 27/02/2026 20:11

BIossomtoes · 27/02/2026 20:03

That makes zero sense. And why Musk? He’s a total irrelevance to UK politics.

I used musk because he has the most money in the world so a good example of these mega billionaires. I actually googled after and he actually had nearly 900 billion!!! Wild!

I am not sure what is difficult to understand in what I am saying. Its circulation isn’t it. The money is already out of circulation when it’s locked up at the bottom of billionaires bank accounts. So if we want to redistribute it why not just do it. You don’t need to take it from them because they aren’t going to use it anyway. It makes sense to me. If you can tell me the bit you don’t understand then might be able to try again.

glitterpaperchain · 27/02/2026 20:12

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 20:06

As pp asked further up thread how are the Greens proposing to pay for the social housing that is needed? Houses can't be magicked out of thin air. Genuine question.

'We would introduce a land value tax to shift tax from tenants to landlords; increase taxes on empty properties to incentivise bringing them back into use; and introduce national insurance on rental income so landlords pay the same tax on their earnings as everyone else.'

https://croydon.greenparty.org.uk/2025/10/26/abolish-landlords/

scottishgirl69 · 27/02/2026 20:12

glitterpaperchain · 27/02/2026 20:03

Yes some people need to rent, so the Greens want to increase social housing so they rent from the council, at a fair rate, rather than private landlords who rent homes for profit. Honestly do people really just loudly oppose greens without any actual knowledge of their policies? Silly question, yes they do it's all over this thread

I'm not the biggest fan of the Greens but I wouldn't just write them off as being awful. I actually joined them a few years ago but they don't have much presence in my area. Gillian McKay is my regional MSP but they have no MPs and no councillors in my particular area and never have had

I live in social housing and I have spoken about this on another thread. I only got a council flat because I took a flat in a very hard to let area - my brother bought a flat two years ago after a relationship split (long story but the split was acrimonious and he eventually walked away from his share of the house and started again)

He was lucky that he could afford to buy a flat because house prices here aren't that bad - not everyone is that lucky

glitterpaperchain · 27/02/2026 20:13

Psychosislotus · 27/02/2026 20:11

I used musk because he has the most money in the world so a good example of these mega billionaires. I actually googled after and he actually had nearly 900 billion!!! Wild!

I am not sure what is difficult to understand in what I am saying. Its circulation isn’t it. The money is already out of circulation when it’s locked up at the bottom of billionaires bank accounts. So if we want to redistribute it why not just do it. You don’t need to take it from them because they aren’t going to use it anyway. It makes sense to me. If you can tell me the bit you don’t understand then might be able to try again.

We bring it back into circulation by taxing it. That's what taxes are.

scottishgirl69 · 27/02/2026 20:13

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 20:06

As pp asked further up thread how are the Greens proposing to pay for the social housing that is needed? Houses can't be magicked out of thin air. Genuine question.

The Snp in Scotland have managed to build a lot more council housing in Scotland than Labour did here when they ran Holyrood. Not enough but they've managed it

BIossomtoes · 27/02/2026 20:15

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 20:06

As pp asked further up thread how are the Greens proposing to pay for the social housing that is needed? Houses can't be magicked out of thin air. Genuine question.

You could have clicked on the link upthread and found this but let me encourage your laziness.

We would start by ending the right-to-buy scam. We would also end the financial incentives and tax-breaks that were set up to encourage private landlords. We would end buy-to-let mortgages and bring back rent controls to stop landlords exploiting renters. We would introduce a land value tax to shift tax from tenants to landlords; increase taxes on empty properties to incentivise bringing them back into use; and introduce national insurance on rental income so landlords pay the same tax on their earnings as everyone else.

When it comes to housing supply, instead of just building more and more houses, the sensible thing is to start by making better use of the properties we already have. A Green Government would finance the purchase of empty properties; properties being sold by landlords; and those properties that aren’t being maintained properly by landlords. All of this would increase the supply of healthy, affordable homes without having to build so many more.

When we do build new housing, the Green Party wouldn’t follow the Labour and Conservative model of just letting private developers do whatever they want. We don’t want more of the luxury investment properties that make the biggest profits for developers. We should be building the types of properties we really need in the places where they are really needed. We would not only tighten up planning regulations, we would also create a Government run national housebuilding programme. Brick-By-Brick is a perfect example of what can go wrong when individual Councils try to build properties themselves, so we will bring in a properly regulated, innovative, and trustworthy Government building company that Councils can then apply to.

scottishgirl69 · 27/02/2026 20:15

I live near Glasgow and it's 600 pounds a month plus for a room in a flat - it can be 1000 plus in the West end of Glasgow - Edinburgh is even worse. There definitely is a housing crisis

glitterpaperchain · 27/02/2026 20:16

BIossomtoes · 27/02/2026 20:15

You could have clicked on the link upthread and found this but let me encourage your laziness.

We would start by ending the right-to-buy scam. We would also end the financial incentives and tax-breaks that were set up to encourage private landlords. We would end buy-to-let mortgages and bring back rent controls to stop landlords exploiting renters. We would introduce a land value tax to shift tax from tenants to landlords; increase taxes on empty properties to incentivise bringing them back into use; and introduce national insurance on rental income so landlords pay the same tax on their earnings as everyone else.

When it comes to housing supply, instead of just building more and more houses, the sensible thing is to start by making better use of the properties we already have. A Green Government would finance the purchase of empty properties; properties being sold by landlords; and those properties that aren’t being maintained properly by landlords. All of this would increase the supply of healthy, affordable homes without having to build so many more.

When we do build new housing, the Green Party wouldn’t follow the Labour and Conservative model of just letting private developers do whatever they want. We don’t want more of the luxury investment properties that make the biggest profits for developers. We should be building the types of properties we really need in the places where they are really needed. We would not only tighten up planning regulations, we would also create a Government run national housebuilding programme. Brick-By-Brick is a perfect example of what can go wrong when individual Councils try to build properties themselves, so we will bring in a properly regulated, innovative, and trustworthy Government building company that Councils can then apply to.

Thank you I also just copied and pasted from the link I had already posted. If it was a genuine question OP could've actually just looked herself but she doesn't really care clearly

TheKittenswithMittens · 27/02/2026 20:20

I would agree totally with ending right to buy. Though isn't it popular with Muslims?

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 20:21

BIossomtoes · 27/02/2026 20:15

You could have clicked on the link upthread and found this but let me encourage your laziness.

We would start by ending the right-to-buy scam. We would also end the financial incentives and tax-breaks that were set up to encourage private landlords. We would end buy-to-let mortgages and bring back rent controls to stop landlords exploiting renters. We would introduce a land value tax to shift tax from tenants to landlords; increase taxes on empty properties to incentivise bringing them back into use; and introduce national insurance on rental income so landlords pay the same tax on their earnings as everyone else.

When it comes to housing supply, instead of just building more and more houses, the sensible thing is to start by making better use of the properties we already have. A Green Government would finance the purchase of empty properties; properties being sold by landlords; and those properties that aren’t being maintained properly by landlords. All of this would increase the supply of healthy, affordable homes without having to build so many more.

When we do build new housing, the Green Party wouldn’t follow the Labour and Conservative model of just letting private developers do whatever they want. We don’t want more of the luxury investment properties that make the biggest profits for developers. We should be building the types of properties we really need in the places where they are really needed. We would not only tighten up planning regulations, we would also create a Government run national housebuilding programme. Brick-By-Brick is a perfect example of what can go wrong when individual Councils try to build properties themselves, so we will bring in a properly regulated, innovative, and trustworthy Government building company that Councils can then apply to.

I missed the link. I do have a life outside of MN and haven't kept up with all the posts.
But thank you so much for providing the information.

OP posts:
Anyahyacinth · 27/02/2026 20:22

I think it’s incredibly heartening they won, a very positive day 💚

BIossomtoes · 27/02/2026 20:22

TheKittenswithMittens · 27/02/2026 20:20

I would agree totally with ending right to buy. Though isn't it popular with Muslims?

If that’s true (I actually doubt it) a choice between losing their right to buy discounts and being kicked out of the country is a bit of a no brainer.

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 20:23

glitterpaperchain · 27/02/2026 20:16

Thank you I also just copied and pasted from the link I had already posted. If it was a genuine question OP could've actually just looked herself but she doesn't really care clearly

See my answer to @Blossomtoes above.

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 27/02/2026 20:24

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 20:21

I missed the link. I do have a life outside of MN and haven't kept up with all the posts.
But thank you so much for providing the information.

Well, it’s your thread, mate. If the rest of us can keep up maybe try a bit harder.

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 20:24

BIossomtoes · 27/02/2026 20:24

Well, it’s your thread, mate. If the rest of us can keep up maybe try a bit harder.

Give it a rest FFS. You've made your point, I think 🤔

OP posts:
ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 27/02/2026 20:25

BIossomtoes · 27/02/2026 20:15

You could have clicked on the link upthread and found this but let me encourage your laziness.

We would start by ending the right-to-buy scam. We would also end the financial incentives and tax-breaks that were set up to encourage private landlords. We would end buy-to-let mortgages and bring back rent controls to stop landlords exploiting renters. We would introduce a land value tax to shift tax from tenants to landlords; increase taxes on empty properties to incentivise bringing them back into use; and introduce national insurance on rental income so landlords pay the same tax on their earnings as everyone else.

When it comes to housing supply, instead of just building more and more houses, the sensible thing is to start by making better use of the properties we already have. A Green Government would finance the purchase of empty properties; properties being sold by landlords; and those properties that aren’t being maintained properly by landlords. All of this would increase the supply of healthy, affordable homes without having to build so many more.

When we do build new housing, the Green Party wouldn’t follow the Labour and Conservative model of just letting private developers do whatever they want. We don’t want more of the luxury investment properties that make the biggest profits for developers. We should be building the types of properties we really need in the places where they are really needed. We would not only tighten up planning regulations, we would also create a Government run national housebuilding programme. Brick-By-Brick is a perfect example of what can go wrong when individual Councils try to build properties themselves, so we will bring in a properly regulated, innovative, and trustworthy Government building company that Councils can then apply to.

But they have not said how they will finance that.

Open borders will mean a shitload of housing will be needed.

Swipe left for the next trending thread